Abstract
This commentary on Hugh Lacey's paper emphasises the material aspects of the social structure within which technological control takes place. It is suggested here that when the example of the Green Revolution is examined in detail a clear-cut distinction between material and social constraints/possibilities is misleading. I propose a material analysis of the control situation. This analysis is placed within the material framework of the social structure within which the control system is employed. By widening of the analysis even further it is hoped that the environmental issues of the Green Revolution that concern Vandana Shiva can be addressed. I provide a glimpse of how such an account should proceed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Carson, R.: 1963, Silent Spring, Hamish Hamilton, London.
Dyke, C.: 1988, The Evolutionary Dynamics of Complex Systems: A Study in Biosocial Complexity, Oxford University Press, New York.
George, S.: 1988, A Fate Worse Than Debt, Penguin Books, London.
Margulis, L.:1995, ‘A Pox Called Man’, in T. Wakeford and M. Walters (eds.) Science for the Earth: Can Science Make the World a Better Place?, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester. 19-37.
Shiva, V.: 1991, The Violence of the Green Revolution: Third World Agriculture, Ecology and Politics, Zed Books, London.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Herfel, W.E. On Social and Material Aspects of Technological Control. Science & Education 8, 55–62 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008667212790
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008667212790