Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comments On `Analyzing Argumentative Discourse from a Rhetorical Perspective: Defining "Person" and "Human Life" in Constitutional Disputes Over Abortion'

  • Published:
Argumentation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

REFERENCES

  • Crawshay-Williams, R.: 1957, Methods and Criteria of Reasoning.An Inquiry into the Structure of Controversy, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eemeren, F. H. van and P. Houtlosser: 1999, ‘Strategic Manoeuvring in Argumentative Discourse’, Discourse Studies 1(4), 479-497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naess, A.: 1966, Communication and Argument.Elements of Aplied Semantics(English translation of En del elementaere logiske emner. Universitetsforlaget, Oslo, 1947), Allen and Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Speech Communication, Argumentation Theory and Rhetoric, University of Amsterdam, Spuistraat 134, 1012 VB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans

Authors
  1. A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Henkemans, A.F.S. Comments On `Analyzing Argumentative Discourse from a Rhetorical Perspective: Defining "Person" and "Human Life" in Constitutional Disputes Over Abortion'. Argumentation 14, 333–338 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007813331847

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007813331847

Keywords

Search

Navigation