Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mentoring and ethical beliefs in graduate education in science

Commentary on ‘influences on the ethical beliefs of graduate students concerning research’ (Sprague, Daw and Roberts)

  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sprague, R L., Daw, J, & Roberts, G C. (2001) Various Influences On and Comments about Ethical Beliefs Concerning Research of Faculty and Graduate Students, Science and Engineering Ethics 7: 507–520.

    Google Scholar 

  2. National Science Board (2000) Science and Engineering Indicators 2000, Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hill, S.T. (1999) Science and Engineering Doctorate Awards: 1998, Detailed Statistical Tables. Division of Science Resources Studies, National Science Foundation, Arlington Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  4. LaPidus, J.B. (1997) Doctoral education: preparing for the future. CGS Communicator XXX: 10, Special Edition, November, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Buchanan, A. (1996) Perfecting imperfect duties: Collective action to create moral obligations. Business Ethics Quarterly 6, 1: 27–42.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Weil, V. (2001) Mentoring: Some Ethical Consideration, Science and Engineering Ethics 7: 471–482.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Macrina, F.L. (1995) Chapter 2: Mentoring. Scientific Integrity: An Introductory Text with Cases. ASM Press, Washington, DC, pp. 15–39.

    Google Scholar 

  8. National Academy of Science, National Academy of Engineering, National Academy of Medicine. Committee of Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (1997) Advisor, Teacher, Role Model, Friend: On Being A Mentor to Students in Science and Engineering. National Academy Press, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  9. NC State University Resource Guide in Research Ethics, http://www.fis.nesu.edu/grad/ethics/resource.htm

  10. Zigmond, M.J. (1999) Promoting responsible conduct: Striving for change rather than consensus. Science and Engineering Ethics 5: 219–228.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fischer, B.A. & Zigmond, M.J. (2001) Promoting Responsible Conduct in Research through “Survival Skills” Workshops: Some Mentoring Is Best Done in a Crowd. Science and Engineering Ethics 7: 563–587.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Council of Graduate Schools (1990) Research Student and Supervisor: An Approach to Good Supervisory Practice, Council of Graduate Schools, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hollander, R.D. (1999) Guaranteeing good scientific practice in the U.S., in: Ethos of Research, edited by Prof. Dr. Rudiger Wolfrum, Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, Germany. Prior version presented at Ringberg Symposium, Tegernsee, Germany, Oct. 22, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 616 East 34th Street, 21218, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

    Rachelle D. Hollander Ph.D.

Authors
  1. Rachelle D. Hollander Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rachelle D. Hollander Ph.D..

Additional information

In the interest of full disclosure, I note that the U.S. National Science Foundation program I manage helped to support the research of Sprague, Daw and Roberts. This article contains the author’s opinions alone, not those of the NSF.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hollander, R.D. Mentoring and ethical beliefs in graduate education in science. SCI ENG ETHICS 7, 521–524 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-001-0009-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-001-0009-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation