Abstract
What is the best method for undertaking critical social theory, and what are its ontological and normative commitments? Andreas Reckwitz has developed compelling answers to these questions drawing on practice theory. As a practice theorist myself, I am very sympathetic to his approach. This paper sketches a social theory that extends the reach of practice theory to include non-human animals and allows us to discriminate between importantly different kinds of social formations. In doing so, I argue that a strongly normative basis for differentiating social phenomena is compatible with the methods of social theory and critical social theorists need not shy away from first-order moral commitments.
References
Althusser, L. 1971/2014. “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses,” Trans. B. Brewster. In On the Reproduction of Capitalism. London: Verso, 232–72.Search in Google Scholar
Anderson, E. 1995. “Knowledge, Human Interests, and Objectivity in Feminist Epistemology.” Philosophical Topics 23 (2): 27–58. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtopics199523213.Search in Google Scholar
Anderson, E. 2020. “Feminist Epistemology and Philosophy of Science.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. N. Zalta. Also available at <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/feminism-epistemology/>.Search in Google Scholar
Andrews, K. 2020. The Animal Mind: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Animal Cognition, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203712511Search in Google Scholar
Balkin, J. M. 1998. Cultural Software: A Theory of Ideology. New Haven: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Bartky, S. 1990. Femininity and Domination. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Bratman, M. 1992. “Shared Cooperative Activity.” The Philosophical Review 101 (2): 327–41. https://doi.org/10.2307/2185537.Search in Google Scholar
Douglas, H. 2000. “Inductive Risk and Values in Science.” Philosophy of Science 67 (4): 559–79. https://doi.org/10.1086/392855.Search in Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1979. Discipline and Punish, trans. A. Sheridan. New York: Vintage Books.Search in Google Scholar
Garfinkel, A. 1981. Forms of Explanation: Rethinking the Questions in Social Theory. New Haven: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Geuss, R. 1981. The Idea of a Critical Theory: Habermas and the Frankfurt School. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Gilbert, M. 1989. On Social Facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Haslanger, S. 2016. “Theorizing with a Purpose: The Many Kinds of Sex.” In Natural Kinds and Classification in Scientific Practice, edited by C. Kendig, 129–44. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Haslanger, S. 2018. “What Is a Social Practice?” Philosophy 82: 231–47. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1358246118000085.Search in Google Scholar
Haslanger, S. 2019a. “Disciplined Bodies and Ideology Critique.” In Glass Bead Site 2: Somatic Reason and Synthetic Eros. Also available at https://www.glass-bead.org/article/disciplined-bodies-and-ideology-critique/?lang=enview.Search in Google Scholar
Haslanger, S. 2019b. “Cognition as a Social Skill.” Australasian Philosophical Review 3 (1): 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/24740500.2019.1705229.Search in Google Scholar
Haslanger, S. 2020. “Taking a Stand: Second-Order Pathologies or First Order Critique?” In Debating Critical Theory: Engagements with Axel Honneth, edited by J. Christ, K. Lepold, D. Loick, and T. Stahl, 35–49. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Search in Google Scholar
Haslanger, S. 2021. “Political Epistemology and Social Critique.” Oxford Studies in Political Philosophy 7: 23–65.10.1093/oso/9780192897480.003.0002Search in Google Scholar
Horkheimer, M. 1968/2002. Critical Theory: Selected Essays. Trans. Matthew, J. O’Connell and others. New York: Continuum Publishers.Search in Google Scholar
Hrdy, S. B. 1986. “Empathy, Polyandry, and the Myth of the Coy Female.” In Feminist Approaches to Science, edited by R. Bleier, 119–46. New York: Pergamon Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kukla [writing as Rebecca Kukla], Q., and M. Lance. 2014. “Intersubjectivity and Receptive Experience.” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 52: 22–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjp.12047.Search in Google Scholar
Longino, H. 1990. Science as Social Knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Mansbridge, J., and A. Morris, Eds. 2001. Oppositional Consciousness: The Subjective Roots of Social Protest. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226225784.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Mills, C. 1988. “Alternative Epistemologies.” In Social Theory and Practice, vol. 14, 237–63.10.5840/soctheorpract198814316Search in Google Scholar
Mills, C. 2007. “White Ignorance.” In Race and Epistemologies of Ignorance, edited by S. Sullivan, and N. Tuana. Albany: SUNY Press.Search in Google Scholar
O’Connor, C. 2019. The Origins of Unfairness: Social Categories and Cultural Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198789970.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Reckwitz, A. 2002. “Toward a Theory of Social Practices. A Development in Culturalist Theorizing.” European Journal of Social Theory 5 (2): 243–263.10.1177/13684310222225432Search in Google Scholar
Reckwitz, A., and H. Rosa. 2023. Late-Modernity in Crisis. Why We Need a Theory of Society. Cambridge: Polity.Search in Google Scholar
Risjord, M. W. 2000. Woodcutters and Witchcraft. Albany: SUNY Press.Search in Google Scholar
Searle, J. 1995. The Construction of Social Reality. New York: The Free Press.Search in Google Scholar
Sewell, W. 1992. “A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation.” American Journal of Sociology 98 (1): 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1086/229967.Search in Google Scholar
Sewell, W. 2005. “The Concept(s) of Culture.” In Practicing History: New Directions in Historical Writing after the Linguistic Turn, edited by G. M. Spiegel, 76–95. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Shelby, T. 2003. “Ideology, Racism, and Critical Social Theory.” The Philosophical Forum 34 (2): 153–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9191.00132.Search in Google Scholar
Sterelny, K. 2012. The Evolved Apprentice. Cambridge: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262016797.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
van Fraassen, B. 1980. The Scientific Image. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0198244274.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Wright, E. O. 2010. Envisioning Real Utopias. London: Verso.Search in Google Scholar
Young, I. 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Zawidzki, T. W. 2013. Mindshaping: A New Framework for Understanding Human Social Cognition. Cambridge: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/8441.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
