Skip to main content
Log in

Laissez Faire Sex Selection—A Response to Edgar Dahl

  • Published:
Health Care Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This response to Edgar Dahl’s paper in this issue of Health Care Analysis clarifies my argument concerning sex selection and shows that our disagreement is less than he believes it is.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Dahl, E. (2005) Sex Selection: Laissez Faire or Family Balancing? Health Care Analysis 13, 87–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holm, S. (2004) Like a Frog in Boiling Water: the Public, the HFEA and Sex Selection. Health Care Analysis 12, 27–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (2002) Sex Selection: Choice and Responsibility in Human Reproduction. London: HFEA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Søren Holm.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Holm, S. Laissez Faire Sex Selection—A Response to Edgar Dahl. Health Care Anal 13, 91–93 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-005-2573-5

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-005-2573-5

Keywords

Navigation