Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Methods of incorporating common element characteristics for law article prediction

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Artificial Intelligence and Law Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Law article prediction is a task of predicting the relevant laws and regulations involved in a case according to the description text of the case, and it has broad application prospects in improving judicial efficiency. In the existing research work, researchers often only consider a single case, employing the neural network method to extract features for prediction, which lack the mining of related and common element information between different data. In order to solve this problem, we propose a law article prediction method that integrates the characteristics of common elements. It can effectively utilize the co-occurrence information of the training data, fully mine the relevant common elements between cases, and fuse local features. Experiments show that our method performs well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bao Q, Zan H, Gong P, Chen J, Xiao Y (2019) Charge prediction with legal attention. In: CCF International Conference on Natural Language Processing and Chinese Computing, pp 447–458. Springer

  • Battaglia PW, Hamrick JB, Bapst V, Sanchez-Gonzalez A, Zambaldi V, Malinowski M, Tacchetti A, Raposo D, Faulkner ASR, Gulcehre C et al. (2021) Relational inductive biases, deep learning, and graph networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.01261

  • Bruna J, Zaremba W, Szlam A, LeCun Y (2014) Spectral networks and locally connected networks on graphs. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6203

  • Cai H, Zheng VW, Chang KC-C (2018) A comprehensive survey of graph embedding: problems, techniques, and applications. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 30(9):1616–1637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen H, Cai D, Dai W, Dai Z, Ding Y (2019) Charge-based prison term prediction with deep gating network. In: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), pp 6362–6367

  • Cortes C, Vapnik V (1995) Support-vector networks. Mach Learn 20(3):273–297

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Duvenaud DK, Maclaurin D, Iparraguirre J, Bombarell R, Hirzel T, Aspuru-Guzik A, Adams RP (2015) Convolutional networks on graphs for learning molecular fingerprints. Advances in neural information processing systems 28

  • Gan L, Kuang K, Yang Y, Wu F (2021) Judgment prediction via injecting legal knowledge into neural networks. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 35, pp 12866–12874

  • Gilmer J, Schoenholz SS, Riley PF, Vinyals O, Dahl GE (2017) Neural message passing for quantum chemistry. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp 1263–1272. PMLR

  • Hochreiter S, Schmidhuber J (1997) Long short-term memory. Neural Comput 9(8):1735–1780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu Z, Li X, Tu C, Liu Z, Sun M (2018) Few-shot charge prediction with discriminative legal attributes. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pp 487–498

  • Kenton JDM-WC, Toutanova LK (2019) Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In: Proceedings of NAACL-HLT, pp 4171–4186

  • Kim Y (2014) Convolutional neural networks for sentence classification. In: EMNLP

  • Kingma DP, Ba J (2015) Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. In: ICLR (Poster)

  • Lauderdale BE, Clark TS (2012) The supreme court’s many median justices. Am Political Sci Rev 106(4):847–866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin T-Y, Goyal P, Girshick R, He K, Dollár P (2017) Focal loss for dense object detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pp 2980–2988

  • Lin W-C, Kuo T-T, Chang T-J, Yen C-A, Chen C-J, Lin S-d (2012) Exploiting machine learning models for chinese legal documents labeling, case classification, and sentencing prediction. Proc ROCLING 17(4):140

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu C-L, Chang C-T, Ho J-H (2004) Case instance generation and refinement for case-based criminal summary judgments in chinese

  • Liu C-L, Hsieh C-D (2006) Exploring phrase-based classification of judicial documents for criminal charges in chinese. In: International Symposium on Methodologies for Intelligent Systems, pp 681–690. Springer

  • Liu P, Qiu X, Huang X (2016) Recurrent neural network for text classification with multi-task learning. In: IJCAI

  • Liu X, You X, Zhang X, Wu J, Lv P (2020) Tensor graph convolutional networks for text classification. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 34, pp 8409–8416

  • Luo B, Feng Y, Xu J, Zhang X, Zhao D (2017) Learning to predict charges for criminal cases with legal basis. In: EMNLP

  • Mikolov T, Sutskever I, Chen K, Corrado GS, Dean J (2013) Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. Advances in neural information processing systems 26

  • Nagel SS (1963) Applying correlation analysis to case prediction. Tex L Rev 42:1006

    Google Scholar 

  • Salton G, Buckley C (1988) Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. Inf Process Manag 24(5):513–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sulea O-M, Zampieri M, Malmasi S, Vela M, Dinu LP, van Genabith J (2017) Exploring the use of text classification in the legal domain. Arxiv e-prints arXiv:1710.09306, 1710

  • Vaswani A, Shazeer N, Parmar N, Uszkoreit J, Jones L, Gomez AN, Kaiser Ł, Polosukhin I (2017) Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems 30

  • Xiao C, Zhong H, Guo Z, Tu C, Liu Z, Sun M, Feng Y, Han X, Hu Z, Wang H et al. (2018) Cail2018: A large-scale legal dataset for judgment prediction. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.02478

  • Xu N, Wang P, Chen L, Pan L, Wang X, Zhao J (2020) Distinguish confusing law articles for legal judgment prediction. In: Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp 3086–3095

  • Yang W, Jia W, Zhou X, Luo Y (2019) Legal judgment prediction via multi-perspective bi-feedback network. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 4085–4091

  • Yang Z, Yang D, Dyer C, He X, Smola A, Hovy E (2016) Hierarchical attention networks for document classification. In: Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pp 1480–1489

  • Yan G, Li Y, Shen S, Zhang S, Liu J (2019) Law article prediction based on deep learning. In: 2019 IEEE 19th International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security Companion (QRS-C), pp 281–284. IEEE

  • Yao L, Mao C, Luo Y (2019) Graph convolutional networks for text classification. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 33, pp 7370–7377

  • Ye H, Jiang X, Luo Z, Chao W (2018) Interpretable charge predictions for criminal cases: Learning to generate court views from fact descriptions. In: Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers), pp 1854–1864

  • Yue L, Liu Q, Jin B, Wu H, Zhang K, An Y, Cheng M, Yin B, Wu D (2021) Neurjudge: A circumstance-aware neural framework for legal judgment prediction. In Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp 973-982

  • Zhang Y, Yu X, Cui Z, Wu S, Wen Z, Wang L (2020) Every document owns its structure: Inductive text classification via graph neural networks. In: Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp 334–339

  • Zhong H, Guo Z, Tu C, Xiao C, Liu Z, Sun M (2018) Legal judgment prediction via topological learning. In: Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp 3540–3549

  • Zhong H, Xiao C, Tu C, Zhang T, Liu Z, Sun M (2020) How does nlp benefit legal system: A summary of legal artificial intelligence. In: Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp 5218–5230

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Key R &D Program of China under Grant No.2020TYC0832400.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ge Cheng.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hou, Y., Cheng, G., Zhang, Y. et al. Methods of incorporating common element characteristics for law article prediction. Artif Intell Law (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-023-09359-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-023-09359-6

Keywords

Navigation