This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Habermas, J. (1982). The entwinement of myth and enlightenment: Re-reading dialectic of enlightenment.New German Critique 26: 13–30.
Habermas, J. (1987).Theory of communicative action. Vol. 2:Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason. Trans. McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press.
Hayim, G. (1992). Naturalism and the crisis of rationalism in Habermas.Social Theory and Practice 18(2):187–209.
Hegel, G.W.F. (1967).The phenomenology of mind. Trans. J.B. Baille. New York: Harper Torch Books.
Heidegger, M. (1977).The question concerning technology and other essays. Trans. W. Lovitt. New York: Harper Torchbooks.
Horigan, S. (1988).Nature and culture in western discourse. New York: Routledge.
Kitschelt, H. (1985). New social movements in West Germany and the United States.Political Power and Social Theory 5: 273–324.
Lowith, K. (1952). Nature, history, and existentialism.Social Research 19(1)79–94.
Luhmann, N. (1982).The differentiation of society. Trans. J. Holmes and C. Larmore. New York: Columbia University Press.
Luhmann, N. (1984). The self-description of society: Crisis fashion and sociological theory.International Journal of Comparative Sociology 25(1)60–72.
Luhmann, N. (1989).Ecological communications. Trans. J. Bednarz. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Luhmann, N. (1990).Essays on self-reference. New York: Columbia University Press.
Melucci, A. (1981). Ten hypotheses for the analysis of new movements. In D. Pinto (Ed.),Contemporary Italian sociology: A reader. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Melucci, A. (1985). The symbolic challenge of contemporary movements.Social Research 52(4)789–816.
Melucci, A. (1989).Nomads of the present: Social movements and individual needs in contemporary society. Trans. J. Keene and P. Mier. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Merquior, J.G. (1986).From Prague to Paris: A critique of structuralist and post-structuralist thought. London, New York: Verso.
Moscivici, S. (1977). The reenchantment of the world. In N. Birnbaum (Ed.),Beyond the crisis 133–168. London, Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
Nietzsche, F. (1910).The will to power. Trans. A.M. Ludovici. Edinburgh and London: T.N. Foulis.
Teubner, G. (1987). Introduction to autopoietic law. In G. Teubner (Ed.),Autopoietic law: A new approach to law and society. New York: Walter de Gruyter.
van Twist, M.J.W. and Schaap, L. (1991). Introduction to autopoiesis theory and autopoietic steering. In R.J. Intveldet al. (Eds.),Autopoiesis and configuration theory: New approaches to societal steering. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hayim, G.J. Postmodern tendencies in the sociology of Luhmann. Hum Stud 17, 307–324 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01322972
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01322972