Abstract
While the formal treatment of arguments in the late medieval modi arguendi owes much to dialectic, this does not remove the substance and function of the argumentative modes discussed from the realm of rhetoric. These works, designed to teach law students skills in legal argumentation, remain importantly focused on persuasive features of argumentation which have traditionally been strongly associated with a rhetorical approach, particularly in efforts to differentiate from it dialectic as a more strictly scientific and logical form of reasoning. This also sheds some light on the relative roles logic and rhetoric play in the legal discourse of our own time. In their approach to persuasive legal discourse, the modi arguendi stand between the argumentative rhetorics of Antiquity and the rhetoricized dialectics of the Renaissance, and by linking the minute technicalities of professionalized law with broad general considerations of justice, utility, nature, and emotion, they mediate between the modem trend towards atomized field-specific rhetorics and the classical idea of a unified civic rhetoric.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Abailard, P.: 1977, Sic et Non. B. Boyer and R. McKeon (eds.), University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Alexy, R.: 1978, Theorie der juristischen Argumentation. Die Theorie des rationalen Diskurses als Theorie der juristischen Begründung, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.M.
Berman, H. J.: 1983, Law and Revolution. The Formation of the Western Legal Tradition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Bird, O.: 1961, 'The Re-discovery of the Topics. Professor Toulmin's Inference-warrants', Mind 70, 534-539.
Bund, E.: 1983, Juristische Logik und Argumentation, Rombach, Freiburg i. Br.
Camargo, M.: 1991, Arts dictaminis, Ars dictandi, Brepols, Turnhout, Belgium, Typologie des sources du Moyen Age occidental 60.
Caprioli, S.: (ed.) 1963, 'De “Modis arguendi” scripta rariora' (#1-4), Studi Senesi 75, 30-56, 107-190, 230-253.
(40-54): Dinus de Mugello (died after 1298), Dini opusculum [De modo arguendi].
(111-185): Rainerius de Forlivio (died 1358), Raineri Summa super modo arguendi.
(231-233): Opusculum De variis modos arguendi tam iuris canonici quam ciuilis secundum Iohannem Andree et Iacobum de Arenis(After Johannes Andreae, died 1348, and Jacobus de Arenis died ca 1296).
(235-249): Lecturae cuiusdam reliquiae Londinensis [De modis argumentandi](Probably second half of 14th century; school of Cinus de Pistoia, died 1336).
Caprioli, S.: (ed.) 1965, 'De “Modis arguendi” scripta rariora' (#5), Studi Senesi 77, 355-414.
(358-407): Johannes Baptista de Caccialupis (died 1496), Iohannis Baptistae de Caccialupis opusculum [De argumentandi doctrina].
Conley, T. M.: 1994, Rhetoric in the European Tradition, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Chevrier, G.: 1966, 'Sur l'art de l'argumentation chez quelques Romanistes médiévaux au XIIe et au XIIIe siecle', Archives de philosophie du droit 11, 115-148.
Coing, H.: 1973, 'Die juristische Fakultät und ihr Lehrprogramm', in H. Coing (ed.), Handbuch der Quellen und Literatur der neueren europäischen Privatrechtsgeschichte: Mittelalter (1100-1500) 1, 39-128, Beck, München.
Fitting, H.: 1888, Die Anfänge der Rechtsschule zu Bologna, J. Guttentag, Berlin.
Fransen, G.: 1985, 'Les questions disputées dans les facultés de droit', in Les questions disputées et les questions quodlibétiques dans les facultés de théologie, de droit et de médecine, Brepols, Turnhout, pp. 223-277, Typologie des Sources du Moyen Age Occidental 44-45.
Garin, E.: 1969, 'Dialettica e retorica dal XII al XVI secolo', in L'età nuova. Ricerche di storia della cultura dal XII al XVI secolo, Morano, Napoli, pp. 43-79.
Gast W.: 1992, Juristische Rhetorik(2nd ed.), Decker, Heidelberg, R. v. Decker's rechts und sozialwissenschaftliche Abhandlungen 36.
Genzmer, E.: 1934, 'Die iustinianische Kodifikation und die Glossatoren', in Atti del Congresso internazionale di diritto Romano (Bologna 1933) 1, 345-430, Successori Fratelli Fusi, Pavia.
Giuliani, A.: 1964, 'L'elemento “giuridico” nella logica medioevale', JUS 15, 163-190.
Giuliani, A.: 1968, 'La logique de la controverse et le droit chez les Romanistes du XIIème et du XIIIème siècle', Studia et Documenta Historiae et luris 34, 223-248.
Green-Pedersen, N. J.: 1984, The Tradition of the Topics in the Middle Ages. The Commentaries on Aristotle's and Boethius' 'Topics'Philosophia Verlag, München, Analytica. Investigations in Logic, Ontology and the Philosophy of Language.
Grimaldi, W. M. A.: 1974, 'The Aristotelian Topics', in K. V. Erickson (ed.), Aristotle. The Classical Heritage of Rhetoric, Scarecrow Press, Metuchen, N.J., pp. 176-193.
Grimaldi, W. M. A.: 1988, Aristotle, Rhetoric II. A Commentary, Fordham University Press, New York.
Hamblin, C. L.: 1970, Fallacies, Methuen, London, University Paperbacks 439.
Horn, N.: 1978, 'Argumentum ab Auctoritate in der legistischen Argumentationistheorie', in O. Behrends, M. Dießelhorst et al. (eds.), Festschrift für Franz Wieacker zu seinem 70. Geburtstag, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen, pp. 261-272.
Kantorowicz, H.: 1939, 'The quaestiones disputatae of the glossators', Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis 16, 1-67.
Kuttner, S.: 1982, 'The Revival of Jurisprudence', in R. L. Benson, G. Constable and C. D. Lanham (eds.), Renaissance and Renewal in the Twelfth Century, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 299-323.
Lang, A.: 1940, 'Rhetorische Einflüsse auf die Behandlung des Prozesses in der Kanonistik des 12. Jahrhunderts', in Festschrift für Eduard Eichmann zum 70. Geburtstag, Schöningh, Paderborn, pp. 69-97.
Leff, M. C.: 1978, 'Boethius' De differentiis topicis, Book IV', in J. J. Murphy (ed.), Medieval Eloquence. Studies in the Theory and Practice of Medieval Rhetoric, University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 3-24.
Leff, M. C.: 1982, 'The Material of the Art in the Latin Handbooks of the Fourth Century A.D.', in B. Vickers (ed.), Rhetoric Revalued, Papers from the Intentional Society for the History of Rhetoric, Center for Medieval & Early Renaissance Studies, Binghamton, N.Y., pp. 71-78. Medieval and Renaissance Studies 19.
Leff, M. C.: 1983, 'The Topics of Argumentative Invention in Latin Rhetorical Theory from Cicero to Boethius', Rhetorica 1, 23-44.
Leff, M. C.: 1987, 'Modern Sophistic and the Unity of Rhetoric', in J. S. Nelson, A. Megill and D. N. McCloskey (eds.), The Rhetoric of the Human Sciences. Language and Argument in Scholarship and Public Affairs, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, pp. 19-37.
Maclean, I.: 1992, Interpretation and Meaning in the Renaissance. The Case of Law, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
McKeon, R.: 1987 [1942], 'Rhetoric in the Middle Ages', in M. Backman (ed.), Rhetoric, Essays in Invention and Discovery by Richard McKeon, Ox Bow Press, Woodbridge, Connecticut, pp. 121-166.
Murphy, J. J.: 1974, Rhetoric in the Middle Ages. A History of Rhetorical Theory from Saint Augustine to the Middle Ages, University of California Press, Berkeley.
Murphy, J. J. and M. Camargo: 1990, 'The Middle Ages', in W. B. Horner (ed.), The Present State of Scholarship in Historical and Contemporary Rhetoric(2nd ed.), University of Missouri Press, Columbia, Missouri, pp. 45-83.
Otte, G.: 1971, Dialektik und Jurisprudenz. Untersuchungen zur Methode der Glossatoren, Vittorio Klostermann, Frankfurt am Main.
Otte, G.: 1981, 'Die Rechtswissenschaft', in P. Weimar (ed.), Die Renaissance der Wissenschaften im 12. Jabrhundert, Artemis, Zürich, pp. 123-142.
Perelman, C.: 1979, Juristische Logik als Argumentationslehre, Alber, Freiburg, München, Kolleg Rechtstheorie II/2.
Pernot, L.: 1986, 'Lieu et lieu commun dans la rhétorique antique', Bulletin de l'Association Guillaume Budé, 253-284.
Radding, C. M.: 1988, The Origins of Medieval Jurisprudence, Pavia and Bologna 850-1150, Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.
Rashdall, H.: 1936, The Universities in the Middle Ages. Vol. I: Salerno-Bologna-Paris(new ed.) Vol. 1, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Rehbock, K.: 1988, Topik und Recht, eine Standortanalyse unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der aristotelischen Topik, VVF, München, Rechtswissenschaftliche Forschung und Entwicklung 182.
Salgado, J.: 1951, 'La méthode d'interprétation du droit en usage chez les canonistes (I)', Revue de l'Université d'Ottawa 22, 201-213.
Salgado, J.: 1952, 'La méthode d'interprétation du droit en usage chez les canonistes (II)', Revue de l'Université d'Ottawa 23, 23-35.
Schneider, E.: 1991, Logik für Juristen. Die Grundlagen der Denklehre und der Rechtsanwendung(3rd ed.), Vahlen, München.
Schreiber, R.: 1962, Logik des Rechts, Springer, Berlin.
Sobota, K.: 1990, Sachlichkeit, Rhetorische Kunst der Juristen, Peter Lang, Frankfurt a.M., Europäische Hochschulschriften, Reihe II, Rechtswissenschaft 930.
Soeteman, A.: 1989, Logic in Law, Kluwer, Dordrecht, Law and Philosophy Library.
Struck, G.: 1971, Topische Jurisprudenz, Athenäum, Frankfurt a.M., Studien und Texte zur Theorie und Methodologie des Rechts 9.
Stump, E. (tr and ed.): 1978, Boethius's De topicis differentiis, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y.
Stump, E. (tr. and ed.): 1988, Boethius's In Ciceronis Topica, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y.
Stump, E.: 1989, Dialectic and its Place in the Development of Medieval Logic, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y.
Thionville, E.: 1983, De la théorie des lieux communs dans les Topiques d'Aristote et des principales modifications qu'elle a subies jusqu'à nos jours(repr. of 1855 ed.), J. Vrin, Paris.
Toulmin, S. E.: 1958, The Uses of Argument, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Troje, H. E.: 1977, 'Die Literatur des gemeinen Rechts unter dem Einfluß des Humanismus', in H. Coing (ed.), Handbuch der Quellen und Literatur der neueren europäischen Privatrechtsgeschichte 2, Beck, München, pp. 615-795.
Vasoli, C.: 1968, La dialettica e la retorica dell'Umanesimo, Feltrinelli, Milano.
Viehweg, T.: 1974, Topik und Jurisprudenz. Ein Beitrag zur rechtswissenschaftlichen Grundlagenforschung(5th ed.), Beck, München, Beck'sche Schwarze Reihe 110.
Ward, J. O.: 1972, Artificiosa Eloquentia in the Middle Ages. The Study of Cicero's De inventione, the Ad Herennium and Quintilian's De institutione oratoria from the Early Middle Ages to the Thirteenth Century, with Special Reference to the Schools of Northern France. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto, Toronto.
Ward, J. O.: 1978, 'From Antiquity to the Renaissance: Glosses and Commentaries on Cicero's Rhetorica', in J. J. Murphy (ed.), Medieval Eloquence. Studies in the Theory and Practice of Medieval Rhetoric, University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 25-67.
Weimar, P.: 1967, 'Argumenta brocardica', in G. Forchielli and A. M. Stickler (eds.), Collectanea Stephan Kuttner 4, 89-123, Institutum Gratianum, Bologna, Studia Gratiana 14.
Weimar, P.: 1973, 'Die legistische Literatur der Glossatorenzeit', in H. Coing (ed.), Handbuch der Quellen und Literatuur der neueren europäischen Privatrechtsgeschichte 1, 129-260, Beck, Müchen.
Wetlaufer, G. B.: 1990, 'Rhetoric and its Denial in Legal Discourse', Virginia Law Review 76, 1545-1597.
Wouw, H. v.d.: 1991, 'Brocardica Dunelmensia', Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte, Romanistische Abteilung 108, 234-278.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hohmann, H. Logic and Rhetoric in Legal Argumentation: Some Medieval Perspectives. Argumentation 12, 39–55 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007726725140
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007726725140