Skip to main content

Women’s Misery and Women’s Rights in International Law and Literature: Wollstonecraft, Malthus, Bentham, and Shelley

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
British Modern International Thought in the Making

Part of the book series: International Political Theory ((IPoT))

Abstract

In this chapter, Eileen M. Hunt reveals new intellectual ties between Bentham and Benthamite thought and the political ideals of Wollstonecraft and Shelley, who theorized the relationship between women’s misery and women’s rights in British international thought from the end of the eighteenth century through the first few decades of the nineteenth century. Hunt argues that Wollstonecraft’s political ideas influenced her daughter Mary Shelley, leading her to develop a critique of Malthusian and Benthamite views on misery and population control that inscribed new political and feminist arguments into the global reception of British international thought.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Adami, Rebecca, and Dan Plesch. 2021. Women and the UN: A New History of Women’s International Human Rights. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Addams, Jane, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Ida Husted Harper, Anna Howard Shaw, Matilda Gage, Susan B. Anthony, Harriot Stanton Blatch, and Alice Stone Blackwell. 2018. Votes for Women: Complete History of the Women’s Suffrage Movement in U.S. (Including Biographies & Memoirs of Most Influential Suffragettes): Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Alice Paul, Lucy Stone, Carrie Chapman Catt, Susan B. Anthony, Anna Howard Shaw, Jane Addams. e-artnow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archives.Nypl.Org. “John Gisborne Manuscript Material.” n.d. https://archives.nypl.org/cps/23456. Accessed August 31, 2022.

  • Armitage, David. 2012. Foundations of Modern International Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bashford, Alison, and Joyce E. Chaplin. 2016. The Essay in New Worlds. In The New Worlds of Thomas Malthus, 237–75. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, Betty T. 2022. Lives of the Great Romantics, Part III. New York: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, Jeremy. 1794. Panopticon. Bentham MSS. London, University College London.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1842. The Works of Jeremy Bentham, Now First Collected: Under the Superintendence of His Executor, John Bowring. Edinburgh: William Tait.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. The Panopticon Writings. London: Verso Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. The Book of Fallacies. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bible Gateway. “Ecclesiastes 8:6—New International Version.” Accessed September 5, 2022. Bible Gateway.com.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodleian Archives and Manuscripts. Manuscript: [Maria Reveley], n.d. https://archives.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/repositories/2/archival_objects/55510. Accessed August 31, 2022.

  • ———. Manuscript: [Mary Shelley], 1822–24. https://archives.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/repositories/2/archival_objects/55514. Accessed September 5, 2022.

  • ———. Manuscript, n.d. https://archives.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/repositories/2/archival_objects/58367. Accessed September 5, 2022.

  • ———. Margaret [Mason] to Mary Shelley, 17 Nov.?1822, n.d. https://archives.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/repositories/2/archival_objects/55612. Accessed September 5, 2022.

  • ———. Original Correspondence, [1780]–1835, n.d. https://archives.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/repositories/2/archival_objects/55115. Accessed September 4, 2022.

  • Botting, Eileen Hunt. 2012. Family Feuds: Wollstonecraft, Burke, and Rousseau on the Transformation of the Family. New York: University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botting, Eileen Hunt. 2016. Wollstonecraft, Mill, and Women’s Human Rights. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Botting, Eileen Hunt. 2018. Mary Shelley and the Rights of the Child: Political Philosophy in Frankenstein. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botting, Eileen Hunt. 2019. Mary Shelley’s “Romantic Spinozism.” History of European Ideas 45 (8): 1125–1142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2020a. Opinion: Mary Shelley Created “Frankenstein,” and Then a Pandemic. The New York Times, March 13, 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2020b. Artificial Life After Frankenstein. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botting, Eileen Hunt, Christine Carey Wilkerson, and Elizabeth N. Kozlow. 2014. Wollstonecraft as an international feminist meme. Journal of Women’s History 26 (2): 13–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, Edmund. 1790. Reflections on the Revolution in France and on the Proceedings in Certain Societies in London Relative to That Event: In a Letter Intended to Have Been Sent to a Gentleman in Paris. 2nd edn. Early American Imprints. First Series; No. 23238. London: J. Dodsley, reprinted by Hugh Gaine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Causer, Tim, Margot Finn, and Philip Schofield. 2022. Jeremy Bentham and Australia: Convicts, Utility and Empire. London: UCL Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Kristen R. 2022. “Secrecy or Silence with her Finger on Her Mouth”: Jeremy Bentham’s Other Model of Visibility and Power. Political Theory 50 (4): 596–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crook, Nora. 2020. Mary Shelley’s Literary Lives and Other Writings, vol. 4. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • de Beauvoir, Simone. 1989. Le Deuxième Sexe. London: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Document. African American Newspapers, Series 2. Readex. n.d. Accessed September 5, 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gisborne, Maria. 1951. Maria Gisborne & Edward E. Williams, Shelley’s Friends: Their Journals and Letters. Ed. Frederick L. Jones, Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glendon, Mary Ann. 2002. A World Made New: Eleanor Roosevelt and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. London: Random House Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godwin, William. 1798a. Enquiry Concerning Political Justice, and Its Influence on Morals and Happiness. G.G. and J. Robinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1798b. Memoirs of the Author of a Vindication of the Rights of Woman. J. Johnson.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1820. Of Population: An Enquiry Concerning the Power of Increase in the Numbers of Mankind, Being an Answer to Mr. Malthus’s Essay on That Subject. London: Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, and Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011a. The Letters of William Godwin: 1778–1797. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011b. The Letters of William Godwin: 1798–1805. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Enquiry Concerning Political Justice: And its Influence on Morals and Happiness. London: Penguin UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, Charlotte. 2016. Romantic Outlaws: The Extraordinary Lives of Mary Wollstonecraft & Mary Shelley. London: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, Alexander, James Madison, and John Jay. 1961. The Federalist Papers. Washington: New American Library.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hay, Daisy. 2022. Dinner with Joseph Johnson: Books and Friendship in a Revolutionary Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hellum, Anne, and Henriette Sinding Aasen. 2013. Women’s Human Rights: CEDAW in International, Regional and National Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, Thomas. 1996. Hobbes: Leviathan: Revised. Student. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. 1991. Kant: Political Writings. Ed. Hans Reiss. Trans. H. B. Nisbet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malthus, Thomas Robert. 1999. An Essay on the Principle of Population. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milton, John. 2003. Paradise Lost. London: Penguin Books Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford English Dictionary Online. Panopticon, n. Accessed August 31, 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paley, Morton D., and Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley. 2014. The Last Man. World’s Classics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul. n.d. 1 Corinthians 13: 6–8. https://www.biblegateway.com/

  • Petersen, William. 1971. The Malthus-Godwin Debate, Then and Now. Demography 8 (1): 13–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, Michael. 2021. Bentham. London: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semple, Janet. 1993. Bentham’s Prison: A Study of the Panopticon Penitentiary: A Study of the Panopticon Penitentiary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shelley, Mary. 2016. Frankenstein (Second International Student Edition) (Norton Critical Editions). New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelley, Mary Wollstonecraft. 1980a. The Letters of Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley: “A Part of the Elect.” Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelley, Mary Wollstonecraft. 1980b. The Letters of Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley: “Treading in Unknown Paths.” Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1987. The Journals of Mary Shelley, 1814–1844. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, Janet. 2013. Death and the Maidens: Fanny Wollstonecraft and the Shelley Circle. London: A&C Black.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vijeyarasa, Ramona. 2021. International Women’s Rights Law and Gender Equality: Making the Law Work for Women. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • William Godwin’s Diary. http://godwindiary.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/. Accessed August 31, 2022.

  • Williford, Miriam. 1975. Bentham on the Rights of Women. Journal of the History of Ideas 36 (1): 167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wollstonecraft, Mary. 1787. Thoughts on the Education of Daughters: With Reflections on Female Conduct, in the More Important Duties of Life. London: J. Johnson.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1788. Mary, a Fiction. London: J. Johnson.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1994. Maria, Or, The Wrongs of Woman. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. The Collected Letters of Mary Wollstonecraft. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. Letters Written in Sweden, Norway, and Denmark. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. A Vindication of the Rights of Woman. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eileen M. Hunt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hunt, E.M. (2024). Women’s Misery and Women’s Rights in International Law and Literature: Wollstonecraft, Malthus, Bentham, and Shelley. In: Bourcier, B., Jakonen, M. (eds) British Modern International Thought in the Making. International Political Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45713-5_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics