Abstract
In recent publications, Harré and Llored (in: Javenovic (ed) Challenges of cultural psychology, Routledge, London, pp 189–206, 2018a; Philosophy, 93:167–186, 2018b; The analysis of practices, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle upon Tyne, 2019) take the role of philosophy of science as a digging out of the ‘hinges’, that are the tacit elements of a discipline. In this perspective, the philosophy of chemistry consists, at least partly, in making explicit the hinges on which chemistry turns and in examining their origins and logical status. In this paper, we propose to query Harré and Llored’s research approach in the case study of the element chlorine. Whereas most early nineteenth-century textbooks define the element as the endpoint of chemical decomposition, the controversy surrounding the element chlorine reveals implicit criteria that surpass operational indivisibility. From 1810 onwards, Davy argued that chlorine was a simple substance; yet, even though it had been known to be indecomposable using the strongest instruments available, the widespread acceptance of chlorine took until 1816–1818. The main factor that contributed to the resolution of the debate was the discovery of iodine, an analogous element which provided new theoretical coherence between explanations of different phenomena (Chabot, in: Du nouveau dans les sciences. Groupe rech. philos. langag., Université des sciences sociales de Grenoble, St-Martin-d’Hères, pp 121–169, 2006; Golinski in Science as public culture: chemistry and enlightenment in Britain, 1760–1820, Cambridge University Press, New York, 1992; Gray et al. in An element of controversy: the life of chlorine in science, medicine, technology and war, British Society for the History of Science, London, pp 41–72, 2007; Siegfried in Isis 54(2):247–258, 1959). Thus, the idea that elements should qualitatively resemble each other is an implicit belief which appears to have been shared by many prominent chemists of the time, despite the fact that it was not stated as part of the definition of the chemical element. Could we assert that this idea was a ‘hinge’ around which the notion of chemical element revolved? Our talk will answer this question.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bensaude-Vincent, B.: Les Pièges de l’Elémentaire: Contribution à l’Histoire de l’Elément Chimique (PhD). Université Paris 1, Paris, France (1981)
Berthollet, C.-L.: Rapport fait sur un ouvrage de MM. Gay-Lussac et Thénard, ayant pour titre: Recherches Physico-Chimiques, faites sur la pile etc. J. Mines 30, 6–56 (1811)
Berthollet, C.-L.: Note sur la composition de l’acide oxymuriatique. Mém. Phys. Chim. Soc. Arcueil 3, 603–612 (1817)
Berzelius, J.J.: On the nature of muriatic acid. Ann. Philos. 2(10), 254–259 (1813)
Berzelius, J.J.: A comparison of the old and new theories respecting the nature of oxymuriatic acid, to enable us to judge which of the two deserves the preference. Ann. Philos. 7 and 8, 272–280, 429–441, 200–209, 256–264, 470 (1816)
Bunge, M.: The Myth of Simplicity: Problems in Scientific Philosophy. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1963)
Chabot, H.: Les origines d’un nouvel élément chimique: L’affaire du chlore. In: Du nouveau dans les sciences, pp. 121–169. St-Martin-d’Hères: Groupe rech. philos. langag., Université des sciences sociales de Grenoble (2006)
Crosland, M.: In the Shadow of Lavoisier: The Annales de Chimie and the establishment of a new science. The Alden Press, Oxford (1994)
Davy, H.: Researches on the oxymuriatic acid, its nature and combinations; and on the elements of the muriatic acid. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 100, 231–257 (1810a)
Davy, H.: The Bakerian lecture for 1809. On some new electrochemical researches, on various objects, particularly the metallic bodies, from the alkalies, and earths, and on some combinations of hydrogene. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London 100, 16–74 (1810b)
Davy, H.: The Bakerian Lecture. On some of the combinations of oxymuriatic gas and oxygene, and on the chemical relations of these principles, to inflammable bodies. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 101, 1–35 (1811)
Davy, H.: Elements of Chemical Philosophy. J. Johnson, London (1812)
Fisher, A.A.: Inductive reasoning in the context of discovery: analogy as an experimental stratagem in the history and philosophy of science. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. A 69, 23–33 (2018)
Gay-Lussac, L.-J.: Mémoire sur l’iode. Ann. Chim. 91, 5–160 (1814)
Gay-Lussac, L.-J., Thénard, L.-J.: Extrait des mémoires lus à l’institut national, depuis le 7 mars 1808 jusqu’au 27 février 1809. Mém. Phys. Chim. Soc. Arcueil 2, 295–358 (1809)
Golinski, J.: Science as Public Culture: Chemistry and Enlightenment in Britain, 1760–1820. Cambridge University Press, New York (1992)
Gray, T., Coates, R., Akesson, M.: The elementary nature of chlorine. In: Chang, H., Jackson, C. (eds.) An Element of Controversy: The Life of Chlorine in Science, Medicine, Technology and War, pp. 41–72. British Society for the History of Science, London (2007)
Harré, R., Llored, J.-P.: Contingent universals as the expression of a culture. In: Javenovic, G. (ed.) Challenges of Cultural Psychology, pp. 189–206. Routledge, London (2018a)
Harré, R., Llored, J.-P.: Products, procedures and pictures. Philosophy 93, 167–186 (2018b)
Harré, R., Llored, J.-P.: The Analysis of Practices. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle upon Tyne (2019)
Lavoisier, A.-L.: Elements of Chemistry (R. Kerr, Trans.). Dover Publications, New York (1790)
Mi Gyung, K.: Affinity, that Elusive Dream. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2003)
Moyal-Sharrock, D.: Understanding Wittgenstein’s ‘On Certainty’. Palgrave-Macmillan, London (2004a)
Moyal-Sharrock, D. (ed.): The Third Wittgenstein. Routledge, London (2004b)
Moyal-Sharrock, D.: Wittgenstein on knowledge and certainty. In: Glock, H., Hyman, J. (eds.) A Companion to Wittgenstein, pp. 547–562. Wiley, Oxford (2017)
Murray, J.: A System of Chemistry: In Four Volumes, vol. 2, 4th edn. Francis Pillans, Edinburgh (1819a)
Murray, J.: Experiments on muriatic acid gas. Ann. Philos, 13, 26–39 and 285–298 (1819b)
Ruston, S.: Humphry Davy: analogy, priority, and the “true philosopher”. Ambix 66(2–3), 121–139 (2019)
Siegfried, R.: Humphry Davy and the elementary nature of chlorine. J. Chem. Educ. 36(11), 568–570 (1959)
Siegfried, R.: The discovery of potassium and sodium, and the problem of the chemical elements. Isis 54(2), 247–258 (1962)
Sober, E.: What is the problem of simplicity? In: Zellner, A., et al. (eds.) Simplicity, Inference and Modelling: Keeping It Sophisticatedly Simple, pp. 13–31. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)
Tate, G.: Humphry Davy and the problem of analogy. Ambix 66, 140–157 (2019)
Thomson, T.: Sketch of the Improvements in Science made during the year 1813. Ann. Philos. 3, 1–32 (1814)
Thomson, T.: Account of the Improvements in Physical Science during the year 1815. Ann. Philos. 7, 1–71 (1816)
Weeks, M.E.: Discovery of the Elements, 6th edn. Journal of Chemical Education, Easton (1956)
Wittgenstein, L.: On Certainty. Ed. Anscombe, G.E.M., von Wright, G.H. Trans. Paul, D., Anscombe, G.E.M. Basil Blackwell, Oxford (1969)
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to dedicate this paper to the memory of prof. Rom Harré. We would also like to thank Elena Ghibaudi and the organisers of the ISPC 2019 conference, as well as an anonymous reviewer. Funding was provided by Université Paris Diderot.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hijmans, S., Llored, JP. How to investigate the underpinnings of sciences? The case of the element chlorine. Found Chem 22, 447–456 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-020-09372-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-020-09372-6