Abstract
In this paper we analyse the degree to which a distinction between social science and public health research and other non-research activities can account for differences between a number of large scale social surveys performed at the national and European level. The differences we will focus on are differences in how participation is elicited and how data are used for government, research and other purposes. We will argue that the research / non-research distinction does not account for the identified differences in recruitment or use and that there are no other convincing justifications. We argue that this entails that eliciting participation by coercion or manipulation becomes very difficult to justify.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ACORN Classification. http://www.caci.co.uk/acorn/.
Blackburn, R. M., A. Dale, and J. Jarman. “Ethnic Differences in Attainment in Education, Occupation and Lifestyle.” In Ethnicity in the 1991 Census, Vol. 4. Editied by V. Karn. 242-264. London: HMSO, 1997.
Boyle, P., and D. Dorling. Guest Editorial: the 2001 UK census: remarkable resource or bygone legacy of the ‹pencil and paper era’? Area 36, no. 2 (2004): 101–110.
British Sociological Association. Statement of ethical practice for the British Sociological Association. http://www.britsoc.co.uk/equality/63.htm.
Census in Lithuania. http://www.stat.gov.lt/en/pages/view/?id=1352.
Census UK. http://www.statistics.gov.uk/census2001/cb_1.asp.
Duffy, B. and R. Williams. Employing Local Residents as Interviewers. London: MORI, 2003.
Egerton, M. Monitoring contemporary student flows and characteristics: secondary analyses using the Labour Force Survey and the General Household Survey. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A 163 no. 1 (2000): 63–80.
EUROBAROMETER. http://europa.eu.int/comm/public_opinion/index_en.htm.
General Household Survey http://www.statistics.gov.uk/ssd/surveys/general_household_survey.asp.
GHS Interviewer Instructions 2003/2004. (Internal unpublished document obtained from the Office of National Statistics).
Hakim, C. Social Change in the Labour Market: Evidence from the Census SARs on Occupational Segregation and Labour Mobility, Part-time work and Students’ Jobs, Homework and Self-Employment. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
Hansard. House of Commons. 9 Mar 2005. 1804W-1806W.
Li, Y. Samples of Anonymized Records (SARs) from the UK Census: A Unique Source for Social Science Research. Sociology 38, no 3, (2004): 553–572.
McCaa, R., and S. Ruggles. The Census in global perspective and the coming microdata revolution. Scandinavian Population Studies 13 (2002): 7–30.
Micro-Census in Germany. http://www.destatis.de/micro/e/micro_c1.htm.
MORI. http://www.mori.com/.
Murphy, M., K. Glaser, and E. Grundy. Marital Status and Long-Term Illness in Great Britain. Journal of Marriage and the Family 59 (1997): 156–164.
Owen, C. P., P. Mortimore, and A. Phoenix. “Higher Education Qualifications.” In Ethnicity in the 1991 Census, Vol. 4. Edited by V. Karn. 1-16. London: HMSO, 1997.
Popham, F. Is there a ‹Scottish effect’ for self reports of health? Individual level analysis of the 2001 UK census. BMC Public Health 6 (2006):191.
Social Research Association. Ethical Guidelines (2003)
http://www.the-sra.org.uk/ethical.htm.
UpMyStreet. http://www.upmystreet.com/.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Holm, S., Bortolotti, L. Large Scale Surveys for Policy Formation and Research–a Study in Inconsistency. Theor Med Bioeth 28, 205–220 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-007-9033-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-007-9033-1