Abstract
In this paper I reply to Olimpia Lombardi’s comment on my recent book Reducing Chemistry to Physics: Limits, Models, Consequences.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
This point is also made, from a general view on Nagelian reduction, in the paper by Dizadji-Bahmani et al. (2010) who carefully consider the three Nagelian alternatives.
As she notes, internal realism is mentioned as a possible way out of the dilemma, but not developed further in the book.
I believe Lombardi reads a part of my solution wrong when she states that I advocate causal powers for the noumenon. As a philosopher from the European continent ending up in an anglo-phone/australasian oriented department I have found that there is a tendency in anglophone philosophy to talk about causality without having a theory about it. This strikes me as surely wrong—causality is the end result of at least a story—perhaps further developed into a theory—about how things work. Common sense causality is precisely that: the end result of a perhaps implicit theory of how things work. Elevating it to a metaphysical force on its own is doomed to failure. But I don’t think this debate will ever get resolved.
References
Bechtel, W.: Philosophy of Science: An Overview for Cognitive Science. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1988)
Causey, R.C.: Unity of Science. Reidel, Dordrecht (1977)
Dizadji-Bahmani, F., Frigg, R., Hartmann, S.: Who’s afraid of Nagelian reduction? Erkenntnis 73, 393–412 (2010). doi:10.1007/s10670-010-9239-x
Fazekas, P.: Reconsidering the role of Bridge laws In inter-theoretical reductions. Erkenntnis 71, 303–322 (2009)
Floridi, L.: The Philosophy of Information. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2011)
Hettema, H.: Reducing Chemistry to Physics: Limits, Models, Consequences. Createspace, Seattle (2012)
Klein, C.: Reduction without reductionism: a defence of Nagel on connectability. Philos. Q. 59(234), 39–53 (2009)
Ladyman, J., Ross, D., Spurrett, D., Collier, J.: Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007)
Lakatos, I.: The methodology of scientific research programmes. In: Musgrave, A., Lakatos, I. (eds.) Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge Univerity Press, Cambridge (1970)
Lombardi, O.: Linking chemistry with physics: arguments and counterarguments. Found. Chem. (2013). doi:10.1007/s10698-013-9197-x
Muller, F.A.: Refutability revamped: how quantum mechanics saves the phenomena. Erkenntnis 58(2), 189–211 (2003)
Nagel, E.: The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London (1961)
Primas, H.: Chemistry, Quantum Mechanics and Reductionism. Springer, Berlin (1981)
Putnam, H.: Reason, Truth and History. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1981)
van Riel, R.: Nagelian reduction beyond the Nagel model. Philos. Sci. 78(3), 353–375 (2011)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hettema, H. Linking chemistry with physics: a reply to Lombardi. Found Chem 16, 193–200 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-014-9200-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-014-9200-1