Abstract
Recent technical developments in genetictesting has led to a situation where the DNA inpreviously stored tissue samples can beextracted and used for genetic analysis. Thisraises the question of how to decide whether aspecific use of such samples should be allowed.Using the genetic testing of ancient DNA ingeneral, and the DNA of the pharaoh Tutankhamenin particular as examples this paper analysesthe question. It investigates whether ethicalframeworks based on proxy consent, culturalaffiliation, ownership, or the privacy rightsof the dead are appropriate and justifiable inthis context. The conclusion is that frameworksbased on proxy consent, cultural affiliation,and ownership are not very useful.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Brier B. The Murder of Tutankhamen. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1998.
El Mahdy C. Tutankhamen - The Life and Death of a Boy King. London: Headline, 2000.
Tyldesley J. The Private Lives of the Pharaohs. London: Macmillan, 2000.
David R. Archbold R. Conversations with Mummies. London: Harper Collins, 2000.
David AR. Disease in Egyptian Mummies: the contribution of new technologies. The Lancet 1997; 349: 1760–1763.
Wente EF. Who Was Who among the Royal Mummies? (Oriental Institute News and Notes, No. 144). Chicago: University of Chicago Oriental Institute, 1995.
Putting Tut to the Test - Experts Use DNA Tests to Determine King Tutankhamun's Lineage. Associated Press, November 8, 2000.
Egypt Postpones DNA Tests on Mummies of Tutankhamun, Presumed Grandfather. Associated Press, December 12, 2000.
Woodward S. Genealogy of New Kingdom pharaohs and queens. Archaeology 1996; 49: 45–47.
Paabo S. Molecular cloning of ancient Egyptian mummy DNA. Nature 1985; 314: 644–645.
Ashcroft R. The ethics of reusing archived tissue for research. Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology 2000; 26: 408–411.
Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Human Tissue: Ethical and Legal Issues. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics, 1995.
Monsalve MV, Cardenas F, Guhl F, Delaney AD, Devine DV. Phylogenetic analysis of mtDNA lineages in South American mummies. Annals of Human Genetics 1996; 60(pt4): 293–303.
Lambert-Zazulak P. The international ancient Egyptian mummy tissue bank at the Manchester Museum. Antiquity 2000; 74: 44–49.
Buchanan AE, Brock DW. Deciding for Others - The Ethics of Surrogate Decision Making. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
Anderson B. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso, 1983.
Fowler B. Iceman - Uncovering the Life and Times of a Prehistoric Man Found in an Alpine Glacier. New York: Random House, 2000.
Handt O et al. Molecular genetic analyses of the Tyrolean Ice Man. Science 1994; 264: 1775–1778.
Beyleveld D, Brownsword R. My Body, My Body Parts, My Property? Health Care Analysis 2000; 8: 87–99.
Bahn P. Do not disturb: Archaeology and the rights of the dead. Journal of Applied Philosophy 1984; 1: 213–226.
Partridge E. Posthumous interests and posthumous respect. Ethics 1981; 91: 243–264.
Belliotti RA. Do dead human beings have rights? Personalist 1979; 60: 201–210.
Levenbook BB. Harming someone after his death. Ethics 1984; 94: 407–419.
Hockey J. Katz J. Small E, eds Grief, Mourning and Death Ritual. London: Open University Press, 2001.
Davies DJ. Death, Ritual and Belief. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group, 1997.
Nathan B. Egyptian mummies. Lancet 1997; 350: 450.
Richardson R. A potted history of specimen-taking. Lancet 2000; 355: 935–936.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Holm, S. The Privacy of Tutankhamen – Utilising The Genetic Information In Stored Tissue Samples. Theor Med Bioeth 22, 437–449 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013010918460
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013010918460