Europe PMC

This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing to this as outlined in our privacy notice and cookie policy.

Disclosure preferences regarding cancer diagnosis and prognosis: to tell or not to tell?

Author information

Affiliations

  • 1. Department of Social Gerontology, University of Tokyo, Japan.
      Authors
    • Miyata H 1
    (1 author)

ORCIDs linked to this article

Journal of Medical Ethics, 01 Aug 2005, 31(8):447-451
https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2003.007302 PMID: 16076967 PMCID: PMC1734201

Free full text in Europe PMC

Abstract 

Telling people that they have cancer has a great impact on their lives, so many doctors are concerned about how they should inform patients about a cancer diagnosis and its prognosis. We conducted a general population survey in Japan to investigate people's preferences on receiving this information. There were no significant differences in respondents' preferences according to the seriousness of the cancer. Full disclosure of the diagnosis was preferred by 86.1% of the respondents, while 2.7% wanted non-disclosure. As for the initial provision of information, the majority preferred partial disclosure concerning the prospects of complete recovery (64.5%) and the expected length of survival (64.1%). Those who responded negatively to the statement, "If I am close to the end of my life, I want to be informed of the fact so I can choose my own way of life", were more likely to want non-disclosure on diagnosis. The results suggest that, at the first opportunity of providing information, a disclosure policy of giving patients full details of their diagnosis and some information on prognosis can satisfy the preferences of most patients. Contrary to popular belief, the seriousness of the cancer and people's demographic characteristics displayed little impact in this study.

Free full text 

Logo of jmedethLink to Publisher's site
J Med Ethics. 2005 Aug; 31(8): 447–451.
PMCID: PMC1734201
PMID: 16076967

Disclosure preferences regarding cancer diagnosis and prognosis: to tell or not to tell?

H Miyata, M Takahashi, T Saito, H Tachimori, and I Kai
Author information Copyright and License information Disclaimer

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (75K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Holland JC, Geary N, Marchini A, Tross S. An international survey of physician attitudes and practice in regard to revealing the diagnosis of cancer. Cancer Invest. 1987;5(2):151–154. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Surbone A. Truth telling to the patient. JAMA. 1992 Oct 7;268(13):1661–1662. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Thomsen OO, Wulff HR, Martin A, Singer PA. What do gastroenterologists in Europe tell cancer patients? Lancet. 1993 Feb 20;341(8843):473–476. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Pronzato P, Bertelli G, Losardo P, Landucci M. What do advanced cancer patients know of their disease? A report from Italy. Support Care Cancer. 1994 Jul;2(4):242–244. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Harrison A, al-Saadi AM, al-Kaabi AS, al-Kaabi MR, al-Bedwawi SS, al-Kaabi SO, al-Neaimi SB. Should doctors inform terminally ill patients? The opinions of nationals and doctors in the United Arab Emirates. J Med Ethics. 1997 Apr;23(2):101–107. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Kaplowitz Stan A, Campo Shelly, Chiu Wai Tat. Cancer patients' desires for communication of prognosis information. Health Commun. 2002;14(2):221–241. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Horikawa N, Yamazaki T, Sagawa M, Nagata T. Changes in disclosure of information to cancer patients in a general hospital in Japan. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2000 Jan-Feb;22(1):37–42. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Elwyn Todd S, Fetters Michael D, Sasaki Hiroki, Tsuda Tsukasa. Responsibility and cancer disclosure in Japan. Soc Sci Med. 2002 Jan;54(2):281–293. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Kawakami S, Arai G, Ueda K, Murai Y, Yokomichi H, Aoshima M, Takagi K. Physician's attitudes towards disclosure of cancer diagnosis to elderly patients: a report from Tokyo, Japan. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2001 Aug;33(1):29–36. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Tattersall Martin H N, Gattellari Melina, Voigt Katie, Butow Phyllis N. When the treatment goal is not cure: are patients informed adequately? Support Care Cancer. 2002 May;10(4):314–321. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Horikawa N, Yamazaki T, Sagawa M, Nagata T. The disclosure of information to cancer patients and its relationship to their mental state in a consultation-liaison psychiatry setting in Japan. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1999 Sep-Oct;21(5):368–373. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Hosaka T, Awazu H, Fukunishi I, Okuyama T, Wogan J. Disclosure of true diagnosis in Japanese cancer patients. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1999 May-Jun;21(3):209–213. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Centeno-Cortés C, Núez-Olarte JM. Questioning diagnosis disclosure in terminal cancer patients: a prospective study evaluating patients' responses. Palliat Med. 1994;8(1):39–44. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Kai I, Ohi G, Yano E, Kobayashi Y, Miyama T, Niino N, Naka K. Communication between patients and physicians about terminal care: a survey in Japan. Soc Sci Med. 1993 May;36(9):1151–1159. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Marwit Samuel J, Datson Susan L. Disclosure preferences about terminal illness: an examination of decision-related factors. Death Stud. 2002 Jan;26(1):1–20. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Akabayashi A, Fetters MD, Elwyn TS. Family consent, communication, and advance directives for cancer disclosure: a Japanese case and discussion. J Med Ethics. 1999 Aug;25(4):296–301. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Jenkins V, Fallowfield L, Saul J. Information needs of patients with cancer: results from a large study in UK cancer centres. Br J Cancer. 2001 Jan 5;84(1):48–51. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
Articles from Journal of Medical Ethics are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

Full text links 

Read article at publisher's site: https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2003.007302

Read article for free, from open access legal sources, via Unpaywall: https://jme.bmj.com/content/31/8/447.full.pdfUnpaywall

Citations & impact 

Impact metrics

38
Citations
Jump to Citations

Citations of article over time

Alternative metrics

Altmetric item for https://www.altmetric.com/details/1428632
Altmetric
Discover the attention surrounding your research
https://www.altmetric.com/details/1428632

Smart citations by scite.ai
Smart citations by scite.ai include citation statements extracted from the full text of the citing article. The number of the statements may be higher than the number of citations provided by EuropePMC if one paper cites another multiple times or lower if scite has not yet processed some of the citing articles.
Explore citation contexts and check if this article has been supported or disputed.
https://scite.ai/reports/10.1136/jme.2003.007302

Supporting
Mentioning
Contrasting
6
59
1

Article citations

Go to all (38) article citations

Similar Articles 

To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.