Perspectives in Biology and Medicine

abstract:

For Americans with significant disability, decisions about where to live are common flashpoints for the dignity of risk principle. Typically, a health-care professional, like the person's primary care physician, argues that the person is unsafe living at home and therefore must enter a nursing home. However, most people—even with extensive activities of daily living support needs—want to remain home in their communities. The belief that nursing homes offer safer residential environments is unproven and highly suspect. Furthermore, removing people from their personal home comforts diminishes their quality of life. Nonetheless, despite the clear moral imperative of the dignity of risk principle, many factors in the United States impede people with significant disability from remaining at home. Ableist and stigmatized attitudes of physicians about quality of life among people with disability are potential contributors. Few people have adequate financial resources to afford the personal assistance services (PAS) they need for daily basic supports. Medicaid, the major public payor for PAS, is difficult to join, varies widely by state, and has long waiting lists for home and community-based services. These issues are explored using stories from the author's friend Michael, who has significant physical disability and lives home alone.