Abstract
The purpose of the paper is to show that semanticexternalism – the thesis that contents are notdetermined by ``individualistic'' features of mentalstates – is mistaken. Externalist thinking, it isargued, rests on two mistaken assumptions: theassumption that if there is an externalist wayof describing a situation the situation exemplifiesexternalism, and the assumption that cases in which adifference in the environment of an intentional stateentails a difference in the state's intentional objectare cases in which environmental factors determine thestate's content. Exposing these mistakes leads to seethat the conditions that are required for thetruth of externalism are inconsistent.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Burge, T.: 1979, ‘Individualism and the Mental’, in P. A. French, T. E. Vehling Jr., and H. K. Wettstein (eds), Midwest Studies in Philosophy Vol 4: Studies in Metaphysics, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 73–121.
Burge, T.: 1982:, ‘Other Bodies’, in Woodfield A. (ed.), Thought and Object: Essays on Intentionality, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Burge, T.: 1986, ‘Cartesian Error and the Objectivity of Perception’, in Petit P. and Mc-Dowell J.(eds), Subject, Thought, and Context Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 117–136.
Burge, T.: 1988, ‘Individualism and Self-Knowledge’, Journal of Philosophy 85, 649–663.
Devitt, M.: 1989, ‘Against Direct Reference’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 13, 205–240.
Devitt, M.: 1990, ‘Meanings Just Ain't in the Head’, in G. Boolose (ed.), Meaning and Method: Essays in Honor of Hilary Putnam, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Donnellan, K.: 1966, ‘Reference and DefiniteDescriptions’,Philosophical Review 75, 208–234.
Dretske, F.: 1995, Naturalizing the Mind,MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Fodor, J.: 1981, ‘The Present Status of the Innateness Controversy’, inhis Representations, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Fodor, J.: 1987, Psychosemantics: The Problemof Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Fodor, J.: 1994, The Elm and theExpert, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
Horowitz, A.: 1996, ‘Putnam, Searle, and Externalism’,Philosophical Studies 81, 27–59.
Jacobson, H.: forthcoming, ‘Syntax, Semantics, and IntentionalAspects’.
Kaplan, D.: 1989, ‘Demonstratives: An Essay on the Semantics, Logic, Metaphysics, andEpistemology of Demonstratives and other Indexicals’, in J. Perry and others (eds), Themes from Kaplan, Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York, 481–563.
Kim, J.: 1984, ‘Concepts ofSupervenience’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 45, 153–176.
Kripke, S.: 1980,Naming and Necessity, Blackwell, Oxford.
McDowell, J.: 1986, ‘Singular Thought and the Extentof Inner Space’, in P. Petit and J. McDowell (eds), Subject, Thought, and Context, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 137–168.
Putnam, H.: 1975, ‘The Meaning of ‘Meaning’ ’, in his Mind,Language, reality, (Philosophical Papers, Volume 2), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 215–271.
Putnam, H.: 1981, Reason, Truth and History, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Putnam, H.: 1983, ‘Computational Psychology and Interpretation Theory’, in his Realism and Reason (Philosophical Papers, Volume 3), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 139–154.
Putnam, H.:1988, Representation and Reality, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Searle, J.: 1983,Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Stich, S.:1983, From Folk Psychology to Cognitive Science: The Case Against Belief, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Tye, M.: 1995, Ten Problems of Consciousness, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Zemach, E.:1976, ‘Putnam's Theory on the Reference of Substance Terms’, Journal of Philosophy 73, 216–227. Cambridge, MA U.S.A. E-mail: hjacobs@fas.harvard.edu
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Horowitz, A. Contents Just Are In The Head. Erkenntnis 54, 321–344 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010747032196
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010747032196