skip to main content
research-article

Authoritarianism and anonymity: continuing to explore the "scandal in academia"

Published:22 January 2021Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The Scandal in Academia [32] [33] [34] [35] is an extended fictional case-study intended for use as a teaching and discussion aid for educational practitioners looking to introduce elements of computer ethics into their curricula. Inspired by Epstein [17] [18] it is a full-cycle scenario involving many individuals which touches upon the complexity and interrelations of modern computer ethics. It has been trailed and evaluated as a teaching tool by the authors [36] and with multiple groups since then. However its utility as a general resource is limited without the academic context that supports deeper investigation of the material. It is to address this issue that the authors offer this commentary on the Scandal, with a focus on the ninth and tenth newspaper items presented within. Specifically these are Culture of Fear and Nepotism at University and Witch-Hunts at the University - IT Crackdown Causes Criticisms.

References

  1. Jesse Abdenour. 2017. Digital gumshoes: Investigative journalists' use of social media in television news reporting. Digital Journalism 5, 4 (2017), 472--492.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Giovanni Abramo, Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo, and Francesco Rosati. 2016. Gender bias in academic recruitment. Scientometrics 106, 1 (2016), 119--141. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Dominic Abrams, Margaret Wetherell, Sandra Cochrane, Michael A Hogg, and John C Turner. 1990. Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: Self-categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity and group polarization. British journal of social psychology 29, 2 (1990), 97--119.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Catherine Ashcraft, Brad McLain, and Elizabeth Eger. 2016. Women in tech: The facts. National Center for Women & Technology (NCWIT).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Janis Bailey, David Peetz, Glenda Strachan, Gillian Whitehouse, and Kaye Broadbent. 2016. Academic pay loadings and gender in Australian universities. Journal of Industrial Relations 58, 5 (2016), 647--668.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Christoph Bösch, Benjamin Erb, Frank Kargl, Henning Kopp, and Stefan Pfattheicher. 2016. Tales from the dark side: Privacy dark strategies and privacy dark patterns. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies 2016, 4 (2016), 237--254.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Aras Bozkurt and Ramesh C Sharma. 2020. Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to CoronaVirus pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education 15, 1 (2020), i--vi.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Sara Branch, Sheryl Ramsay, and Michelle Barker. 2013. Workplace bullying, mobbing and general harassment: A review. International Journal of Management Reviews 15, 3 (2013), 280--299.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. David L Brunsma, David G Embrick, and Jean H Shin. 2017. Graduate students of color: Race, racism, and mentoring in the white waters of academia. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity 3, 1 (2017), 1--13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Hazel Bryan. 2017. Developing the political citizen: How teachers are navigating the statutory demands of the Counter-Terrorism and Security Act 205 and the Prevent Duty. Education, citizenship and social justice 12, 3 (2017), 213--226.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Quick Take Catalyst. 2017. Women in academia. Catalyst, Quick Take (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Tom Christensen, Åse Gornitzka, and Francisco O Ramirez. 2019. Reputation Management, Social Embeddedness, and Rationalization of Universities. In Universities as Agencies. Springer, 3--39.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Efthymios Constantinides and Marc C Zinck Stagno. 2011. Potential of the social media as instruments of higher education marketing: A segmentation study. Journal of marketing for higher education 21, 1 (2011), 7--24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Mark Davies. 2018. Educational background and access to legal academia. Legal Studies 38, 1 (2018), 120--146.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. William E Donald, Yehuda Baruch, and Melanie Ashleigh. 2019. The undergraduate self-perception of employability: human capital, careers advice, and career ownership. Studies in Higher Education 44, 4 (2019), 599--614.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Helen Donelan. 2016. Social media for professional development and networking opportunities in academia. Journal of further and higher education 40, 5 (2016), 706--729.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Richard G Epstein. 1994. The case of the killer robot (part 1). ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society 24, 3 (1994), 20--28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Richard G Epstein. 1994. The case of the killer robot (part 2). ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society 24, 4 (1994), 12--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Joëlle Fanghanel and Peter John. 2015. Editors' conclusion. Dimensions of Marketisation in Higher Education (2015), 233.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. F Scott Fitzgerald. 1945. The Crack-up, ed. Edmund Wilson (New York: New Directions, 1945) 89 (1945).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Sam Friedman, Mike Savage, Daniel McArthur, and Katharina Hecht. 2019. Elites in the UK: Pulling Away? Social Mobility, Geographic Mobility and Elite Occupations. (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Amanda Gearing. 2014. Investigative journalism in a socially networked world. Pacific Journalism Review 20, 1 (2014), 61--75.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Joanna Gilmore. 2017. Teaching terrorism: the impact of the Counter-Terrorism and Security Act 2015 on academic freedom. The Law Teacher 51, 4 (2017), 515--524.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Henry A Giroux. 2006. Academic freedom under fire: The case for critical pedagogy. College Literature (2006), 1--42.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Anne Graham, Mary Ann Powell, and Julia Truscott. 2016. Facilitating student well-being: relationships do matter. Educational Research 58, 4 (2016), 366--383.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Steven Greer and LC Bell. 2018. Counter-terrorist law in British universities: a review of the" Prevent" debate. Public Law 2018, January (2018), 84--104.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Irena Grugulis and Dimitrinka Stoyanova. 2012. Social capital and networks in film and TV: Jobs for the boys? Organization Studies 33, 10 (2012), 1311--1331.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Eszter Hargittai and Alice Marwick. 2016. "What can I really do?" Explaining the privacy paradox with online apathy. International Journal of Communication 10 (2016), 21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. David Harvie. 2000. Alienation, class and enclosure in UK universities. Capital & Class 24, 2 (2000), 103--132.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Kenneth J Heineman. 1992. Campus wars: The peace movement at American state universities in the Vietnam era. NYU Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Michael Heron, Vicki L Hanson, and Ian Ricketts. 2013. Open source and accessibility: advantages and limitations. Journal of interaction Science 1, 1 (2013), 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Michael James Heron and Pauline Belford. 2014. Ethics in context: a scandal in academia. ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society 44, 2 (2014), 20--51. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Michael James Heron and Pauline Belford. 2015. Power and perception in the scandal in academia. ACM SIGCAS computers and society 45, 2 (2015), 11--19. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Michael James Heron and Pauline Belford. 2016. The quantified university: an analysis of the Scandal in Academia. ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society 46, 3 (2016), 28--44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Michael James Heron and Pauline Belford. 2018. Disclosure and disavowal: professional issues in the scandal in academia. ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society 47, 4 (2018), 29--45. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Michael James Heron and Pauline Helen Belford. 2015. A practitioner reflection on teaching computer ethics with case studies and psychology. Brookes eJournal of Learning and Teaching 7, 1 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Michael James Heron, Pauline Helen Belford, Hayley Reid, and Michael Crabb. 2018. Eighteen Months of Meeple Like Us: An Exploration into the State of Board Game Accessibility. The Computer Games Journal 7, 2 (2018), 75--95.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Michael James Heron, Pauline Helen Belford, Hayley Reid, and Michael Crabb. 2018. Meeple centred design: a heuristic toolkit for evaluating the accessibility of tabletop games. The Computer Games Journal 7, 2 (2018), 97--114.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Charles Hodges, Stephanie Moore, Barb Lockee, Torrey Trust, and Aaron Bond. 2020. The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review 27 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Liza Howe-Walsh and Sarah Turnbull. 2016. Barriers to women leaders in academia: tales from science and technology. Studies in Higher Education 41, 3 (2016), 415--428.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Risa L Lieberwitz. 2002. The corporatization of the university: distance learning at the cost of academic freedom. BU Pub. Int. LJ 12 (2002), 73.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Lili Luo, Yuan Wang, and Lifeng Han. 2013. Marketing via social media: a case study. Library Hi Tech (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Juan M Madera, Michelle R Hebl, Heather Dial, Randi Martin, and Virgina Valian. 2019. Raising doubt in letters of recommendation for academia: gender differences and their impact. Journal of Business and Psychology 34, 3 (2019), 287--303.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Elena Makarova, Belinda Aeschlimann, and Walter Herzog. 2016. Why is the pipeline leaking? Experiences of young women in STEM vocational education and training and their adjustment strategies. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training 8, 1 (2016), 2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Philipp K Masur. 2019. New Media Environments and Their Threats. In Situational Privacy and Self-Disclosure. Springer, 13--31.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Alex McKenzie, Lynden Griggs, Rick Snell, and Gary D Meyers. 2018. The myth of the teaching-research nexus. Legal Educ. Rev. 28 (2018), 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Lane Busby McLelland. 2019. The campus speech wars: the problem of freedom in higher education. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Alabama Libraries.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Tony McNeill. 2012. "Don't affect the share price": social media policy in higher education as reputation management. Research in Learning Technology 20 (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Damian Mellifont, Jennifer Smith-Merry, Helen Dickinson, Gwynnyth Llewellyn, Shane Clifton, Jo Ragen, Martin Raffaele, and Paul Williamson. 2019. The ableism elephant in the academy: a study examining academia as informed by Australian scholars with lived experience. Disability & Society 34, 7-8 (2019), 1180--1199.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Friederike Mengel, Jan Sauermann, and Ulf Zölitz. 2019. Gender bias in teaching evaluations. Journal of the European Economic Association 17, 2 (2019), 535--566.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Ruth Milkman. 2017. A new political generation: Millennials and the post-2008 wave of protest. American Sociological Review 82, 1 (2017), 1--31.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Danny Miller, Xiaowei Xu, and Vikas Mehrotra. 2015. When is human capital a valuable resource? The performance effects of Ivy League selection among celebrated CEOs. Strategic Management Journal 36, 6 (2015), 930--944.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Alessandra Minello. 2020. The pandemic and the female academic. Nature (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Laura A Pasquini and Nicholas Evangelopoulos. 2017. Sociotechnical stewardship in higher education: a field study of social media policy documents. Journal of computing in higher education 29, 2 (2017), 218--239.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Jeffrey Pomerantz, Carolyn Hank, and Cassidy R Sugimoto. 2015. The state of social media policies in higher education. PLoS One 10, 5 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Karen D Pyke. 2018. Institutional betrayal: Inequity, discrimination, bullying, and retaliation in academia. Sociological Perspectives 61, 1 (2018), 5--13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Erik Ringmar. 2007. A blogger's manifesto: free speech and censorship in the age of the Internet. Anthem Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Richard Rutter, Stuart Roper, and Fiona Lettice. 2016. Social media interaction, the university brand and recruitment performance. Journal of Business Research 69, 8 (2016), 3096--3104.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Keith Spiller, Imran Awan, and Andrew Whiting. 2018. 'What does terrorism look like?': university lecturers' interpretations of their Prevent duties and tackling extremism in UK universities. Critical Studies on Terrorism 11, 1 (2018), 130--150.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Jonathan Wai and Kaja Perina. 2018. Expertise in journalism: Factors shaping a cognitive and culturally elite profession. Journal of Expertise 1, 1 (2018), 57--78.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. John K Wilson. 2015. Patriotic correctness: Academic freedom and its enemies. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Authoritarianism and anonymity: continuing to explore the "scandal in academia"

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society
        ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society  Volume 49, Issue 3
        December 2020
        28 pages
        ISSN:0095-2737
        DOI:10.1145/3447913
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2021 Copyright is held by the owner/author(s)

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 22 January 2021

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader