Skip to main content

Philia and Agape: Ancient Greek Ethics of Friendship and Christian Theology of Love

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Love and Friendship Across Cultures

Abstract

Based on a philosophical interpretation of the Ancient concepts, philia and agape, the present contribution offers a comparative study of the ancient Greek ethics of friendship and the Christian theology of love. While the former tradition understands philia as a finite relationship between human selves within a sociopolitical context, agape is regarded by the latter tradition as the bond of love which God grants all humans who believe in Jesus Christ as the Messiah. Despite the fundamental differences between the two conceptions of love, they converge at one point, namely in the caring concern for the stranger, who humans are called upon to receive in hospitality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Nygren (19361938, 11–20, 57–58).

  2. 2.

    For critical comments on Nygren’s account of eros, see Armstrong (1961), Rist (1964), Osbourne (1994), White (2004).

  3. 3.

    Eberhard Jüngel offers a different account of the Christian conception of love and raises doubts about Nygren’s clear-cut distinction between eros and agape, see Jüngel (1977, pp. 434–436). A thorough discussion of Nygren’s and Jüngel’s studies on love can be found in Jeanrod (2010, pp. 27–30).

  4. 4.

    Using Prodikos as an example, Dover offers a detailed account of eros as a double desire, see Dover (1989, p. 43).

  5. 5.

    Nicomachean Ethics IX, 9, 1171 a.

  6. 6.

    Nicomachean Ethics VIII, 1, 1155 a.

  7. 7.

    Nietzsche, Jenseits von Gut und Böse, 46; see also Nygren (19361938, p. 6) and Jüngel (1999, p. 1).

  8. 8.

    Benveniste (1969, pp. 335–353).

  9. 9.

    Herman (2002, p. 6).

  10. 10.

    Benveniste (1969, p. 343), Herman (2002, p. 50), Konstan (1999, p. 33).

  11. 11.

    Lysis 221e–222a.

  12. 12.

    Nichols (2009, pp. 115–117, 150–152).

  13. 13.

    Politics 1261 b.

  14. 14.

    Nicomachean Ethics VIII, 1, 1155 a.

  15. 15.

    Idem.

  16. 16.

    MacIntyre (2000, p. 155).

  17. 17.

    Nicomachean Ethics I, 7, 1099a.

  18. 18.

    Nicomachean Ethics IX, 9, 1169b–1170a.

  19. 19.

    Lysis 215a–b; Nicomachean Ethics IX, 9, 1169b.

  20. 20.

    Nicomachean Ethics IX, 4, 1166a.

  21. 21.

    Nicomachean Ethics I, 7, 1097b (slightly modified translation).

  22. 22.

    Magna Moralia 1213a.

  23. 23.

    Nicomachean Ethics VIII, 1, 1155a.

  24. 24.

    Nicomachean Ethics VIII, 5, 1157b.

  25. 25.

    Poetics 14, 1453b.

  26. 26.

    Nygren (19361938, p. 30).

  27. 27.

    Luke 10:25–37.

  28. 28.

    Matthew 6:3.

  29. 29.

    Jacob’s Letter 1:8.

  30. 30.

    Romans 7:19.

  31. 31.

    John 10:9, 14:6.

  32. 32.

    Nicomachean Ethics IX, 8–9, 1168b–1170b.

  33. 33.

    Søren Kierkegaard, Works of Love, II C.

  34. 34.

    Hebrews 13:2.

  35. 35.

    See Hiltbrunner (2005, pp. 164–165).

  36. 36.

    Nicomachean Ethics, VIII, 1, 1155a.

  37. 37.

    Eudemian Ethics 1239b.

  38. 38.

    Matthew 18:20.

  39. 39.

    Matthew 26:17–30.

  40. 40.

    Augustine (2008), Book 4, “Death of a dear friend”; Aquinas (1969, vol. 29, q 9, a. 1 ad 2).

  41. 41.

    Steve Summers has elaborated further on the significance of hospitality for the Christian theology of love, see especially Chap. 7 in Friendship.

References

  • Aquinas, T. (1969). Summa theologiae. London and New York: Blackfriars.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. (1932). Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. (1961). Eudemian Ethics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. (1962). Magna Moralia. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. (2005). Poetics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. (2014). Nicomachean Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, A. H. (1961). Platonic eros and Christian agape. Downside Review, 79(255), 105–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Augustine. (2008). Confessions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benveniste, É. (1969). Le vocabulaire des institutions indo-européennes I. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dover, K. J. (1989). Greek Homosexuality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, G. (2002). Ritualised friendship & The Greek city. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiltbrunner, O. (2005). Gastfreundschaft in der Antike und im Frühen Christentum. Darmstadt: WBG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeanrod, W. G. (2010). A theology of love. London, New York: T & T Clark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jüngel, E. (1977). Gott als Geheimnis der Welt. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jüngel, E. (1999). Das Evangelium von der Rechtfertigung des Gottlosen als Zentrum des christilichen Glaubens. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kierkegaard, S. (1995). Works of love. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konstan, D. (1999). Friendship in the classical world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (2000). After Virtue. A study in moral theory. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, M. P. (2009). Socrates on friendship and community: Reflections on Plato’s symposium, phaedrus, and lysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, F. Jenseits von Gut und Böse. In KSA 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nygren, A. (1936–1938). Den kristna kärlekstanken genom tiderna: Eros och Agape. Stockholm: Svenska Kyrkens Diakonistyrelses bokförlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osbourne, C. (1994). Eros unveiled: Plato and the god of love. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato. (2001). Lysis. In Werke I. Darmstadt: WBG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rist, J. M. (1964). Eros and Psyche: Studies in Plato, Plotinus and Origen. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Summers, S. Friendship: Exploring its implications for the Church in postmodernity. London, New York: T & T Clark.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Holy Bible. (1982). Nashville: Thomas Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, F. C. (2004). Virtue in Plato’s symposium. Classical Quarterly, 54(2), 366–378.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonas Holst .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Holst, J. (2021). Philia and Agape: Ancient Greek Ethics of Friendship and Christian Theology of Love. In: Hongladarom, S., Joaquin, J.J. (eds) Love and Friendship Across Cultures. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4834-9_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics