Skip to main content
Log in

Editorial: Research ethics

  • Editorial Introduction
  • Published:
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Emanuel, E.J., D. Wendler and C. Grady: 2000, ‘What Makes Clinical Research Ethical?', JAMA 283(20), 2701-2711.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, R.J.: 2002, ‘Placebo-Controls in Clinical Trials When There Are Known Effective Treatments', in: F. Lolas and L. Agar (eds.), Interfaces Between Bioethics and the Empirical Social Sciences. Chile: Regional Program on Bioethics, Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization, pp. 79-89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lie, R.K.: 2002, ‘The HIV Perinatal Transmission Studies and the Debate About the Revision of the Helsinki Declaration', in: R.K. Lie and P.T. Schotsmans (eds.), Healthy Thoughts. European Perspectives on Health Care Ethics. Leuven/Paris/Sterling: Leuven, pp. 189-206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Review: 2001, ‘European Union Clinical Trials Directive', Bulletin of Medical Ethics July, 13-24.

  • Singer, E.A. and M. Müllner: 2002, ‘Implications of the EU Directive on Clinical Trials for Emergency Medicine', British Medical Journal 324, 1169-1170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, H.K.A.: 2001, ‘Non-therapeutic Research in the EU in Adults Incapable of Giving Consent?’, The Lancet 357, 818-819.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Henk, A. Editorial: Research ethics. Med Health Care Philos 6, 1–3 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022596812980

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022596812980

Navigation