Abstract
I model an attempt by radical parties to topple a modus vivendi between a ruling government and a moderate opposition group. Cooperation between the regime and the moderate opposition is possible if each player prefers mutual cooperation to mutual confrontation. If each player also prefers mutual confrontation to cooperating while the other defects then radical parties have a chance at breaking up this accord. Radical parties can succeed in bringing the government and opposition to mutual confrontation if they can agree on power-sharing arrangements after regime change. This paper also resolves central questions surrounding the trial and crucifixion of Jesus Christ. I use an institutional approach to infer player preferences from historical and biblical sources and then use game theory to model the interactions between participants in these events. In so doing, I clarify aspects of the Gospel narrative that have puzzled readers for the past 2000 years.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bornkamm, G. (1960), Jesus of Nazareth. (New York, Haper and Row).
Brams, S.J. (1994), Game Theory and Literature, Games and Economic Behavior 6, 32–54.
Brams, S.J. (2003), Biblical Games: A Strategic Analysis of Stories in the Old Testament. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Brown, R.E. (1994), The Death of the Messiah: From Gethsemane to the Grave, Vols. I and II, New York: Doubleday.
Burkill, T.A. (1956), The Competence of the Sanhedrin, Vigilae Christianae, Vol. 10.
Burkill, T.A. (1958), The Trial of Jesus, Vigilae Christianae, Vol. 12.
van Damme, E. (1991), Stability and Perfection of Nash Equilibria. Berlin: Springer.
Feldman, L. and Hata, G. (eds.) (1987), Josephus, Judaism and Christianity. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.
Finkel, A. (1964), The Pharisees and the Teacher of Nazareth. Leiden, E.J. Brill.
Flavius, J. (1999), The Jewish War, in: The New Complete Works of Josephus. W. Whiston, W. (trans.). Grand Rapids: Kregel.
Grant, M. (trans.) (1988), Tacitus: The Annals of Imperial Rome. London: Penguin.
Klassen, W. (1996), Judas: Betrayer or Friend of Jesus?. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.
Grant, M. (1977), Jesus: An Historian's View of the Gospels. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
Lowry, S.T. and Gordon, B. (1998), Ancient and Medieval Economic Ideas and Concepts of Social Justice. Leiden: Brill.
McLaren, J. (1991), Power and Politics in Palestine. Worcester: Sheffield Academic Press.
Mould, E.W.K. (1951), Essentials of Bible History. New York: Ronald Press Company.
O'Neill, B. (1982), A problem of rights arbitration from the talmud, Mathematical Social Sciences 2, 345–371.
O'Neill, B. (1991), The strategy of challenges: two beheading games in medieval literature, in: Selten, R. (ed.), Game Equilibrium Models. Berlin: Springer.
Scholem, G. (1971), TheMessianic Idea in Judaism. New York: Schocken Books.
Schonfield, H.J. (1965), The Passover Plot: New Light on the History of Jesus. Bernard Geis Associates, Random House.
Schuerer, E. (1961), A History of the Jewish People in the Time of Jesus. New York: Schocken Books.
Watson, A. (1995), The Trial of Jesus. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
Winter, P. (1961) On the Trial of Jesus. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter and Co.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hassner, R.E. The Trial and Crucifixion of Jesus: A Modest Proposal. Theory and Decision 54, 1–32 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025088217300
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025088217300