Abstract
In the economic literature on the firm, especially in the transaction–cost tradition, a sharp distinction is drawn between so-called “market transactions” and “administered transactions.” This distinction is of enormous importance for business ethics, since market transactions are governed by the competitive logic of the market, whereas administered transactions are subject to the cooperative norms that govern collective action in a bureaucracy. The widespread failure to distinguish between these two types of transactions, and thus to distinguish between adversarial and non-adversarial relations, has led many business ethicists to develop a “uniform” moral code. Yet in market transactions, the checks and balances built into the system of commercial exchange are such as to permit more instrumental forms of behavior. In administered transactions, by contrast, these checks and balances are absent, and thus the institutional context calls for much greater exercise of moral restraint. In this paper, I begin the task of developing an adversarial ethic for business. According to this view, the competitive environment licenses a greater range of “self-interested” behavior, but also imposes its own constraints on the strategies that firms may adopt in the pursuit of their interests.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Applbaum A. I. (1999) Ethics for Adversaries. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Arrow K., Debreu G. (1954) Existence of an Equilibrium for a Competitive Economy. Econometrica 27: 82–109
Arrow K. (1973) Social Responsibility and Economic Efficiency. Public Policy 21: 303–317
Austin, J. L.: 1979 “A Plea for Excuses,” in idem, Philosophical Papers, 3rd edition (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
Baier K. (1958) The Moral Point of View. Cornell University Press, Ithaca
Baron M. (2005) Justifications and Excuses. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 2: 387–413
Baumol W. (1974) Business Responsibility and Economic Behavior. In: Anshen M. (eds) Managing the Socially Responsible Corporation. MacMillan, New York
Blake J., Amat O., Dowds J. (1998) The Ethics of Creative Accounting. In: Gowthorpe C., Blake J. (eds) Ethical Issues in Accounting. Routledge, London
Boatright J. R. (2002) Justifying the Role of the Shareholder. In: Bowie N. E. (eds) The Blackwell Guide to Business Ethics. Blackwell, Oxford
Braithwaite J. (1981) The Limits of Economism in Controlling Harmful Corporate Conduct. Law and Society Review 16: 481–504
Buchanan A. (1996) Toward a Theory of the Ethics of Bureaucratic Organizations. Business Ethics Quarterly 6: 419–440
Clark R. C. (1985) Agency Costs versus Fiduciary Duties. In: Pratt J. W., Zeckhauser R. J. (eds) Principals and Agents: The Structure of Business. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA
Coase R. (1937) The Nature of the Firm. Economica 4: 386–405
Coleman J. W. (1989) The Criminal Elite: The Sociology of White Collar Crime. St. Martin’s, New York
Commission for Fair Play (1993) The Attitude of Canadian Youth and Coaches Concerning Fair Play. Government of Canada, Ottawa
Easterbrooke F. H., Fischel D. R. (1991) The Economic Structure of Corporate Law. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Economist: 2005. ‘Survey: Corporate Social Responsibility’, The Economist, Jan. 20
Feezell R. M. (1988) Sportsmanship. In: Morgan W. J., Meier K. V. (eds) Philosophic Inquiry in Sport. Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL
Fraleigh Warren. (1984) Right Actions in Sport. Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL
Frank R. H., Cook P. J. (1995) The Winner-Take-All Society. Penguin, New York
Friedman M. (1962) Capitalism and Freedom. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Friedman, M.: 1970, ‘The Social Responsibility of Business is the Increase its Profits’, New York Times Magazine, Sept. 13
Galbraith J. K. (1952) American Capitalism: The Concept of Countervailing Power. Houghton Mifflin, Cambridge, MA
Gauthier D. (1982) No Need for Morality: The Case of the Competitive Market. Philosophic Exchange 3: 41–54
Gauthier D. (1986) Morals by Agreement. Clarendon, Oxford
Goodpaster K. (1991) Business Ethics and Stakeholder Analysis. Business Ethics Quarterly 1: 53–73
Heath J. (2001) The Efficient Society. Penguin, Toronto
Heath J. (2003) A Market Failures Approach to Business Ethics. In: Hodgson B. (eds) The Invisible Hand and the Common Good. Springer, Berlin
Langtry B. (1994) Stakeholders and the Moral Responsibility of Business. Business Ethics Quarterly 4: 431–443
Leaman O. (1988) Cheating and Fair Play in Sport. In: Morgan W. J., Meier K. V. (eds) Philosophic Inquiry in Sport. Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL
Lipsey R., Lancaster K. (1956) The General Theory of the Second Best. Review of Economic Studies 24: 11–32
McLean B., Elkind P. (2003) The Smartest Guys in the Room. Penguin, New York
Schotter A. (1981) The Economic Theory of Social Institutions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Schultz W. J. (2001) The Moral Conditions of Economic Efficiency. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Shipman A. (1999) The Market Revolution and Its Limits. Routledge, London
Simon R. L. (1988) Good Competition and Drug-Enhanced Performance. In: Morgan W. J., Meier K. V. (eds) Philosophic Inquiry in Sport. Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL
Skillen A. (1998) Sport is for Losers. In: McNamee M. J., Parry S. D. (eds) Ethics and Sport. Routledge, London
Steenbergen J., Buisman A., van Hilvoorde I. (2001) Meanings of Fair Play in Competitive Sport. In: Steenberger J., De Knop P., Elling A. (eds) Values and Norms in Sport. Meyer and Meyer Sport, Oxford
Williamson O. E. (1975) Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. Free Press, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Joseph Heath is Associate Professor in the Department of Philosophy and the Centre for Ethics at the University of Toronto. He is the author of three books: Communicative Action and Rational Choice (MIT Press, 2001), The Efficient Society (Penguin, 2001), and with Andrew Potter. The Rebel Sell (HarperCollins, 2004). His research focuses on practical rationality, normative economics, and critical theory.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Heath, J. An Adversarial Ethic for Business: or When Sun-Tzu Met the Stakeholder. J Bus Ethics 72, 359–374 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9175-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9175-5