Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How Should Responsible Investors Behave? Keynes’s Distinction Between Entrepreneurship and Speculation Revisited

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper deals with Keynes’s distinction between entrepreneurship and speculation, regarding business people in general and especially investors’ behaviour. Based on Keynes’s thoughts about financial markets, it analyses how different motivations influence the decision-making process of investors and its consequences for stock markets and the real economy and clarifies that Keynes’s considerations are still useful for understanding contemporary developments and risks in the financial system. Furthermore, it points out that Keynes’s theories and policy recommendations should be understood in the context of his moral considerations, especially relating to individual responsibility of investors. Finally, Keynes’s moral thoughts can be taken as a foundation for a contemporary approach to investors’ responsibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Source Own representation, based on Keynes (1936), pp. 153–158

Fig. 2

Source Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis [https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/DDDM01USA156NWDB (last accessed: 29.07.2019)]

Fig. 3

Source World Bank [https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/CM.MKT.TRNR?view=chart (last accessed: 29.07.2019)]

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. From an idealistic philosopher’s point of view, this argumentation resembles Hegel’s idea of “trick of reason” (“List der Vernunft”), describing the phenomenon that progress in history is often promoted unintendedly by people following unreflected passions or selfish motives (Hegel 2016 [1837], pp. 70–80).

  2. Neo-Keynesian Economics formed the mainstream of macroeconomics from the 1950s to the 1970s. It was developed based on Keynes’s writings, by modelizing his core ideas and harmonizing them with neoclassical theory. A main result was the IS-LM model (“neoclassical synthesis”), developed by Hicks (Coddington 1979). From a Neo-Keynesian perspective, output is determined by supply-side factors in the long run, but economic growth can be distorted by disequilibria in the short run, making state intervention necessary. New Keynesian economics was developed in the 1980s and 1990s with the purpose of countering criticism of Keynesian thoughts by monetarist and new classical economists (Gordon 1990). It aims to present microeconomic foundations for Keynesian theory, referring to market inefficiencies. Post-Keynesian economics is based on the assumption that Keynes’s theory was seriously misconstrued by Neo-Keynesian and New Keynesian economics, due to their inherent idea of long-term market equilibria. From a Post-Keynesian point of view, free market economies do not tend towards full employment automatically. Thus, Post-Keynesian economists emphasize the state’s function to provide sufficient demand and full employment and point up to the role of income distribution for economic growth and financial stability (Kurz and Salvadori 2010).

  3. https://www.unpri.org/ (last accessed: 29.07.2019).

References

  • Akerlof, G. A., & Shiller, R. J. (2009). Animal spirits: How human psychology drives the economy, and why it matters for global capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. Politics, Retrieved July 29, 2019 from https://www.gutenberg.org/files/6762/6762-h/6762-h.htm.

  • Bateman, B. W. (1988). G. E. Moore and J. M. Keynes: A missing chapter in the history of the expected utility model. American Economic Review, 78(5), 1098–1106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell Pickford, H. (2018). Structuring and disseminating responsible investment values in wealth funds. Saïd Business School WP 2018-11. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3161983.

  • Chambers, D., & Dimson, E. (2013). Retrospectives: John Maynard Keynes, investment innovator. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(3), 213–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarkin, J. E., & Cangioni, L. C. (2016). Impact investing: A primer and review of the literature. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 6(2), 135–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coddington, A. (1979). Hicks’s contribution to Keynesian economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 17, 970–988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, T. E., Weston, J. F., & Shastri, K. (2005). Financial theory and corporate policy (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornand, C., & Gimet, C. (2012). The 2007–2008 financial crisis: Is there evidence of disaster myopia? Emerging Markets Review, 13(3), 301–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, C. (2018). Elevating the role of divestment in socially responsible investing. Journal of Business Ethics, 153, 465–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dow, A., & Dow, S. C. (2013). Animal spirits revisited. Capitalism and Society, 6(2), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, S. P. (2004). Keynes, uncertainty and the competitive process. In W. J. Samuels & J. E. Biddle (Eds.), Research in the history of economic thought and methodology: A research annual (pp. 65–92). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, G. A., & Habbard, P. (2013). Speculation and sovereign debt: An insidious interaction. In M. H. Wolfson & G. A. Epstein (Eds.), The handbook of the political economy of financial crises (pp. 326–356). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farhi, E., & Tirole, J. (2012). Collective moral hazard, maturity mismatch, and systemic bailouts. The American Economic Review, 102, 60–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederiksen, C. S., & Nielsen, M. E. J. (2013). The ethical foundations for CSR. In J. O. Okpara & S. O. Idiwu (Eds.), Corporate Social Responsibility Challenges, Opportunities and Strategies for 21st Century Leaders (pp. 17–33). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gennaioli, N., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (2015). Neglected risks: The psychology of financial crises. The American Economic Review, 105(5), 310–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R. T. (1990). What Is New-Keynesian economics? Journal of Economic Literature, 28, 1115–1171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, R. M., & Scharfstein, D. S. (2013). The growth of modern finance. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(2), 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez, G. & Philippon, T. (2016). Investment-less growth: An empirical investigation, NBER Working Paper 22897.

  • Harrod, R. F. (1951). The life of John Maynard Keynes. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecker, C. (2017). From “Usury” to “Financial Alchemy”: Martin Luther’s economic writings revisited. Journal of Contextual Economics, 137(3), 301–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecker, C. (2018). Wenn Renditeziele in Kosten umdefiniert werden: Narrative economics in der Praxis. Wirtschaftsdienst, 98(12), 890–894.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F. (2016 [1837]). Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Geschichte. Stuttgart: Reclam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hryckiewicz, A. (2014). What do we know about the impact of government interventions in the banking sector? An assessment of various bailout programs on bank behaviour. Journal of Banking & Finance, 46, 246–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • IFC (2019). Investing for impact: Operating principles for impact management. Retrieved July 29, 2019 from https://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/Topics_Ext_Content/IFC_External_Corporate_Site/Impact-Investing.

  • Jagannathan, R., Meier, I. & Tarhan, V. (2011). The cross-section of hurdle rates for capital budgeting: An empirical analysis of survey data, NBER Working Paper No. 16770.

  • Jagannathan, R., Ravikumar, A., & Sammon, M. (2018). Environmental, social, and governance criteria: Why investors should care. Journal of Investment Management, 16(1), 18–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1993 [1785]). Grounding for the metaphysics of morals (J. W. Ellington, Trans., 3rd ed.). Cambridge: Hackett.

  • Kaul, I. (2012). Global public goods: Explaining their underprovision. Journal of International Economic Law, 15(3), 729–750.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J. M. (1921). A treatise on probability. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J. M. (1926). The end of Laissez-Faire. London: Hogarth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J. M. (1930a). A treatise on money, vol. 1: The pure theory of money. London/Basingstoke: Macmillan 1971 (The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, Vol. 5).

  • Keynes, J. M. (1930b). A treatise on money, vol. 2: The applied theory of money. London/Basingstoke: Macmillan 1971 (The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, Vol. 6).

  • Keynes, J. M. (1936). The general theory of employment, interest, and money. London: Macmillan and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J. M. (1937). The general theory of employment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 51(2), 209–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J. M. (1938). My early beliefs. Two memoirs. Dr Melchior: a defeated enemy and my early beliefs (pp. 78–103). London: Rupert Hart-Davis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J. M. (1969). Economic possibilities for our grandchildren. In The goal of economic growth, ed. with introduction by Edmund S. Phelps, pp. 209–214. New York: Norton.

  • Keynes, J. M. (2013). Economic articles and correspondence: investment and editorial. In D. Moggridge (Ed.) The collected writings of John Maynard Keynes (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press for the Royal Economic Society.

  • Kindleberger, C. P. (1988). Economic responsibility. The international economic order: Essays on financial crisis and international public goods (pp. 196–210). New York: Harvester/Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, M. (2016). The end of alchemy. Money, banking and the future of the global economy. London: Little, Brown Book Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knell, M. (2015). Schumpeter, Minsky and the financial instability hypothesis. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 25, 293–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty, and profit. Boston/New York: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (2018). Good enough for government work? Macroeconomics since the crisis. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 34(1–2), 156–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurz, H. D., & Salvadori, N. (2010). The post-Keynesian theories of growth and distribution. In M. Setterfield (Ed.), Handbook of alternative theories of economic growth (pp. 95–107). Cheltenham: Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazonick, W. (2013). From innovation to financialisation: How shareholder value ideology is destroying the US economy. In M. H. Wolfson & G. A. Epstein (Eds.), The handbook of the political economy of financial crises (pp. 491–511). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzucato, M. (2018). The value of everything: Making and taking in the global economy. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minsky, H. P. (1982). Can “it” happen again? Essays on instability and finance. New York: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minsky, H. P. (2008). John Maynard Keynes. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishkin, F. S. (2019). The economics of money, banking, and financial markets (12th ed.). Harlow: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. E. (1959). Principia ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (1988). Non-relative virtues: An Aristotelian approach. Midwest Studies of Philosophy, 13(1), 32–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (2001). Upheavals of thought: The intelligence of emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelps, E. S. (2009). Toward a model of innovation and performance along the lines of Knight, Keynes, Hayek, and M. Polanyi. In Z. J. Acs, D. B. Audretsch, & R. J. Strom (Eds.), Entrepreneurship, growth, and public policy (pp. 35–70). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philippon, T. (2012). Has the U.S. finance industry become less efficient? On the theory and measurement of financial intermediation, NBER Working Paper No. 18077.

  • Philippon, T., & Reshef, A. (2013). An international look at the growth of modern finance. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(2), 73–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puaschunder, J. M. (2017). Socially responsible investment as emergent risk prevention and means to imbue trust in the post-2008/2009 world financial crisis economy. In O. M. Lehner (Ed.), Routledge handbook of social and sustainable finance (pp. 222–238). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, A. (1986). Creating shareholder value. The new standard for business performance. New York: Collier Macmillan Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, A. (2011). Saving capitalism from short-termism. How to build long-term value and take back our financial future. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schich, S., & Lindh, S. (2012). Implicit guarantees for bank debt: Where do we stand? OECD Financial Market Trends, 1, 45–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenmaker, D., & Schramade, W. (2019). Principles of sustainable finance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1943). Capitalism in the Post-War World. In R. V. Clemence (Ed.), Essays of J. A. Schumpeter (pp. 170–183). Cambridge: Addison Wesley Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1949). Economic theory and entrepreneurial history. In R. V. Clemence (Ed.), Essays of J. A. Schumpeter (pp. 248–266). Cambridge: Addison Wesley Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1950). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy (3rd ed.). London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiller, R. J. (2012). Finance and the good society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiller, R. J. (2015). Irrational exuberance (3rd ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirakawa, M. (2012). International Financial Stability as a Public good. Keynote address at a high-level seminar co-hosted by the bank of Japan and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in Tokyo. Retrieved July 29, 2019 from https://www.boj.or.jp/en/announcements/press/koen_2012/data/ko121014a.pdf.

  • Skidelsky, R. (1977). The revolt against the Victorians. The end of the Keynesian era: Essays on the disintegration of the Keynesian political economy (pp. 1–9). London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skidelsky, R. (1983). John Maynard Keynes. Vol. 1: Hopes Betrayed 1883–1920 (Vol. 1). London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skidelsky, R. (2009). Keynes: The return of the master. London: Penguin Books Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1759). The theory of moral sentiments. Retrieved July 29, 2019 from https://www.econlib.org/library/Smith/smMS3.html

  • Smith, A., (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of Nations. Retrieved July 29, 2019 from https://www.econlib.org/library/Smith/smWN.html

  • Stiglitz, J. E. (2014). Reconstructing macroeconomic theory to manage economic policy, NBER Working Paper 20517. Retrieved July 29, 2019 from https://www.nber.org/papers/w20517.

  • Stockhammer, E. (2013). Financialization and the global economy. In M. H. Wolfson & G. A. Epstein (Eds.), The handbook of the political economy of financial crises (pp. 512–525). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trovato, E. (2018). Sustainable investment. Private bankers respond as clients go green. The Banker, 2018, 74–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, P. (2016). The design and governance of financial stability regimes: a common-resource problem that challenges technical know-how, democratic accountability and international coordination. Retrieved July 31, 2019 from https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/conferences/shared/pdf/20170511_2nd_mp_policy/Tucker-The_Design_and_Governance_of_Financial_Stability_Regimes .en.pdf.

  • Von Wallis, M., & Klein, C. (2015). Ethical requirement and financial interest: a literature review on socially responsible investing. Business Research, 8(1), 61–98.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hamburg, Germany

    Christian Hecker

Authors
  1. Christian Hecker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Hecker.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by the author.

Informed Consent

The author did not request informed consent, as his study did not involve any participants whose individual rights could be infringed.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hecker, C. How Should Responsible Investors Behave? Keynes’s Distinction Between Entrepreneurship and Speculation Revisited. J Bus Ethics 171, 459–473 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04427-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04427-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation