Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Conceivability and the ontological argument

  • Published:
Sophia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Leibnitz,New Essays Concerning Human Understanding, translated by Alfred Langley (LaSalle, Illinois: Open Court Publishing Company, 1949, pp. 504–5).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ibid., pp. 714–15).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ibid., pp. 714–15).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Charles Hartshore, “Ten Ontological or Modal Proofs for God's Existence”,The Logic of Perfection and Other Essays in NeoClassical Metaphysics (LaSalle, Illinois: Open Court, 1962, pp. 40–4 esp.).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Charles Hartshorne, “What Did Anselm Discover?”,Union Seminary Quarterly Review, 17:213–22, March, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Godel, “Uber formal unentscheidbare Satze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter System I”,Monatshefte fur Mathematik und Physik, 38:173–98, 1931; and Alonzo Church, “A Note on the Entscheidungsproblem”,Journal of Symbolic Logic, 1:40–1, 101, 1936. Quine regards Church's proof as decisive. For a complete exposition of the view that logical concepts derive various meanings in various systems, see Hilbert and Bernavs,Grundlagen der Mathematik, esp. vol. 2, pp. 392–416 (Berlin: Springer, 1939). A brief but illuminating discussion of this issue can be found in an article by John Myhill, “Some Philosophical Implications of Mathematical Logic”,Review of Metaphysics, 6:165–98, December, 1952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Frederick Fitch,Symbolic Logic (New York: Roland Press, 1952) p. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  8. G. H. Von Wright, “Form and Content in Logic”, reprinted inLogical Studies (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1957).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stephen Toulmin,The Philosophy of Science: an Introduction (New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1960), p. 158.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Florida Southern College, U.S.A.

    Leroy T. Howe

Authors
  1. Leroy T. Howe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Howe, L.T. Conceivability and the ontological argument. SOPH 5, 3–8 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02822354

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02822354

Keywords

Search

Navigation