Skip to main content
Log in

On group lies and lying to oneself: comment on Jennifer Lackey’s The Epistemology of Groups

  • Book Symposium
  • Published:
Asian Journal of Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In The Epistemology of Groups, Jennifer Lackey investigates the conditions for the possibility of groups telling lies. Central to this project is the goal of holding groups, and individuals within groups, accountable for their actions. I show that Lackey’s total account of group phenomena, however, may open up a means by which groups can evade accusations of having lied, thus allowing them to evade responsibility in precisely the way Lackey set out to avoid. Along the way, I also take note of some interesting implications of Lackey’s view: that it makes groups uniquely susceptible to a lack of self-knowledge and that it creates an interesting mechanism by which groups can lie to themselves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. I am skipping over some important details here: insofar as members of the group may not even think of groups as the sorts of things that have beliefs, it may be false, read de dicto, that they, and therefore the group, have any beliefs about the group’s beliefs at all. It would already be a notable consequence of Lackey’s view if groups systematically failed to have beliefs about their own beliefs in this way. But I am assuming here that some sort of de re reading of group belief statements will suffice to allow Lackey’s view to generate affirmative conclusions about reflexive higher-order group beliefs.

References

  • Bratman, M. E. (1993). Shared intention. Ethics, 104(1), 97–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. (1982). The varieties of reference. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, M. (1989). Social facts. Princeton University Press.

  • Huebner, B. (2014). Macrocognition: A theory of distributed minds and collective intentionality. Oxford University Press.

  • Lackey, J. (2021). The epistemology of groups. Oxford University Press.

  • List, C., & Pettit, P. (2011). Group agency: The possibility, design, and status of corporate agents. Oxford University Press.

  • Pettit, P. (2003). Groups with minds of their own. In F. Schmitt (eds.), Socializing metaphysics, pp. 167–193. Rowman & Littlefield.

  • Tollefson, D. P. (2015). Groups as agents. Polity Press.

  • Tuomela, R. (1992). Group beliefs. Synthese, 91, 285–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Megan Hyska.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hyska, M. On group lies and lying to oneself: comment on Jennifer Lackey’s The Epistemology of Groups. AJPH 2, 73 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44204-023-00128-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44204-023-00128-5

Keywords

Navigation