Reason and Virtues: The Paradox of R. S. Peters on Moral Education

9Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article examines the work of R. S. Peters on moral development and moral education, as represented in his papers collected under that name, pointing out that these writings have been relatively neglected. It approaches these writings through the lens of the 'familiar story' that philosophical work on this topic switched during, roughly, the 1980s from an emphasis on rational principles to an emphasis on virtues and care. Starting from what Peters called 'the paradox of moral education'-roughly, that a rational morality must be developed in part through habit-the article discusses not only Peters' rational morality of principles and rules but also elements of his thought concerning virtues and care. Running through the discussion is the question of whether Peters, in drawing for instance on Aristotle as well as Kohlberg, is attempting to combine incompatible ideas. Against this, it is suggested that in reading Peters now we can learn from his explicit claim that we need a pluralistic, not a monolithic, approach to moral development and moral education. © 2009 The Author. Journal compilation © 2009 Journal of the Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Haydon, G. (2009). Reason and Virtues: The Paradox of R. S. Peters on Moral Education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 43(SUPPL. 1), 173–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9752.2009.00717.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free