Abstract
In “Agreeing to Disagree” [1], Robert Aumann proves that a group of agents who once agreed about the probability of some proposition for which their current probabilities are common knowledge must still agree, even if those probabilities reflect disparate observations. Perhaps one saw that a card was red and another saw that it was a heart, so that as far as that goes, their common prior probability of 1/52 for its being the Queen of hearts would change in the one case to 1/26, and in the other to 1/13. But if those are indeed their current probabilities, it cannot be the case that both know them, and both know that both know them, etc., etc.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
R.J. Aumann, “Agreeing to Disagree”, in: Annals of Statistics,4, 1976, pp.1236–1239.
R. Carnap, Logical Foundations of Probability. Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1950 (2nd ed. 1962 ).
J.D. Geanakoplos and H.M. Polemarchakis, “We Can’t Disagree Forever”, in: Journal of Economic Theory, 28, 1982, pp. 192–200.
M. Goldstein, “The Prevision of Prevision”, in: Journal of the American Statistical Association,78, 1983, pp.817–819.
J. Harsanyi, “Games of Incomplete Information Played by Bayesian Players”, Parts I-1H, in: Management Science, 14, 1967–1968, pp.159–182, 320–334, 486–502.
M. Hild, R. Jeffrey and M. Risse, “Aumann’s `No Agreement’ Theorem Generalized”, in: C. Bicchieri, R. Jeffrey, and B. Skyrms, (eds.), The Logic of Strategy. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1997.
D. Lewis, Convention, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press 1969.
O. Neurath, “Protokollsätze”, in: Erkenntnis,3, 1932, pp. 204–214. Translated in his Philosophical Papers 1913–1946,Dordrecht: Reidel 1983.
M. Osborne and A. Rubinstein, A Course in Game Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press 1994.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hild, M., Jeffrey, R., Risse, M. (1998). Agreeing to Disagree: Harsanyi and Aumann. In: Leinfellner, W., Köhler, E. (eds) Game Theory, Experience, Rationality. Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook [1997], vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1654-3_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1654-3_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4992-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1654-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive