Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Universal Compulsory Service in Medical Research

  • Published:
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite the prominence of healthcare-relatedconcerns in public debate, the ground remainsinfertile for the idea of conscripting citizensinto medical research. Reluctance to entertainthe thought of a system where nearly everyonecould be selected for service might reflectuncertainty about what the project wouldinvolve. There might also be a fear that themore crucial issue is how to protect researchsubjects within current, voluntary systems. Nodoubt reluctance to explore a system ofuniversal service results from the common hopethat each of us might avoid research in anycapacity besides researcher. A system of fullcivic participation might, however, avoid manyof the usual objections. Ethics regulations,including informed-consent guidelines, couldfor the most part remain in force. Though thesystem would compel people to serve, it couldremain responsive to principles of autonomy andjustice if it centered on broad publiceducation, community representation, and alottery-type selection process. The systemcould draw from the largest possiblecross-section of society, and offer conscriptsthe widest possible range of service. In thisway, a compulsory system might reconcile theexpectations about healthcare with researchneeds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Abramson, J. “Juries and Local Justice.” In: Sarat, A., Villa, D.R., eds. Liberal Modernism and Democratic Individuality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996, pp. 265–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, A.E. “Rights, Obligations, and the Special Importance of Health Care.” In: Bole, T.J., Bondeson, W.B., eds. Rights to Health Care. Dordrecht, Holland: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991, pp. 169–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, A. If I Were a Rich Man, Could I Buy a Pancreas? Bloomington, IL: Indiana University Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capron, A.M. “Legal Considerations Affecting Clinical Pharmacological Studies in Children.” Clinical Research 21 (1973): 141–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, N. Just Health Care. NY: Cambridge University Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fried, C. Medical Experimentation: Personal Integrity and Social Policy.NY: Elsevier Publishing, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J.P., McPeek, B., Mosteller, F. “Statistics and Ethics in Surgery and Anesthesia.” Science 198 (1977): 684–689.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, R.M. “Justice and the Claims of Future Generations.” In: Shelp, E.E., ed. Justice and Health Care. Dordrecht, Holland: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1981, pp. 193–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. “The Survival Lottery.” Philosophy 50 (1975): 81–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonas, H. “Philosophical Reflections on Experimenting with Human Subjects.” In: Freund, P. A., ed. Experimentation with Human Subjects. NY: George Braziller, 1970, pp. 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lantos, J.D. Do We Still Need Doctors? NY: Routledge, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquis, D. “Leaving Therapy to Chance.” Hastings Center Report 13 (1983): 40–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, R.A. How Brave a New World? NY: Doubleday, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P. Practical Ethics. NY: Cambridge University Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. Liberalism and Affirmative Obligations. NY: Oxford University Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Temkin, L.S. “Justice and Equality: Some Questions About Scope.” In: Paul, E.F., Miller, F.D., Paul, J., eds. The Just Society. NY: Cambridge University Press, 1995, pp. 72–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomasma, D.C. “The Goals of Medicine and Society.” In: Brock, D.H., ed. The Culture of Biomedicine. Newark, DE: University of Delaware Press, 1984, pp. 34–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vere, D. “Volunteers: The Susceptible and the Disadvantaged.” In: Close, B., Combes, R., Hubbard, A., Illingworth, J., eds. Volunteers in Research and Testing. London: Taylor & Francis, 1997, pp. 67–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M. Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. NY: Basic Books, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wartofsky, M.W. “Medical Knowledge as a Social Product: Rights, Risks, and Responsibilities.” In: Bondeson, W.B., Englehardt, H.T., Spicker, S.F., White, J.M., eds. New Knowledge in the Biomedical Sciences: Some Moral Implications of Its Acquisition Possession and Use. Dordrecht, Holland: Kluwer Academic Publishing, 1982, pp.113–130.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, Montclair State University, Upper Montclair, NJ, 07043, USA

    C.D. Herrera

Authors
  1. C.D. Herrera
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Herrera, C. Universal Compulsory Service in Medical Research. Theor Med Bioeth 24, 215–231 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024888622358

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024888622358

Search

Navigation