Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparative study of theSp (2,R) and theSp(6,R) models and an application to theBa chain of isotopes

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigate the Sp(2, R) model for light and heavy nuclei and compare it to recent applications of the Sp(6, R) model. The same Hamiltonian is used and the basis states will have good angular momentum. We not only confirm that the restricted space of the Sp(6, R) model gives the dominant contribution but also that there is no practical difference from the Sp(6, R) model calculations. The Sp(2, R) model is then applied to the chain of Ba-isotopes which show, according to a recent application of the geometrical model, a dominant prolate behavior with an important γ-unstable component. They represent limiting cases where the Sp(2, R) model can be put to an extreme test.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. G. Meyer,Phys. Rev. 75, 1969 (1949). O. Haxel, J. H. D. Jensen, and H. E. Suess,Phys. Rev. 75, 1766 (1949).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. D. C. Zheng, J. P. Vary, and B. R. Barrett,Phys. Rev. C 50, 2841 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. S. G. Nilsson,K. Dansk. Vidensk. Selsk. Mat.-Fys. Med. (Skr.) 29, 16 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. P. Elliott,Proc. R. Soc. London A 245, 128, 562 (1958).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Harvey,Adv. Nucl. Phys. 1, 67 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  6. K. T. Hecht and A. Adler,Nucl. Phys. A 137, 129 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. A. Arima, M. Harvey, and K. Shimizu,Phys. Lett. B 30, 517 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. J. P. Draayer and C. Bahri,Rev. Mex. Fís. 40 (Suppl. 1), 12 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  9. O. L. Weaver, R. Y. Cusson, and L. C. Biedenharn,Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 102, 493 (1976).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. B. Buck, L. C. Biedenharn, and R. Y. Cusson,Nucl. Phys. A317, 205 (1979).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. D. J. Rowe,Rep. Prog. Phys. 48, 1419 (1985) and references therein. D. J. Rowe,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 17, 265 (1996) and references therein.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. G. F. Filipov, V. I. Ovcharenko, and Yu. F. Smirnov, inMicroscopic Theory of Collective Motion (in Russian) (Naukova Dumka, Kiev, 1981). G. F. Filipov and Yu. F. Smirnov,Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 27, 39 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  13. V. Vanagas, inGroup Theory and Its Applications in Physics-1980 (A.I.P. Conference Procedings No. 71), T. Seligman, ed. (American Institute of Physics, 1981), p. 220.

  14. M. Moshinsky and C. Quesne,J. Math. Phys. 12, 1772 (1971).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. O. Castaños and J. P. Draayer,Nucl. Phys. A 491, 349 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. J. Carvalho and D. J. Rowe,Nucl. Phys. A 548, 1 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. O. Castaños, M. Moshinsky, and C. Quesne,Phys. Rev. Lett. B 277, 238 (1992). C. Bahri, J. P. Draayer, and S. A. Moszkowski,Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 2133 (1992).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. O. Castaños, P. O. Hess, P. Rochford, and J. P. Draayer,Nucl. Phys. A 524, 469 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. D. Troltenier, J. P. Draayer, P. O. Hess, and O. Castaños,Nucl. Phys. A 576, 351 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. F. Arickx, P. Van Leuven, and M. Bouten,Nucl. Phys. A 252, 416 (1975), F. Arickx,Nucl. Phys A 268, 347 (1976). F. Arickx, J. Broeckhove, and E. Deumens,Nucl. Phys. A 318, 269 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. O. Castaños, E. Chacón, A. Frank, P. O. Hess, and M. Moshinsky,J. Math. Phys. 23, 2537 (1982).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. E. Chacón, P. O. Hess, and M. Moshinsky,J. math. Phys. 30, 970 (1989) and references therein.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. P. Petkov, A. Dewald, and W. Andrejtscheff,Phys. Rev C 51, 2511 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. J. M. Eisenberg and W. Greiner, inNuclear Theory I: Nuclear Models 3rd ed. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  25. D. Troltenier, J. A. Maruhn, W. Greiner, and P. O. Hess,Z. Phys. A 343, 25 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. M. Moshinsky and Yu. F. Smirnov, inThe Harmonic Oscillator in Modern Physics (Harwood Academic Publishers, 1996).

  27. O. Castaños, J. P. Draayer, and Y. Leschber,Z. Phys. A 329, 33 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  28. V. Velázquez, P. O. Hess, J. G. Hirsch, and A. Mariano,Phys. Rev. C 55, 1571 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. D. Troltenier, W. Nazarewicz, Z. Szymanski, and J. P. Draayer,Nucl. Phys. A 567, 591 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. O. Castaños, J. P. Draayer, and Y. Leschber,Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 180, 290 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. O. Castaños, J. P. Draayer, and Y. Leschber,Z. Phys. A 329, 33 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  32. P. O. Hess, Fitting routine of theSp (2,R) model (ICN-UNAM, Mexico, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  33. O. Castaños and J. P. Draayer, Fitting routine for theSp(6,R) model (Louisiana State University, U. S. A., 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  34. J. G. Hirsch, D. Troltenier, and J. P. Draayer, private communication.

  35. S. Raman, C. H. Malarkey, W. T. Milner, C. W. Nestor, and P. H. Stelson,Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables 36, 1 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. D. J. Rowe, P. Rochford, and J. Repka,J. Math. Phys. 29, 572 (1988). J. Carvalho, R. LeBlanc, M. Vassanji, D. J. Rowe, and J. B. McGrory,Nucl. Phys. A 452, 240 (1986).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. B. Barrett and J. P. Draayer, Suggestions originated by a discussion at the Workshop on Nuclei under Extreme Conditions (Seattle, U.S.A., October 1995).

  38. P. O. Hess, J. Schmidt, and W. Scheid,Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 240, 22 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares, UNAM, Circuito Exterior, C.U, A.P. 70-543, 04510, México, D.F., Mexico

    P. O. Hess

Authors
  1. P. O. Hess
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Work supported by CONACyt (No. E120-550/95).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hess, P.O. Comparative study of theSp (2,R) and theSp(6,R) models and an application to theBa chain of isotopes. Found Phys 27, 1061–1081 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02551153

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02551153

Keywords

Search

Navigation