Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Should academic ethics committees be available to review lapses in scientific integrity? No

  • Point and Counterpoint
  • Published:
HEC Forum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Judicial Council, Guidelines for Ethics Committees in Health Care Institutions,Journal of the American Medical Association. 1985; 253: 2698–99.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Iserson KV, Goffin FB, Markham JJ. The future functions of hospital ethics committees,HEC Forum. 1989;1:63–76.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Iserson, KV. Strategic planning for bioethics committees and networks,HEC Forum. 1991;3:117–27.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Department of Health and Human Services, Final Regulations Amending Basic HHS Policy for the Protection of Human Research Subjects,Federal Register 45 CFR Part 46, January 26, 1981;46:8366–92.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Association of American Medical Colleges, Framework for Institutional policies and procedures to deal with misconduct in research,Academic Medicine. 1989;64:561–66.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Warren Holleman Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cynthia Chappell Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Holleman, W., Chappell, C. Should academic ethics committees be available to review lapses in scientific integrity? No. HEC Forum 5, 47–51 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01454919

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01454919

Keywords

Search

Navigation