Skip to main content
Log in

Foundations of modern international theory

  • Critical Exchange
  • Published:
Contemporary Political Theory Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. The question is much more complicated, and of course Kant’s later account of indigenous ways of life and his related theory of political legitimacy is very different from that of Locke. For a discussion that traces this development and illustrates Kant’s early theory of germs and dispositions as it relates to the genesis of human races (see Ypi, 2014).

References

  • Acharya, A. and Buzan, B. (eds.) (2010) Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives On and Beyond Asia. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexandrowicz, C. (1967) Introduction to the History of the Law of Nations in the East Indies. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansary, M.T. (2012) Games without Rules: The Often Interrupted History of Afghanistan. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, D. (2000) The Ideological Origins of the British Empire. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, D. (2007) The Declaration of Independence: A Global History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, D. (2013) Foundations of Modern International Thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, D. (forthcoming) Modern international thought: Problems and prospects. History of European Ideas, 41, in press.

  • Armitage, D., Bol, P., Ge, Z., Jenco, L., Murthy, V. and Sun, L. (2013) Critical forum: The international turn in intellectual history. Intellectual History (Taipei) 1: 213–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barfield, T.J. (2010) Afghanistan: A Cultural and Political History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bartelson, J. (2009) Visions of World Community. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Becker Lorca, A. (forthcoming) Mestizo International Law: A Global Intellectual History. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

  • Boucher, D. (1998) Political Theories of International Relations: Thucydides to the Present. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourke, R. (forthcoming) Empire and Revolution: The Political Life of Edmund Burke. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  • Brundage, J. (1998) The Medieval Origins of the Legal Profession: Canonists, Civilians and Courts. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, G.G. and Maccoby, S. (1928) The Development of International Law. London: Longman, Green & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corcoran, S. (1997) Does a corporation have a sex? In: N. Naffine and R.J. Owens (eds.) Sexing the Subject of Law. North Ryde, NSW: LBC Information Services, pp. 215–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devetak, R. (forthcoming) Historiographical foundations of modern international thought: Histories of the European states-system from Florence to Göttingen. History of European Ideas, 41, in press.

  • Elden, S. (2013) The Birth of Territory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzmaurice, A. (2014) Property, Sovereignty and Empire, 1500–1800. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1989) Civilization and Its Discontents, Translated by J. Strachey. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, D. (2012) Another set of imperial turns? American Historical Review 117 (3): 772–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hafner-Burton, E., Victor, D.G. and Lupu, Y. (2012) Political science research on international law: The state of the field. The American Journal of International Law 106 (1): 47–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, J. (2012) The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics: Western International Theory, 1760–2010. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jahn, B. (2010) Review of Ian Hall and Lisa Hill (eds.), British international thinkers from Hobbes to Namier (2009). International Affairs 86 (6): 1411–1412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayaoğlu, T. (2010) Legal Imperialism: Sovereignty and Extraterritoriality in Japan, the Ottoman Empire and China. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazmi, Z. (2012) Polite Anarchy in International Relations Theory. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kazmi, Z. (2014) Contesting the state of nature: Anarchism and international relations. In: C. Levy and S. Newman (eds.) The Anarchist Imagination: Anarchism Encounters the Humanities and the Social Sciences. London: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keene, E. (2005) International Political Thought. Cambridge, UK: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsella, H. (2011) The Image before the Weapon: A Critical History of the Distinction between Combatant and Civilian. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Koskenniemi, M. (2002) The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law, 1870–1960. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koskenniemi, M. (2002) The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law, 1890–1960. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier, C.S. (2014) Leviathan 2.0: Inventing Modern Statehood. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinecke, F. (1984) Machiavellism: The Doctrine of Raison d’Etat and its Place in History. Translated by D. Scott. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyn, S. and Sartori, A. (eds.) (2013) Global Intellectual History. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Muthu, S. (ed.) (2013) Empire and Modern Political Thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onuma, Y. (2010) A Transcivilizational Perspective on International Law. Leiden, the Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, B. (1978) Patterns of thought and practice: Martin Wight’s ‘international theory’. In: M. Donelan (ed.) The Reason of States: A Study in International Political Theory. London: Allen & Unwin, pp. 64–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prichard, A. (2013) Justice, Order and Anarchy: The International Political Theory of Pierre-Joseph Proudhon. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prokhovnik, R. and Slomp, G. (2011) International Political Theory after Hobbes: Analysis, Interpretation and Orientation. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, E. (2005) Language and Empire, c. 1800. Historical Research 76 (200): 208–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, P. (2003) The emergence of the idea of the individualized state in the international legal system. Journal of the History of International Law 5 (1): 293–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sluga, G. (2013) Internationalism in the Age of Nationalism. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P. and Wennerlind, C. (eds.) (2014) Mercantilism Reimagined: Political Economy in Early Modern Britain and its Empire. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong, T.B. (2012) Politics Without Vision: Thinking Without a Banister in the Twentieth Century. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, K.W. (1994) Fathers of International Thought: The Legacy of Political Theory. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toscano, M. (1966) The History of Treaties and International Politics. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuck, R. (1999) The Rights of War and Peace: Political Thought and International Order from Grotius to Kant. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tully, J. (2008) Public Philosophy in a New Key, 2 vols. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, K. and Fearon, J. (2012) A conversation with Kenneth Waltz. Annual Review of Political Science 15 (1): 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wight, M. (1960) Why is there no international theory? International Relations 2 (1): 35–48, 62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wight, M. (1991) International Theory: The Three Traditions. Leicester, UK: Leicester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfson, M. (2013) The origins of globalisation. Prospect Blog, http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/blog/david-armitage-foundations-of-modern-international-thought-review/#.UZJehLG9KSM, accessed 14 May 2013.

  • Ypi, L. (2014) Commerce and colonialism in Kant’s philosophy of nature and history. In: K. Flikschuh and L. Ypi (eds.) Kant and Colonialism: Historical and Critical Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hutchings, K., Bartelson, J., Keene, E. et al. Foundations of modern international theory. Contemp Polit Theory 13, 387–418 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/cpt.2014.23

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/cpt.2014.23

Navigation