Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Militainment and mechatronics: Occultatio and the veil of science fiction cool in United States Air Force advertisements

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Ethics and Information Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In 2009, the United States Air Force aired a series of science fiction-themed recruitment commercials on network television and their official YouTube channel. In these advertisements, the superimposition of science fiction imagery over depictions of Air Force operations frames these missions as near-future sci-fi adventure, ironically summarized by the tagline: “It’s not science fiction. It’s what we do every day.” Focusing on an early advertisement for the Air Force’s Reaper unmanned aerial vehicle, this essay explores how themes essential to the science fiction genre play a role in influencing contemporary attitudes about autonomous and semi-autonomous robotic weapons, as well as the way in which the aesthetic and functional qualities of these advanced technologies are used to frame moral arguments about their use. As a reconfiguration of the near-future battleground in the guise of science fiction, the “Reaper” ad reveals the way in which science fiction has come to serve as a functional-aesthetic benchmark and cultural sounding board, against which “every day” technologies can be measured and claims about their value, ethos, and social appeal are made. This essay explores the ethical entanglements between science fiction film and video games, and military technology, and the complex role science fiction plays in influencing public attitudes towards military technologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aksoy, A., & Robins, K. (1992). Exterminating angels: Morality, violence and technology in the gulf war. In H. Mowlanda, G. Gerbner, & H. Schiller (Eds.), Triumph of the image: The media’s war in the persian gulf–a global Perspective (pp. 202–212). Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asimov, I. (1978). The machine and the robot. In P. Warrick, M. H. Greenberg, & J. Olander (Eds.), Science fiction: Contemporary mythology (pp. 244–254). New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudrillard, J. (1995). The gulf war did not take place (P. Patton, Trans.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beasley, M. F. (1973). It’s what you don’t say: Omissio in cicero’s speeches. Southern Speech Communication Journal, 39.1: 11–20. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bova, B. (1974). The role of science fiction. In R. Bretnor (Ed.), Science fiction today and tomorrow (pp. 3–16). New York, New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Directors.” MJZ. MJZ, n.d. Web. 12 June 2012. <http://www.mjz.com/>.

  • Hallin, D. C., & Gitlin, T. (1993). Agon and ritual: The gulf war as popular culture and as television drama. Political Communication, 10, 411–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halter, Ed. From sun Tzu to XBox: War and video games. New York, NY: Thunder’s Mouth, 2006. Print.

  • Hoffman, M. (2008, June 10). Why general schwartz was chosen. Air force times. Retrieved November 3, 2011, from http://www.airforcetimes.com/news/2008/06/gates_whyschwartz_061008 w/.

  • Hoffman, M. (2009, February 16). New reaper sensors offer a bigger picture. Air force times. Retrieved November 2, 2011, from http://www.airforcetimes.com/news/2009/02/airforce_WAAS_021609/.

  • “IT’S NOT SCIENCE FICTION.” GSD&M. GSD&M, n.d. Web. 12 June 2012. <http://www.gsdm.com/#/work.aspx?subsection=3&project=1>.

  • Kellner, D. (1992). The persian gulf TV war. Boulder: Westview. Print.

  • Kellner, D. (2004) “The persian gulf TV war revisited.” Reporting war: Journalism in wartime. Ed. S. Allan and B. Zelizer. New York: Routledge. 136–54. Print.

  • Lanham, R. A. (1991). A handlist of rhetorical terms: Second edition (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyle, A. (2010, July 15). Air Force’s ‘Technology Horizons’ makes science fiction a reality. Official site of the U.S. Air Force. Retrieved November 4, 2011, from http://www.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123213717.

  • McCloskey, M. (2009, October 27). The war room: Daily transition between battle, home takes a toll on drone operators. Stars and stripes. Retrieved February 26, 2011, from http://www.stripes.com/news/the-war-room-daily-transition-between-battle-home-takes-a-toll-on-drone-operators-1.95949.

  • Mumford, L. (1963). Technics and civilization. New York: Harcourt Brace & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schodt, F. L. (1990). Inside the robot Kingdom: Japan, Mechatronics, and the coming robotopia. Tokyo and New York: Kodansha International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smicker, J. (2010). “Future combat, combating futures: Temporalities of war video games and the performance of proleptic histories. Joystick soldiers: The politics of play in military video games. Ed. B. H. Nina, and M. T. Payne. New York: Routledge. 106–21. Print.

  • Springer, C. (1996). Electronic eros: Bodies and desire in the postindustrial age. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, R. (2006). Have you played the war on terror? Critical Studies in Media Communication, 23(2), 112–130.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, R. (2009). Militainment, Inc: War, media, and popular culture. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, R. (Writer). (2007). Militainment, Inc.: Militarism & Pop Culture [DVD]. In R. Stahl (Producer): Media Education Foundation.

  • Telotte, J. P. (1995). Replications: A robotic history of the science fiction film. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toffler, A. (1970) Future shock. New York: Random House Print.

  • Toffler, A., & Toffler, H. (1993). War and anti-war. New York: Warner. Print.

  • United States Air Force. (2009, June 29). New air force Ad [Video file]. YouTube. Retrieved November 8, 2009, from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fiB3vrhPDN.

  • “USAF—”Plane”—GSD&M Idea City.” AdForum.com. MAYDREAM, INC., n.d. Web. 20 June 2012. <http://www.adforum.com/creative-work/ad/player/37296/sxi:1163649>.

  • “US AIR FORCE: UAS.” MassMarket. MassMarket, n.d. Web. 12 June 2012. <http://www.massmarket.tv/work/all/us-air-force-campaign/uas/>.

  • Warrick, P. (1978a). Introduction. In P. Warrick, M. H. Greenberg & J. Olander (Eds.), Science fiction: Contemporary mythology (pp. xv–xviii). New York: Harper & Row.

  • Warrick, P. (1978b). Science fiction myths and their ambiguity. In P. Warrick, M. H. Greenberg, & J. Olander (Eds.), Science fiction: Contemporary mythology (pp. 1–9). New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Communication, University of Pittsburgh, 1117 Cathedral of Learning, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA

    Nicholas R. Maradin III

Authors
  1. Nicholas R. Maradin III
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas R. Maradin III.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maradin, N.R. Militainment and mechatronics: Occultatio and the veil of science fiction cool in United States Air Force advertisements. Ethics Inf Technol 15, 77–86 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-013-9316-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-013-9316-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation