Notes
The question is much more complicated, and of course Kant’s later account of indigenous ways of life and his related theory of political legitimacy is very different from that of Locke. For a discussion that traces this development and illustrates Kant’s early theory of germs and dispositions as it relates to the genesis of human races (see Ypi, 2014).
References
Acharya, A. and Buzan, B. (eds.) (2010) Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives On and Beyond Asia. London: Routledge.
Alexandrowicz, C. (1967) Introduction to the History of the Law of Nations in the East Indies. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Ansary, M.T. (2012) Games without Rules: The Often Interrupted History of Afghanistan. New York: Public Affairs.
Armitage, D. (2000) The Ideological Origins of the British Empire. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Armitage, D. (2007) The Declaration of Independence: A Global History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Armitage, D. (2013) Foundations of Modern International Thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Armitage, D. (forthcoming) Modern international thought: Problems and prospects. History of European Ideas, 41, in press.
Armitage, D., Bol, P., Ge, Z., Jenco, L., Murthy, V. and Sun, L. (2013) Critical forum: The international turn in intellectual history. Intellectual History (Taipei) 1: 213–416.
Barfield, T.J. (2010) Afghanistan: A Cultural and Political History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Bartelson, J. (2009) Visions of World Community. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Becker Lorca, A. (forthcoming) Mestizo International Law: A Global Intellectual History. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Boucher, D. (1998) Political Theories of International Relations: Thucydides to the Present. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bourke, R. (forthcoming) Empire and Revolution: The Political Life of Edmund Burke. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Brundage, J. (1998) The Medieval Origins of the Legal Profession: Canonists, Civilians and Courts. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Butler, G.G. and Maccoby, S. (1928) The Development of International Law. London: Longman, Green & Company.
Corcoran, S. (1997) Does a corporation have a sex? In: N. Naffine and R.J. Owens (eds.) Sexing the Subject of Law. North Ryde, NSW: LBC Information Services, pp. 215–232.
Devetak, R. (forthcoming) Historiographical foundations of modern international thought: Histories of the European states-system from Florence to Göttingen. History of European Ideas, 41, in press.
Elden, S. (2013) The Birth of Territory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Fitzmaurice, A. (2014) Property, Sovereignty and Empire, 1500–1800. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Freud, S. (1989) Civilization and Its Discontents, Translated by J. Strachey. New York: W. W. Norton.
Ghosh, D. (2012) Another set of imperial turns? American Historical Review 117 (3): 772–793.
Hafner-Burton, E., Victor, D.G. and Lupu, Y. (2012) Political science research on international law: The state of the field. The American Journal of International Law 106 (1): 47–97.
Hobson, J. (2012) The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics: Western International Theory, 1760–2010. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Jahn, B. (2010) Review of Ian Hall and Lisa Hill (eds.), British international thinkers from Hobbes to Namier (2009). International Affairs 86 (6): 1411–1412.
Kayaoğlu, T. (2010) Legal Imperialism: Sovereignty and Extraterritoriality in Japan, the Ottoman Empire and China. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Kazmi, Z. (2012) Polite Anarchy in International Relations Theory. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kazmi, Z. (2014) Contesting the state of nature: Anarchism and international relations. In: C. Levy and S. Newman (eds.) The Anarchist Imagination: Anarchism Encounters the Humanities and the Social Sciences. London: Psychology Press.
Keene, E. (2005) International Political Thought. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
Kinsella, H. (2011) The Image before the Weapon: A Critical History of the Distinction between Combatant and Civilian. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Koskenniemi, M. (2002) The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law, 1870–1960. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Koskenniemi, M. (2002) The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law, 1890–1960. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Maier, C.S. (2014) Leviathan 2.0: Inventing Modern Statehood. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Meinecke, F. (1984) Machiavellism: The Doctrine of Raison d’Etat and its Place in History. Translated by D. Scott. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Moyn, S. and Sartori, A. (eds.) (2013) Global Intellectual History. New York: Columbia University Press.
Muthu, S. (ed.) (2013) Empire and Modern Political Thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Onuma, Y. (2010) A Transcivilizational Perspective on International Law. Leiden, the Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
Porter, B. (1978) Patterns of thought and practice: Martin Wight’s ‘international theory’. In: M. Donelan (ed.) The Reason of States: A Study in International Political Theory. London: Allen & Unwin, pp. 64–74.
Prichard, A. (2013) Justice, Order and Anarchy: The International Political Theory of Pierre-Joseph Proudhon. London: Routledge.
Prokhovnik, R. and Slomp, G. (2011) International Political Theory after Hobbes: Analysis, Interpretation and Orientation. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Rothschild, E. (2005) Language and Empire, c. 1800. Historical Research 76 (200): 208–229.
Simons, P. (2003) The emergence of the idea of the individualized state in the international legal system. Journal of the History of International Law 5 (1): 293–335.
Sluga, G. (2013) Internationalism in the Age of Nationalism. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Stern, P. and Wennerlind, C. (eds.) (2014) Mercantilism Reimagined: Political Economy in Early Modern Britain and its Empire. New York: Oxford University Press.
Strong, T.B. (2012) Politics Without Vision: Thinking Without a Banister in the Twentieth Century. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Thompson, K.W. (1994) Fathers of International Thought: The Legacy of Political Theory. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press.
Toscano, M. (1966) The History of Treaties and International Politics. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.
Tuck, R. (1999) The Rights of War and Peace: Political Thought and International Order from Grotius to Kant. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Tully, J. (2008) Public Philosophy in a New Key, 2 vols. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Waltz, K. and Fearon, J. (2012) A conversation with Kenneth Waltz. Annual Review of Political Science 15 (1): 1–12.
Wight, M. (1960) Why is there no international theory? International Relations 2 (1): 35–48, 62.
Wight, M. (1991) International Theory: The Three Traditions. Leicester, UK: Leicester University Press.
Wolfson, M. (2013) The origins of globalisation. Prospect Blog, http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/blog/david-armitage-foundations-of-modern-international-thought-review/#.UZJehLG9KSM, accessed 14 May 2013.
Ypi, L. (2014) Commerce and colonialism in Kant’s philosophy of nature and history. In: K. Flikschuh and L. Ypi (eds.) Kant and Colonialism: Historical and Critical Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hutchings, K., Bartelson, J., Keene, E. et al. Foundations of modern international theory. Contemp Polit Theory 13, 387–418 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/cpt.2014.23
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/cpt.2014.23