Skip to main content
Log in

Drug Proscriptions as Proxy Crimes

  • Published:
Law and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our drug policy has been widely deemed a failure because the criminalization of drug use has not succeeded in reducing prevalence rates. I contend that the most promising basis to defend the justifiability of drug offenses is to construe them as proxy crimes: offenses designed to prevent the commission of other, more serious crimes. I make a case that many law enforcement officials use drug proscriptions for this purpose in the real world. When construed as proxy crimes, drug prohibitions are less vulnerable to some of the familiar objections brought against their legitimacy. Nonetheless, the justification for punishing those who violate drug proscriptions remains unpersuasive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Douglas Husak.

Additional information

Distinguished Professor of Philosophy, Rutgers University. Thanks to assistance from audiences at Bowling Green State University, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, and Oxford University, U.K.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Husak, D. Drug Proscriptions as Proxy Crimes. Law and Philos 36, 345–366 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-017-9289-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-017-9289-1

Navigation