Abstract
Coordination problems, problems in which each agent's expected utility depends upon what other agents do, pose a problem for act utilitarianism. When the agents are act utilitarians and know of each other that they are so, they seem unable to achieve optimal outcomes in certain coordination problems. I examine various ways the act utilitarian might attempt to solve this problem, where act utilitarianism is interpreted within the framework of subjective expected utility theory. In particular, a new method for computing expected utility,dynamic deliberation, deserves examination as a possible act utilitarian solution to coordination problems. I argue that even dynamic deliberation fails to give the act utilitarian what he needs in coordination problems, and that the failure of act utilitarianism for such problems suggests the need for an alternative theory of moral choice along rule utilitarian lines.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Foot, P. (ed.): 1967,Theories of Ethics, Oxford University Press, London.
Gibbard, A.: 1978, ‘Act-Utilitarian Agreements’, in A. Goldman and J. Kim (eds.),Values and Morals, D. Reidel, Dordrect.
Gilbert, M.: 1989,On Social Facts, Princeton University Press.
Goldman, H.: 1978, ‘Doing the Best One Can’, in A. Goldman and J. Kim (eds.),Values and Morals, D. Reidel, Dordrect.
Hodgson, D. H.: 1967,Consequences of Utilitarianism, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Hume, D.: 1968,A Treatise of Human Nature, Oxford University Press, London.
Lewis, David: 1969,Convention: A Philosophical Study, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Lewis, D.: 1972, ‘Utilitarianism and Truthfulness’,Australasian Journal of Philosophy 50, 17–19.
Luce, R. D. and Raiffa, H.: 1957,Games and Decisions, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Narveson, Jan.: 1976, ‘Utilitarianism, Group Actions, and Coordination, or, Must the Utilitarian be a Buridan's Ass?’,Nous 10, 173–94.
Rawls, J.: 1955, ‘Two Concepts of Rules’, reprinted in Foot (1967).
Regan, D.: 1980,Utilitarianism and Co-operation, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Richter, R.: 1985, ‘Rationality, Group Choice and Expected Utility’,Synthese 63, 203–232.
Silverstein, H.: 1979, ‘Utilitarianism and Group Coordination’,Noûs XIII(3), 335–360.
Skyrms, Brian: 1990,The Dynamics of Rational Deliberation, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass..
Smart. J. J. C.: 1956, ‘Extreme and Restricted Utilitarianism’, reprinted in Foot (1967).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hunter, D. Act utilitarianism and dynamic deliberation. Erkenntnis 41, 1–35 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01128908
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01128908