Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Collaborative learning in engineering ethics

  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses collaborative learning and its use in an elective course on ethics in engineering. Collaborative learning is a form of active learning in which students learn with and from one another in small groups. The benefits of collaborative learning include improved student performance and enthusiasm for learning, development of communication skills, and greater student appreciation of the importance of judgment and collaboration in solving real-world problems such as those encountered in engineering ethics. Collaborative learning strategies employed in the course include informal small group discussions/problem solving, role-playing exercises, and cooperative student group projects, including peer grading. Student response to these techniques has been highly favorable. Realizing the benefits of collaborative learning is a challenge to both teachers, who must give up some control in the classroom, and students, who must be willing to take greater responsibility for their learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bruffee, K.A. (1987) The art of collaborative learning. Change (March/April): 42–47.

  2. Felder, R.M. & Brent, R. (1995) Effective Teaching: A Workshop, North Carolina State University, Raleigh.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T. & Smith, K.A. (1991) Active Learning: Cooperation in the College Classroom, Interaction Book Company, Edina, Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Werhane, P.H. (1991) Engineers and management: the challenge of the Challenger incident. Journal of Business Ethics 10: 605–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Herkert, J.R. (1991) Safety, ethics and legal aspects of engineering: a collaborative learning approach, in: Proceedings, 1991 Annual Conference: Challenges of a Changing World. American Society for Engineering Education, Washington DC, pp. 896–898.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Herkert, J.R. (1997) Integrating engineering ethics and public policy: three examples, in: Luegenbichl, H., Neeley, K. and Ollis, D. F. (eds.) Liberal Education in 21st Century Engineering, Peter Lang, New York (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Winner, L. (1991) Engineering ethics and political imagination, in: Johnson, D. (ed) Ethical Issues in Engineering, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, pp 376–385.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Vanderburg, W.H. (1995) Preventive engineering: strategy for dealing with negative social and environmental implications of technology. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice 121: 155–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Course web page, Ethics in Engineering. Available on the World Wide Web: http://www4.ncsu.edu/unity/users/j/jherkert/mds320.html.

  10. Herkert, J.R. (1997) STS for engineers: integrating engineering, humanities and social sciences, in: Luegenbiehl, H., Neeley, K. and Ollis, D. F. (eds.) Liberal Education in 21st Century Engineering, Peter Lang, New York (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Anonymous (1983) I gave up ethics—to eat, in: Schaub, J. & Pavlovic, K. (eds) Engineering Professionalism and Ethics, Wiley, New York, pp 233–238.

  12. Unger, S. (1994) Controlling Technology: Ethics and the Responsible Engineer, 2nd Ed., Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ladd, J. (1991) The quest for a code of professional ethics, in: Johnson, D. (ed) Ethical Issues in Engineering, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, pp 130–136.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Whitbeck, C. (1996) Ethics as design: doing justice to moral problems. problems. Hastings Center Report (May–June): 9–16.

  15. Pritchard, M. (1992) Teaching engineering ethics: a case study approach. Available on the World Wide Web: http://ethics.tamu.edu/pritchar/an-intro.htm.

  16. Meyers, C. & Jones, T.B. (1993) Promoting Active Learning, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Herkert, J.R. (1997) Making connections: engineering ethics on the World Wide Web. IEEE Transactions on Education 40 (4): (in press).

  18. The World Wide Web Ethics Center for Engineering and Science. Available on the World Wide Web: http://ethics.cwru.edu/

  19. Engineering Ethics. Available on the World Wide Web: http://ethics.tamu.edu/.

  20. Shenker, J. I., Goss, S. A. & Bernstein, D.A. (1996) Instructor’s Resource Manual for Psychology, Fourth Edition, Houghton-Mifflin, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

An earlier version of this paper was presented by the author at a mini-conference, Practicing and Teaching Ethics in Engineering and Computing, held during the Sixth Annual Meeting of the Association for Practical and Professional Ethics, Washington, D.C., March 8–9, 1997

The author teaches courses in Science, Technology and Society and is Director of the Benjamin Franklin Scholars Program, a dual-degree program in engineering and humanities/social sciences.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Herkert, J.R. Collaborative learning in engineering ethics. SCI ENG ETHICS 3, 447–462 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-997-0047-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-997-0047-x

Keywords

Navigation