Skip to main content
Log in

Unity and Disunity in Landmarks: The Rivalry Between Petr Struve and Mikhail Gershenzon

  • Published:
Studies in East European Thought Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article the most important text of twentieth-century Russian intellectual history, Landmarks (Vekhi) (1909) comes under reexamination. Looking at the rivalry of the volume's two organizers, Mikhail Gershenzon and Petr Struve, Professor Brian Horowitz explains why Landmarks succeeded in offering such a biting critique of radical ideology, while lacking its own internal intellectual unity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Horowitz, B. Unity and Disunity in Landmarks: The Rivalry Between Petr Struve and Mikhail Gershenzon. Studies in East European Thought 51, 61–78 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008678327610

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008678327610

Navigation