Abstract
In this article the most important text of twentieth-century Russian intellectual history, Landmarks (Vekhi) (1909) comes under reexamination. Looking at the rivalry of the volume's two organizers, Mikhail Gershenzon and Petr Struve, Professor Brian Horowitz explains why Landmarks succeeded in offering such a biting critique of radical ideology, while lacking its own internal intellectual unity.
Similar content being viewed by others
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Horowitz, B. Unity and Disunity in Landmarks: The Rivalry Between Petr Struve and Mikhail Gershenzon. Studies in East European Thought 51, 61–78 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008678327610
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008678327610