Skip to main content
Log in

Patients' Voices, Rights and Responsibilities: On Implementing Social Audit in Primary Health Care

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reports on an interpretive research project which examines the feasibility of implementing social audit within the general medical practice setting. The study aims to communicate patients' voices to aid evaluation of the potential contribution of social audit to the public health sector and also addresses particular conceptual problems which arise when attempting to implement social audit within this environment. The fieldwork focuses on one general health practice in Lanarkshire (in southern central Scotland). Consultative focus group discussions and individual interviews were carried out with a sample of twenty two patients. Patients were most concerned with health service organisational and delivery issues. Overall, the results suggest patients are enthusiastic about the ideas and process of the social audit. Patients were able to demonstrate a capacity for grasping accountability issues and balanced reasoning. There was an acute awareness of the constraints which exist in the public services. Patients addressed the broad rights and responsibilities issues, and highlighted the possible pitfalls of relying on a representational mechanism for ensuring their voices were heard. The study concludes that an involved and negotiative dialogue process of implementing social audit could provide beneficial understanding and ideas to the organisation which may be further researched.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abel-Smith, B.: 1996, ‘Health Care Costs: An International Dilemma’, LSE Magazine 8(1) (Summer), 7–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastian, H.: 1996, ‘Raising the Standard: Practice Guidelines and Consumer Participation’, International Journal for Quality in Health Care 8(5), 485–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, P.: 1973, Accountability Standards in Financial Reporting (Haymarket Publishing, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowerman, M., H. Smith and C. Humphrey: 1997, ‘In Search of the Audit Society: Some Evidence from Health Care, Police and Schools’, paper presented at the Seventh National Auditing Conference, Cranfield School of Management.

  • Broadbent, J., R. Laughlin and S. Read: 1991, ‘Recent Financial and Administrative Changes in the NHS: A Critical Theory Analysis’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting 2(1), 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, J., R. Laughlin and H. Willig-Atherton: 1994, ‘Financial Controls and Schools: Accounting in “Public” and “Private” Spheres’, British Accounting Review 26(3), 255–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, J., M. Dietrich and R. Laughlin: 1996, ‘The Development of Principal-Agent, Contracting and Accountability Relationships in the Public Sector: Conceptual and Cultural Problems’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting 7(3), 259–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrol, L., F. Sullivan and M. Colledge: 1994, ‘Assessment of Primary Health Care Needs: Patients Perceptions in a Fundholding Practice’, working paper, Department of General Practice, University of Glasgow.

  • Chelimsky, E.: 1985, ‘Comparing and Contrasting Auditing and Evaluation: Some Notes on Their Relationship’, Evaluation Review 9(4), 483–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chelimsky, E.: 1997, ‘Thoughts for a New Evaluation Society’, Evaluation 3(1), 97–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotton, P., I. A. M. Fraser and W. Y. Hill: 1997a,’ The Social Audit Agenda - Primary Health Care in a Stakeholder Society’, paper presented at the 7th National Auditing Conference held at the Cranfield School of Management (21–22 March, 1997).

  • Cotton, P., I. A. M. Fraser and W. Y. Hill: 1997b,’ Researching the Patients' Charter’, Social and Environmental Accounting 17(2), 7–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dey, C., R. Evans and R. H. Gray: 1995, ‘Towards Social Information Systems and Bookkeeping: A Note on Developing the Mechanisms for Social Accounting and Audit’, Journal of Applied Accounting Research 2(3), 36–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnison, D.: 1994, Act Local - Social Justice from the Bottom Up (Institute for Public Policy Research, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyal, L.: 1992, ‘Need for Moral Audit in Evaluating Quality in Health Care’, Quality in Health Care 1, 178–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enderle, G.: 1997, ‘In Search of a Common Ethical Ground: Corporate Environmental Responsibility from the Perspective of Christian Environmental Stewardship’, Journal of Business Ethics 16, 173–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, V. A., T. A. Sheldon, A. J. Sowden and I. S. Watt: 1996, ‘Supporting Consumer Involvement in Decision Making: what Constitutes Quality in Consumer Health Information?’, International Journal for Quality in Health Care 8(5), 425–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyles, J.: 1991, ‘Privatising the Health and Welfare State. The Western European Experience’, in J. L. Scarpaci (ed.), Health Services Privatisation Industrial Societies (Jessica Kingsley, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetterman, D. M., S. J. Kaftarian and A. Wandersman (eds.): 1996, Empowerment Evaluation: Knowledge and Tools for Self-Assessment & Accountability (Sage, Thousand Oaks).

    Google Scholar 

  • Glynn, J. J., D. A. Perkins and S. Stewart (eds.): 1996, Achieving Value for Money. The Management of Health Care Series (WB Saunders, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R. H., D. L. Owen and K.T. Maunders: 1987, Corporate Social Reporting: Accounting and Accountability (Prentice Hall, Hemel Hempstead).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R., C. Dey, D. Owen, R. Evans and S. Zadek: 1997, ‘Struggling with the Praxis of Social Accounting: Stakeholders, Accountability, Audits and Procedures’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 10(3), 325–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R., D. Owen and C. Adams: 1996, Accounting & Accountability: Changes and Challenges in Corporate Social and Environmental Reporting (Prentice Hall, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hines, R. D.: 1988, ‘Financial Accounting In Communicating Reality, We Construct Reality’, Accounting, Organisations and Society 13(3), 251–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapsley, I.: 1996, ‘Can We Account for Healthcare?’, in M. Bourn and C. Sutcliffe (eds.), Management Accounting in Healthcare (The Chartered Institute of Management Accountants, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapsley, I., S. Llewellyn and J. Grant: 1997, GP Fundholders: Agents of Change (The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scorland, Edinburgh).

    Google Scholar 

  • Laughlin, R.: 1996, ‘Principals and Higher Principals: Accounting for Accountability in the Caring Professions’, in R. Munro and J. Mouristen (eds.), Accountability: Power, Ethos and the Technologies of Managing (International Thomson Business Press, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Laughlin, R., J. Broadbent and H. Willig-Atherton: 1994, ‘Recent Financial and Administrative Changes in GP Practices in the U.K.: Initial Experience and Effects’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 7(3), 96–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laughlin, R. and J. Broadbent: 1996, ‘Redesigning Fourth Generation Evaluation - An Evaluation Model for the Public-sector Reforms in the U.K.?’, Evaluation 2(4), 431–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Grand, J.: 1996, ‘New Visions of Welfare’, in H. Sasson and D. Diamond (eds.), LSE on Social Science (LSE Books, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Likierman, A.: 1989, ‘Ethical Dilemmas for Accountants: A United Kingdom Perspective’, Journal of Business Ethics 8, 617–629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Llewellyn, S.: 1994, ‘Managing the Boundary: How Accounting is Implicated in Maintaining the Organisation’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 7(1), 4–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Llewellyn, S. and J. Grant: 1996, ‘The Impact of Fundholding on Primary Health Care: Accounts from Scottish Gps’, Financial Accountability & Management 12(2), 125–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntosh, N. B. and R. W. Scapens: 1990, ‘Structurisation Theory in Management Accounting’, Accounting, Organisations and Society 15(5), 455–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M. R.: 1993, Socially Responsible Accounting (Chapman Hall, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard, A.: 1996, ‘Rationing Health Care’, British Medical Journal 313, 1499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medawar, C.: 1976, ‘The Social Audit: A Political View’, Accounting, Organisations and Society 1(4), 389–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, A., T. Puxty, P. Sikka and H. Willmott: 1994, ‘Ethical Statements as Smokescreens for Sectional Interests: The Case of the U.K. Accountancy Profession’, Journal of Business Ethics 13, 39–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris B. and L. Bell: 1996, ‘Quality and Value for Money’, in J. J. Glynn, D. A. Perkins and S. Stewart (eds.), Achieving Value for Money. The Management of Health Care Series (WB Saunders, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, F. and J. Mitchell: 1996, ‘Clinical Audit: Value for Money?’, in J. J. Glynn, D. A. Perkins and S. Stewart (eds.), Achieving Value for Money. The Management of Health Care Series (WB Saunders, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Munro, R. J. B. and D. J. Hatherly: 1993,’ Accountability and the New Commercial Agenda’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting 4(4), 369–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Riordan, T. and R. Ward: 1997, Building Trust in Shoreline Management, Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment, CSERGE Working Paper GEC 97–11. School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia.

  • Pearce, J., P. Raynard and S. Zadek: 1997, Social Auditing for Small Organisations (New Economics Foundation, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrin, J.: 1992, ‘The National Health Service’, in D. Henley, A. Likierman, J. Perrin, M. Evans, I. Lapsley and J. Whiteoak (eds.), Public Sector Accounting and Financial Control (Chapman & Hall, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, M.: 1994, The Audit Explosion (Demos, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, M.: 1996, ‘Making Things Auditable’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 21(4), 289–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puxty, A. G.: 1986, ‘Social Accounting as Immanent Legitimation: A Critique of a Technist Ideology’, Advances in Public Interest Accounting 1, 95–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puxty, A. G.: 1991, ‘Social Accountability and Universal Programatics’, Advances in Public Interest Accounting 4, 35–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raynard, P.: 1995, ‘The New Economics Foundation's Social Audit: Auditing the Auditors?’, Social and Environmental Accounting 15(1), 7–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J. and R. Scapens: 1985, ‘Accounting Systems and Systems of Accountability - Understanding Accounting Practices in their Organisational Contexts’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 10(4), 443–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S.: 1996, ‘Evaluating the Progress of Clinical Audit’, Evaluation 2(4), 373–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A., D. Preston, D. Buchanan and S. Jordan: 1997, ‘When Two Worlds Collide - Conducting a Management Evaluation in a Medical Environment’, Evaluation 3(1), 49–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tudor-Hart, J.: 1995, ‘Clinical and Economic Consequences of Patients as Producers’, Journal of Public Health Medicine 17(4), 383–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull, S.: 1995, ‘The Need For Stakeholder Councils In Social Audits’, Social and Environmental Accounting 15(2), 10–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watt, G. C. M.: 1996, ‘All Together Now: Why Social Deprivation Matters to Everyone’, British Medical Journal 312, 1026–1028.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willmott, H.: 1996, ‘Thinking Accountability: Accounting for the Disciplined Production of Self’, in R. Munro and J. Mouristen (eds.), Accountability: Power, Ethos and the Technologies of Managing (International Thomson Business Press, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadek, S.: 1993, ‘The Social Audit of Traidcraft plc’, Social and Environmental Accounting 13(2), 5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadek, S. and R. Evans: 1993, Auditing the Market (Traidcraft Exchange, Gatshead).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadek, S.: 1997, Balancing Performance, Ethics and Accountability.Paper presented at the First Euroconference on Balancing Performance, Ethics and Accountability. Nijenrode Castle, Netherlands, September.

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hill, W.Y., Fraser, I. & Cotton, P. Patients' Voices, Rights and Responsibilities: On Implementing Social Audit in Primary Health Care. Journal of Business Ethics 17, 1481–1497 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006064118810

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006064118810

Keywords

Navigation