Skip to main content
Log in

Geochronology as a metaphysical research programme

  • Aufsätze
  • Published:
Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

In diesem Artikel wird der wissenschaftstheoretische Stand der Geochronologie mit Hintergrund in den Arbeiten von Kuhn und besonders Popper diskutiert. Die Geochronologie wird untersucht mit Hinblick auf generelle methodologische Voraussetzungen, Terminologie, normalwissenschaftliche Aktivitätsform und “theoretische Dogmatik”. Als Konklusion ergibt sich, daß die fundamentalen Theoriekonstruktionen der Geochronologie nicht testbar sind, sondern als ein metaphysisches Forschungsprogramm im Sinne Poppers charakterisiert werden müssen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Schilpp, P.A. (ed.):The Philosophy of Karl Popper, La Salle 1974, p. 134.

  2. Kuhn, T.S.:The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago, 1962.

  3. Gould, S.J.: “Catastrophes & Steady State Earth”,Nat. Hist. 80 (1975) no. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See Berry, W.B.N.:Growth of a Prehistoric Time Scale, London 1968, p. 5.

  5. See Burchfield, J.E.:Lord Kelvin and the Age of the Earth, London 1975, p. 17.

  6. Holmes, A.A.: “Revised Geological Time-Scale”,Trans. Eding. Geo. Soc. 17 (1969) p. 203.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Harper (ed.):Geochronology: Radiometric Dating of Rocks and Minerals, Stroudsburg, 1973, p. 2 and p. 5–6.

  8. Gentry, R.V.: “Radioactive Halos”,Ann. Rev. Nuc. Sci. 23 (1973) p. 347–362.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Emery, G.T.: “Pertubations of nuclear decay rates”,Ann. Rev. Nuc. Sci. 22, p. 165 f.

  10. Thornes, J.B. & Brundsden, D.:Geomorphology and Time, London 1977, p. 28.

  11. Holmes, Arthur: “Absolute” Age: a Meaningless Term',Nature vol. 196 (1962), p. 1238.

    Google Scholar 

  12. op. cit. n. 2, p. 151.

  13. Brown, P.E. & Miller, J.A.: “Interpretation of isotopic ages in orogenic Belts”,Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, Special Publication No. 3 (1969) p. 137.

  14. Armstrong, R.L. and Besancon, J.: “A Triassic Time Scale Dilemma”,Ecologae Geologicae Helvetiae 63 (1970) 21, 3 p. 19.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stewart, J.W. et al.: “Age Determination from Andean Peru”,Geo. soc. Am. Bull. 85 (1974) p. 1108.

    Google Scholar 

  16. op. cit. n. 2, p. 47

  17. Bulletin 80, National Research Council, 1931, p. 431.

  18. Knopf, A.: “Measuring Geologic Time”,Scientific Monthly, vol. 85 (1957), p. 227.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Faul, H.: “Geologic Time Scale”,Bull Geo. Soc. Am. vol. 171 (1960) p. 640.

    Google Scholar 

  20. n. 2, p. 38.

    Google Scholar 

  21. In Harland, W.B. etc. (ed.):The Phanerozoic Time-Scale, London 1964, p. 27

  22. J. Geophysical Res. 73 (1968) p. 2813.

  23. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 32, p. 131.

  24. York, D. & Farquhar, R.M.:The Earth's Age and Geochronology, Oxford 1972, p. 75.

  25. Popper, K.R.:The Logic of Scientific Discovery, London 1959, p. 41.

  26. Popper, K.R.:The Poverty of Historicism, London 1957.

  27. op. cit. n. 2, p. 145.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I wish to thank Bo Holm Jacobsen and Niels Abrahamsen, both Institute of Geology, University of Aarhus, for their detailed and constructive criticism of an earlier version of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Øhrstrøm, P. Geochronology as a metaphysical research programme. Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 18, 204–214 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01801086

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01801086

Keywords

Navigation