Skip to main content
Log in

Review essay

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Born, M. (ed.): 1971, The Born-Einstein Letters: The Correspondence between Albert Einstein and Max and Hedwig Born from 1916 to 1955, I. Born (trans.), Walker, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, A.: 1953, ‘Elementare Überlegungen zur Interpretation der Grundlagen der Quanten-Mechanik’, in Scientific Papers Presented to Max Born, Hafner, New York, pp. 33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., and Rosen, N.: 1935, ‘Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?’, Physical Review 47, 777–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fine, A.: 1990, ‘Einstein and Ensembles: Response’, Foundations of Physics 20, 967–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guy. R. and Deltete, R.: 1990, ‘Fine, Einstein, and Ensembles’, Foundations of Physics 20, 943–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holton. G.: 1968, ‘Mach, Einstein, and the Search for Reality’, Daedalus 97, 636–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, D.: 1984, ‘Realism and Conventionalism in Einstein's Philosophy of Science: The Einstein-Schlick Correspondence’, Philosophia Naturalis 21, 618–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, D.: 1985, ‘Einstein on Locality and Separability’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 16, 171–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, D.: 1989, ‘Holism, Separability, and the Metaphysical Implications of the Bell Experiments’, in J. T. Cushing and E. McMullin (eds.), Philosophical Consequences of Quantum Theory: Reflections on Bell's Theorem, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana, pp. 224–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, D.: 1990a, ‘Einstein and Duhem’, in R. Ariew and P. Barker (eds.), Pierre Duhem: Historian and Philosopher of Science, Proceedings of the Conference at Virginia Polytechnic and State University, 16–18 March, 1989, Synthese 83, 363–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, D.: 1990b, ‘“Nicht sein kann was nicht sein darf”, or The Prehistory of EPR, 1909–1935: Einstein's Early Worries about the Quantum Mechanics of Composite Systems’, in A. I. Miller (ed.), Sixty-two Years of Uncertainty: Historical, Philosophical, and Physical Inquiries into the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Plenum, New York, pp. 61–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jungnickel, C. and R. McCormmach: 1986, Intellectual Mastery of Nature: Theoretical Physics from Ohm to Einstein, 2 vols, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Planck, M.: 1909, ‘Die Einheit des physikalischen Weltbildes’, Physikalische Zeitschrift 10, 62–75. (Lecture, 9 December 1908, University of Leiden.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H.: 1976, ‘Realism and Reason’, Presidential Address to the Eastern Division of the American Philosophical Association, Boston, 29 December 1976, reprinted in Meaning and the Moral Sciences, Routledge & Kegan Paul, Boston, London, and Henley, 1978, pp. 123–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speziali, P. (ed.): 1972, Albert Einstein/Michele Besso: Correspondence, 1903–1955, Hermann, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stachel, J.: 1986, ‘Einstein and the Quantum: Fifty Years of Struggle’, in R. G. Colodny (ed.), From Quarks to Quasars: Philosophical Problems of Modern Physics, University of Pittsburgh Series in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 7, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, pp. 349–85.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Howard, D. Review essay. Synthese 86, 123–141 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00485417

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00485417

Navigation