Skip to main content
Log in

Strange eros: Foucault, ethics, and the historical a priori

  • Published:
Continental Philosophy Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This essay explores Foucault’s conception of the historical a priori through the lens of an archival ethics of eros. Highlighting the paradoxical nature of the historical a priori as both constitutive and contingent, it harnesses the temporal dynamism of experiences of the untimely as erotic. Drawing on the work of Anne Carson, the essay brings out the strangeness of eros as an ancient Greek word that remains unintelligible to us. That strangeness signals an ethics of dissonant attunement to the untimeliness of the historical a priori. Such an ethics of eros names those experiences of connection and rupture that both bind and unbind us in relation to a biopolitical present that is radically unstable. Reading eros as strange thus ultimately allows us to find resources for an ethics of self-transformation in Foucault’s reflections on the temporal instability that the historical a priori names.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For a classic reflection on ethics in this vein see Williams (1986).

  2. For an exploration of eros in History of Madness see Huffer (2010).

  3. For a helpful reading of the archive as the “positive condition” of our knowledge see Nealon (2014).

  4. For a relevant discussion of “temporal dispersion” in The Archeology of Knowledge see Webb (2013).

  5. See especially Han (2002) and Allen (2008).

  6. “Juxtaposed,” Foucault writes, “these two words [historical a priori] produce a rather startling effect” (AK, 127).

  7. In the 1961 preface to History of Madness Foucault challenges a conception of history that would suppose a “victory” or even “the right to victory” in us: We must leave “in suspense anything that might take on the appearance of an ending, or of rest in truth” (HM, xxviii).

  8. As Webb points out, that Other is less an allusion to a Levinasian ethical alterity than “a warning against treating time as a unity and, through memory, as the privileged form of interiority” (2013, 46). Although this Other is not Levinasian, Webb finds in Foucault’s historical a priori resources for “a renewal of ethical practice” (2013, 165).

  9. See especially Freud (2010) and Marcuse (1966).

  10. For a book-length articulation of his “doubts” about the repressive hypothesis, see Foucault HS1.

  11. For French original see DEQ1, 191.

  12. For a more detailed examination of the time of unreason in History of Madness, see Huffer (2014). Also see Hacking (2014).

  13. On ethics as Nietzschean recoil see Scott (1990).

References

  • Allen, Amy. 2008. The politics of ourselves: Power, autonomy, and gender in contemporary critical theory. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthes, Roland. 1978. A Lover’s Discourse: Fragments. Trans. Richard Howard. New York: Hill and Wang.

  • Carson, Anne. 1986. Eros: The bittersweet. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, Anne. 2010. Nox. New York: New Directions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, Sigmund. 2010. Civilization and Its Discontents. Trans. James Strachey. New York: Norton.

  • Hacking, Ian. 2014. Déraison. In Foucault now: Current perspectives in Foucault studies, ed. James D. Faubion, 38–51. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han-Pile, Béatrice. 2002. Foucault’s Critical Project: Between the Transcendental and the Historical. Trans. Edward Pile. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

  • Huffer, Lynne. 2014. Foucault’s evil genius. In Foucault now: Current perspectives in foucault studies, ed. James D. Faubion, 52–70. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huffer, Lynne. 2010. Mad for Foucault: Rethinking the foundations of queer theory. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse, Herbert. 1966. Eros and civilization: A philosophical inquiry into Freud. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nealon, Jeffrey. 2014. Historical a priori. In The Cambridge Foucault Lexicon, ed. Leonard Lawlor, and John Nale, 204–205. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, Martha. 1979. The speech of Alcibiades: A reading of Plato’s symposium. Philosophy and Literature 3(2): 131–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nehamas, Alexander. 1989. Plato. Symposium. Trans. Alexander Nehamas and Paul Woodruff. Indianapolis: Hackett.

  • Rajchman, John. 1991. Truth and eros: Foucault, Lacan, and the question of ethics. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, Charles. 1990. The question of ethics: Nietzsche, Foucault, Heidegger. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoler, Ann. 1995. Race and the education of desire: Foucault’s history of sexuality and the colonial order of things. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, David. 2013. Foucault’s archeology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Bernard. 1986. Ethics and the limits of philosophy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lynne Huffer.

Appendix 1: Foucault abbreviations

Appendix 1: Foucault abbreviations

AK The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language, trans. A.M. Sheridan Smith. New York: Pantheon, 1972.

DEQ Dits et écrits, 1954–1988, 2 vols. Paris: Quarto Gallimard, 2001.

DP Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, trans. Alan Sheridan. New York: Vintage, 1977.

HM History of Madness, ed. Jean Khalfa, trans. Jonathan Murphy and Jean Khalfa. New York: Routledge, 2006.

HS1 The History of Sexuality, volume 1: An Introduction, trans. Robert Hurley. New York: Vintage, 1978.

NGH “Nietzsche, Genealogy, History,” in Aesthetics, Method, and Epistemology: Essential Works of Foucault, 1954–1984, volume 2, ed. James D. Faubion. New York: The New Press, 1998.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huffer, L. Strange eros: Foucault, ethics, and the historical a priori. Cont Philos Rev 49, 103–114 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-015-9358-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-015-9358-9

Keywords

Navigation