Abstract
The paper concludes the argument that certain aesthetic objects conduce to a feeling of radical contingency, and to an openness to St Thomas's Third Way proof for the existence of God. Much is conceded to the late Mr Gershon Weiler's criticism of an earlier discussion. The upshot is (a) that Necessary Being as converse of radical contingency may be an Aesthetic Idea/Sublime of Kant's kind, and (b) that without the ‘I AM that I am’, it is empty. The ‘inference’ from radical contingency to Necessary Being may function as George Eliot thought Wit to function, intellectually/aesthetically.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
What is terrifying is that it happens that will not happen, that it will stop happening. J.-F. Lyotard
I AM that I am.Genesis, Ch.3, Verse 14.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hutchings, P. Natural theology: Wit, the electric shock, the aesthetic idea—and a belated acknowledgment of points made by the late MR gershon weiler. SOPHIA 42, 9–26 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02824838
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02824838