Erratum
After publication of the article [1], it has been brought to our attention that the wrong title was used on initial publication. The correct title of this article is “The Liverpool Care Pathway: discarded in cancer patients but good enough for dying nursing home patients? A systematic review”. The original version of the article has been updated to reflect this.
Reference
Husebo B, Flo E, Engedal K. The Liverpool Care Pathway: a systematic review discarded in cancer patients but good enough for dying nursing home patients? BMC Medical Ethics. 2017;18:1. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0205-x.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1186/s12910-017-0205-x
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
About this article
Cite this article
Husebo, B.S., Flo, E. & Engedal, K. Erratum to: The Liverpool Care Pathway: discarded in cancer patients but good enough for dying nursing home patients? A systematic review. BMC Med Ethics 18, 52 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0211-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0211-z