Skip to main content
Log in

The Socially-Responsible University: Talking the Talk while Walking the Walk in the College of Business

  • Published:
Journal of Academic Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article presents a stakeholder-based example of corporate social responsibility (CSR) within a university context. The first section provides a literature review that builds the case for CSR efforts by educational institutions. The next section details aspects of the focal corporate social responsibility program at the University of South Florida St. Petersburg (USFSP) from its early conception to its implementation. The Talking the Talk section describes the overarching mission of the larger university and its influence on the mission of the newly formed College of Business which undertook an ambitious community outreach program in a downtown neighborhood. The execution of the program is discussed subsequently in the Walking the Walk section, with an emphasis on formation of advisory boards, development of appropriate coursework, relevant interactions with external constituencies, and plans for assessment and continuous improvement. The article closes with recommendations for universities considering similar endeavors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Angelidis, J.P. & Ibrahim, N.A. (2002). Practical implications of educational background on future corporate executives, Teaching Business Ethics 6, 117-126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A.B. (1983). Corporate social responsibility: Will industry respond to cutbacks in social program funding? Vital Speeches of the Day 49, 604-608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A.B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct, Business and Society 38, 268-295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, T. (1998). The Internet as a potential equalizer: New leverage for confronting social irresponsibility, Public Relations Review 24, 289-303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. (1960). Can business afford to ignore social responsibilities? California Management Review 2, 70-76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eilbert, H. & Parket, I.R. (1973). The current status of corporate social responsibility, Business Horizons 16, 5-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, E.M. (1987). The corporate social policy process: Beyond business ethics, corporate social responsibility, and corporate social responsiveness, California Management Review 29, 99-114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, E.M. (1999). The continuing quest for accountable, ethical, and humane corporate capitalism, Business and Society 38, 253-267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, W.C. (1994). From CSR1 to CSR2: The maturing of business and society thought, Business and Society 33, 150-164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, W.C. (1995). Values, Nature, and Culture in the American Corporation.New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederick,W.C. (1998). Creatures, corporations, communities, chaos, complexity, Business and Society, 37, 358-389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R.P. & Cassill, D.L. (2004). The naturological view of the corporation and its social responsibility: An extension of the Frederick model of corporation-community relationships, Business and Society Review 109, forthcoming.

  • Hill, R.P., Stephens, D.L. & Smith, I. (2003). Corporate social responsibility: An examination of individual firm behavior, Business and Society Review 108, 339-362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, H.L. (1971). Business in Contemporary Society: Framework and Issues.Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyner, B.E. & Payne, D. (2002). Evolution and implementation: A study of values, business ethics and corporate social responsibility, Journal of Business Ethics 41, 297-311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kok, P., van der Wiele, T., McKenna, R. & Brown, A. (2001). A corporate social responsibility audit within a quality management framework, Journal of Business Ethics 31, 285-297.

    Google Scholar 

  • L'Etang, J. (1995). Ethical corporate social responsibility: A framework for managers, Journal of Business Ethics 14, 125-132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logsdon, J.M. & Yuthas, K. (1997). Corporate social performance, stakeholder orientation, and organizational moral development, Journal of Business Ethics 16, 1213-1226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maignan, I. & Ralston, D. (2002). Corporate social responsibility in Europe and the US: Insights from businesses' self presentations, Journal of International Business Studies 33,497-514.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, J.W. (1963). Business and Society. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, A. (1994). The seven (almost) deadly sins of high-minded entrepreneurs, Inc 16, 47-48, 51.

    Google Scholar 

  • RMPK Group (2002). The Midtown Strategic Planning Initiative. St. Petersburg, FL: A.A. Baker and Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snider, J., Hill, R.P. & Martin, D. (2003). Corporate social responsibility in the 21st century: A view from the world's most successful firms, Journal of Business Ethics 48

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hill, R.P. The Socially-Responsible University: Talking the Talk while Walking the Walk in the College of Business. Journal of Academic Ethics 2, 89–100 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JAET.0000039009.48115.3d

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JAET.0000039009.48115.3d

Navigation