Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Disadvantaged Consumers: An Ethical Approach to Consumption by the Poor

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This essay presents my research stream on impoverished citizens as it relates to transdisciplinary work at the intersection of consumer behavior, applied ethics, public policy, and marketing practice. The original studies that inform this discussion were conducted using ethnographic methods with subpopulations that included the homeless, rural poor, children living in poverty, and aborigines isolated in the Australian outback. The opening section frames my work within the context of the larger marketing domain. The next section describes dysfunctional business activities that reduce the consumer quality of life of disadvantaged citizens. Their reactions to this maltreatment then are presented, with an emphasis on the various groups noted. The essay closes with a brief discourse on restricted consumer behavior in business ethics research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alwitt L. F., Donley T. D. 1996 The Low Income Consumer: Adjusting the Balance of Exchange. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreasen A. R. 1975 The Disadvantaged Consumer. New York, The Free Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreasen, A. R.: 1993, ‹Revisiting the Disadvantaged: Old Lessons and New Problems’, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 12(2), 270–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi R. P. 1975 Marketing as Exchange. Journal of Marketing 89 (October):32–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belk R. W., Wallendorf M., Sherry J. F. 1989 The Sacred and the Profane in Consumer Behavior: Theodicy on the Odyssey. Journal of Consumer Research 16 (June):1–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell J., Burlin B. M. 1993 In Urban Areas: Many of the Poor Still Pay More for Food. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 12 (2):260–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplovitz D. 1963 The Poor Pay More. New York, The Free Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford G. T., Calfee J. E. 1986 Recent Developments in the FTC Policy on Deception. Journal of Marketing 50 (July):82–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill R. P. 2001a Surviving in a Material World: Evidence from Ethnographic Consumer Research on People in Poverty. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 30 (4):364–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R. P.: 2001b, Surviving in a Material World: The Lived Experience of People in Poverty (University of Notre Dame Press)

  • Hill R. P. 2002a Compassionate Love, Agape, and Altruism: A New Framework for Understanding and Supporting Impoverished Consumers. Journal of Macromarketing 22 (June):19–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill R. P. 2002b Stalking the Poverty Consumer: A Retrospective Examination of Modern Ethical Dilemmas. Journal of Business Ethics 37 (May):209–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill R. P.: 2003, ‹Homelessness in the United States: An Ethnographic Look at Consumption Strategies’, Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology 13 (September/October), 128–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill R. P. 2005 Do the Poor Deserve Less than Surfers? An Essay for the Special Issue on Vulnerable Consumers. Journal of Macromarketing 25 (December):215–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill R. P., J. Gaines: 2007, ‹The Consumer Culture of Poverty: Research Findings from the Consumer-Behavior Field’. Journal of American Culture 30(March), 81–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill R. P., D. L. Ramp and L. Silver: 1998, ‹The Rent-To-Own Industry and Pricing Disclosure Tactics’, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 17(1), 3–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Karpatkin, R. H.: 1999, ‹Toward a Fair and Just Marketplace for All Consumers: The Responsibilities of Marketing Professionals’, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 18(1), 118–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler P., Levy S. J. 1969 Broadening the Concept of Marketing. Journal of Marketing 83 (January):10–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laczniak G. R., Murphy P. E. 2006 Marketing, Consumers and Technology: Perspectives for Enhancing Ethical Transactions. Business Ethics Quarterly 16 (3):313–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. G., J. L. Ozanne and R. P. Hill: 1999, ‹Improving Service Encounters Through Resource Sensitivity: The Case of Health Care Delivery in an Appalachian Community’, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 18(2), 230–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls J. 1971 A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA, Belknap

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Parijs P. 2001 What’s Wrong with a Free Lunch? Boston, Beacon

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkie W. L., McNeill D. L., Mazis M. B. 1984 Marketing’s Scarlett Letter: The Theory and Practice of Corrective Advertising. Journal of Marketing 48 (Spring):11–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The author would like to thank the Special Editor and John Sherry for their suggestions and support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronald Paul Hill.

Additional information

Ronald Paul Hill is the Robert J. and Barbara Naclerio Endowed Chairholder and Senior Associate Dean of Intellectual Strategy in the Villanova School of Business.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hill, R.P. Disadvantaged Consumers: An Ethical Approach to Consumption by the Poor. J Bus Ethics 80, 77–83 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9443-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9443-z

Keywords

Navigation