Abstract
In the Infini-Rien fragment of his Pensées, Blaise Pascal develops an argument for the rationality of faith in God, which posthumously became known as Pascal’s Wager and at the same time represents a cornerstone of modern probability theory. While this betting argument has been the subject of much philosophical investigation, the contribution of this paper lies in the following: On the one hand, the bet is reconstructed in its basic features as well as its structure with the help of modern decision and probability theory tools. Thus, it is shown that Pascal’s betting argument, in distinction to Hacking 1972 for instance, has the form of an a fortiori argument. On the other hand, as far as objections to Pascal’s argument are concerned, it is true that the premises have often been called into doubt, more or less convincingly. On the other hand, this article is dedicated to the question, often emphatically – especially in Hacking 1972 – and perhaps carelessly affirmed in Pascal research, whether Pascal’s premises imply his conclusion at all.
Bartha, R. 2007. „Taking Stock of Infinite Value: Pascal’s Wager and Relative Utilities“. Synthese 154, 5–52.10.1007/s11229-005-8006-zSearch in Google Scholar
Byl, J. 1994. „On Pascal’s Wager and Infinite Utilities“. Faith and Philosophy 11, 467–73.10.5840/faithphil199411354Search in Google Scholar
Dummett, M. 1978. „Wang’s Paradox“. In Truth and Other Enigmas. Harvard, 248–68.10.7551/mitpress/7064.003.0010Search in Google Scholar
Easwaran, K./Monton, B. 2012. „Mixed Strategies, Uncountable Times, and Pascal’s Wager: a Reply to Robertson“. Analysis 72, 681–85.10.1093/analys/ans122Search in Google Scholar
Goldmann, L. 1985. Der verborgene Gott: Studie über die tragische Weltanschauung in den Pensées Pascals und im Theater Racines (dt. Übers. von Le dieu caché: Etude sur la vision tragique dans les Pensées de Pascal et dans le théâtre de Racine, Paris 1955), Frankfurt/M.Search in Google Scholar
Hacking, I. 1972. „The Logic of Pascal’s Wager“. American Philosophical Quarterly 9, 186–92.10.1515/9781474465908-003Search in Google Scholar
Hájek, A. 2017. Pascal’s Wager. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Hrsg. von E. N. Zalta. Verfügbar unter: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pascal-wager/(22-20-2020).Search in Google Scholar
–. 2003. „Waging War on Pascal’s Wager“. Philosophical Review 112, 27–56.10.1215/00318108-112-1-27Search in Google Scholar
Herzberg, F. 2011. „Hyperreal Expected Utilities and Pascal’s Wager“. Logique et Analyse 54, 69–108.Search in Google Scholar
Jeffrey, R. C. 21983. The Logic of Decision. Chicago/London.Search in Google Scholar
Jordan, J. (Hrsg.) 1994. Gambling on God: Essays on Pascal’s Wager. Lanham (Maryland)/London, 83–99.Search in Google Scholar
Löffler, W. 1996. Einige Bemerkungen zur neueren Diskussion um ‚Pascals Wette‘. In Philosophie in Österreich 1996. Vorträge des IV. Kongresses der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Philosophie, Graz, 28. Feb. – 2. März 1996. Wien, 389–404.Search in Google Scholar
Mackie, J. L. 1982. The Miracle of Theism: Arguments for and against the Existence of God. Oxford.10.1515/9781400848393-041Search in Google Scholar
Martin, M. 1983. „Pascal’s Wager as an Argument for Not Believing in God“. Religious Studies 19, 57–64.10.1017/S0034412500014700Search in Google Scholar
Monton, B. 2011. „Mixed Strategies Can’t Evade Pascal’s Wager“. Analysis 71, 642–45.10.1093/analys/anr092Search in Google Scholar
McClennen, E. F. 1994. „Pascal’s Wager and Finite Decision Theory“. In Jordan 1994, 115–37.Search in Google Scholar
Pascal, B. 1937. Pensées. Dtsch. übers. u. hrsg. von E. Wasmuth: Über die Religion. Und über einige andere Gegenstände. Berlin.Search in Google Scholar
Pascal, B. 1999. Pensées. Hrsg. von P. Sellier. Paris.Search in Google Scholar
Rescher, N. 1985. Pascal’s Wager: A Study of Practical Reasoning in Philosophical Theology. Notre Dame, IN.Search in Google Scholar
Robertson, S. 2012. „Some Mixed Strategies can Evade Pascal’s Wager: a Reply to Monton“. Analysis 72, 295–98.10.1093/analys/ans039Search in Google Scholar
Robinson, A. 1966. Non-Standard Analysis. Amsterdam.Search in Google Scholar
Schäfer, L. 21985. Blaise Pascal (1623–1662). In Klassiker der Philosophie, Bd. I. Hrsg. von O. Höffe. München, 322–37.Search in Google Scholar
Schlesinger, G. 1994. A Central Theistic Argument. In Jordan 1994, 83–99.10.1515/9781474465908-004Search in Google Scholar
Sobel, J. H. 1996. Pascalian Wagers. Synthese 108, 11–61.10.1017/CBO9780511497988.014Search in Google Scholar
Sorensen, R. 1994. Infinite Decision Theory. In Jordan 1994, 139–59.Search in Google Scholar
Weidemann, H. 1999. „Wetten, daß …? Ein antikes Gegenstück zum Wettargument Pascals. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie“ 81, 290–315.10.1515/agph.1999.81.3.290Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
