Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The varied sorrows of logical abstraction

  • Published:
Axiomathes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. M. Dummett,Frege: Philosophy of Mathematics, Cambridge MA, Harvard University Press.

  2. G. Frege, “Begriffsschrift, a formula language, modeled upon that of arithmetic for pure thought,” in [van Heijenoort 1967], 1–82.

  3. G. Frege,Foundations of Arithmetic, Oxford, Blackwell 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. Frege,Basic Laws of Arithmetic, Berkeley, University of California Press 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. Frege, “Review of E.G. Husserl’s Philosophy of Arithmetic,”Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic and Philosophy, Oxford, Blackwell 1984, 195–209.

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. Frege,Posthumous Writings, Oxford, Blackwell.

  7. G. Frege,Philosophical and Mathematical Correspondence, Oxford, Blackwell.

  8. G. Frege,Translations from the Philosophical Writings, ed. by P. Geach, and M. Black, Oxford, Blackwell.

  9. A. Garciadiego,Bertrand Russell and the Origins of the Settheoretic ‘Paradoxes,’ Basel, Birkhäuser.

  10. I. Grattan-Guinness, “Bertrand Russell on His Paradox and the Multiplicative Axiom: An Unpublished Letter to Philip Jourdain,”Journal of Philosophical Logic 1, 103–10.

  11. I. Grattan-Guinness, “Preliminary Notes on the Historical Significance of Quantification and the Axiom of Choice in Mathematical Analysis,”Historia Mathematica 2, 475–88.

  12. I. Grattan-Guinness,Dear Russell-Dear Jourdain, a commentary on Russell’s logic based on his correspondence with Philip Jourdain, London, Duckworth.

  13. C.O. Hill,Word and Object in Husserl, Frege and Russell, the roots of twentieth century philosophy, Athens, Ohio University Press.

  14. C.O. Hill, “Husserl and Frege on Substitutivity,” in L. Haaparanta, ed.,Mind, Meaning and Mathematics, Dordrecht, Kluwer, 113–40.

  15. C.O. Hill, “Frege’s Attack on Husserl and Cantor,”The Monist, 77, no. 3 (July), 346–57.

  16. C.O. Hill,Rethinking Identity and Metaphysics, New Haven, Yale University Press.

  17. J. Hintikka,Knowledge and Belief, Ithaca, Cornell University Press.

  18. J. Hintikka,Models for Modalities, Dordrecht, Reidel.

  19. J. Hintikka,The Intentions of Intentionality and Other New Models for Modalities, Dordrecht, Reidel.

  20. J. Hintikka and D. Davidson, eds.,Words and Objections, Essays on the Work of W. V. Quine, Boston, Reidel.

  21. E. Husserl,Philosophie der Arithmetik. Mit ergänzenden Texten (1890–1901), Dordrecht, Kluwer 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  22. E. Husserl,Formal and Transcendental Logic, The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  23. D. Kaplan and R. Montague, “A Paradox Regained,”Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 1, 3 (July), 79–90.

  24. C.W. Kilmister,Russell, London, The Harvester Press.

  25. R. B. Marcus, “Extensionality,”Mind 69, 55–62.

  26. R. B. Marcus,Modalities, New York, Oxford University Press.

  27. R. Montague, “Syntactical Treatments of Modality, with Corollaries on Reflexion Principles and Finite Axiomatizability,”Acta Philosophica Fennica, Proceedings of a Colloquium on Modal and Many-Valued Logics, 153–67.

  28. W.V.O. Quine,Mathematical Logic, New York, Norton.

  29. W.V.O. Quine, “The Problem of Interpreting Modal Logic,”Journal of Symbolic Logic 12, no. 2 (June), 43–48.

  30. W.V.O. Quine,Methods of Logic, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  31. W.V.O. Quine,Word and Object, Cambridge MA, M.I.T. Press.

  32. W.V.O. Quine, “New Foundations For Mathematical Logic,”From a Logical Point of View, New York, Harper’s Row 1953, 80–101.

    Google Scholar 

  33. W.V.O. Quine, “Logic and the Reification of Universals,”From a Logical Point of View, New York, Harper’s Row 1953, 102–29.

    Google Scholar 

  34. W.V.O. Quine,Set Theory and Its Logic, Cambridge MA, Harvard University Press.

  35. W.V.O. Quine,Ways of Paradox, Cambridge MA, Harvard University Press.

  36. W.V.O. Quine, “Promoting Extensionality,”Synthese 98, 143–51.

  37. F. Rodriguez-Consuerga,The Mathematical Philosophy of Bertrand Russell: Origins and Development, Basel, Birkhäuser.

  38. B. Russell,Principles of Mathematics, London, Norton.

  39. B. Russell,Mysticism and Logic, London, Allen & Unwin 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  40. B. Russell,Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy, London, Allen & Unwin.

  41. B. Russell,Principia Mathematica to *56, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2nd ed. 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  42. B. Russell, “My Mental Development,” in P. Schilpp, ed.,The Philosophy of Bertrand Russell, Evanston, Northwestern University Press, 3–20.

  43. B. Russell,Logic and Knowledge, London, Allen & Unwin.

  44. B. Russell,My Philosophical Development, London, Allen & Unwin.

  45. B. Russell,Essays on Analysis, D. Lackey, ed., London, Allen & Unwin.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 39, rue Gay Lussac, 75005, Paris, France

    Claire Ortiz Hill

Authors
  1. Claire Ortiz Hill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

This paper is drawn from sections of my bookRethinking Identity and Metaphysics, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1997.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hill, C.O. The varied sorrows of logical abstraction. Axiomathes 8, 53–82 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02681881

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02681881

Keywords

Search

Navigation