Skip to main content
Log in

Defining Trust as Action: An Example from Hungary

  • Published:
Philosophy of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper begins with the account of a focus group discussion of Hungarian female managers who demonstrated high level of trust. Drawing on the discussion the author explores the nature of trust and looks at works and research findings in different disciplines. In psychology Erikson’s findings on human growth and development are discussed. Representatives of Eastern and Western philosophy are quoted to highlight the underlying differences of thinking in relation to trust. The impact of cultural heritage and the influence of the environment on trust add further dimensions to the argument. In conclusion it is suggested that management education could be a platform for further research and exploration of trust in individuals and organisations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pfeffer, J Human Equation, McGraw-Hill 1998 p 180

  2. Six, F Trust and Trouble. Building Interpersonal Trust within Organisations Erasmus Research Institute of Management 2004; Lindenberg, S It takes both Trust and lack of Mistrust: the workings of cooperation and relation signalling ‘in: B Nooteboom and F E Six (eds) The Trust process, empirical studies of the determinants and the process of trust development Cheltenham: Edward Elgar 2000 pp 37–57

  3. Platts, M J Meaningful Manufacturing William Sessions Limited, York England 2003

  4. Bibó, I Elit és Szociális Érzék MagvetQ 1986

  5. Hankiss, E Proletár Reneszánsz Helikon 1999

  6. Hamvas, B Az Öt Génius Medio Kiadó 2000

  7. This suggests that an interesting study might reveal some differences between the level of trust of Hungarian and British men.

  8. The quote in the original Hungarian: ‘A nQk is állandóan kereskednek de Qk nem áruval hanem értékekkel kereskednek”.

  9. Rosener, J B ‘Ways Women Lead’ Harvard Business Review November–December 1990

  10. Collins, J Good to Great Random House Business Books 2001. Collins talks about ‘Level 5 leaders’ who can turn a good company into a great company.

  11. Mireisz, L A Magyar vallas ( Hungarian Religion) Paradigma Konyvek, Budapest 2004

  12. Szent Istvan Kiraly Intelmei es Torvenyei (Lessons and Laws of Saint Stephen) Szent Istvan Tarsulat, Budapest 2003

  13. Sas, J NQies NQk, Férfias Férfiak MagvetQ Kiadó 1998

  14. Praznovszky, M Királylányok, Múzsák, Hitvesek: NQi sorsok a magyar históriában Veszprém Könyvtár Kiadó 2004

  15. Jones, K ‘Trust’ in the Routledge Encyclopaedia of Philosophy Routledge 1998

  16. Jones, K ibid 1998

  17. Baier, A C Moral Prejudices, Essays on Ethics Harvard University Press 1994

  18. See Schelling, T Micromotives and Marcrobehaviour New York, Norton 1978 for a study of such self-fulfilling beliefs about how others will behave.

  19. Hirschman, A Against Parsimony: Three Easy Ways of Complicating Some Categories of Economic Discourse American Economic Review Proceedings 74, 1984 pp 88–96

  20. Ibid p 63

  21. Waley, A The Analects of Confucius III.7 Unwin Hyman 1988 p7

  22. Platts, M J ‘Confucius on Leadership’ Journal of Strategic Change 3,(5) 1994 pp 249–260

  23. Ibid p 251

  24. Plato The Republic Penguin Classics 2003 p 53

  25. Gibbon, E The Portable Gibbon: The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire (1776–1788) Harmondsworth: Penguin 1977 p 1

  26. Dennis, N and Erdos, G Cultures and Crimes Civitas 2004

  27. Machiavelli, quoted in Onora O’Neill at Reith Lectures htpp://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/reith2002

  28. Onora O’Neill at Reith Lectures htpp://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/reith2002

  29. Erikson, E H Childhood and Society Vintage 1963; Erikson, E H Childhood and Society Paladin 1977; Erikson, E H Identity Youth and Crisis W W Norton and Company Ltd 1968

  30. Erikson, E H Insight and Responsibility W W Norton and Company Ltd 1964

  31. Erikson op cit 1964

  32. Erikson op cit 1964

  33. Compare the following, for example: ‘Each individual, to become a mature adult, must to a sufficient degree develop all the ego qualities mentioned, so that a wise Indian, a true gentleman, and a mature peasant share and recognize in one another the final stage of integrity. But each cultural entity, to develop the particular style of integrity suggested by its historical place, utilizes a particular combination of these conflicts, along with specific provocations and prohibitions of infantile sexuality. Infantile conflicts become creative only if sustained by the firm support of cultural institutions and of the special leader-classes representing them. In order to approach or experience integrity, the individual must know how to be a follower of image bearers in religion and in politics, in the economic order and in technology, in aristocratic living and in the arts and sciences. Ego integrity, therefore, implies an emotional integration which permits participation by followership as well as acceptance of the responsibility of leadership.’ Erikson, E H Childhood and Society, Paladin 1977 p 242. A mature civilised level of development means ‘the fully adult relationships between emotional equals, characterised by mutuality, spontaneity, co-operation, preservation of individuality and valuable differences, and by stability. The relationship is irreversible and stable, having no motive for change. Its morality is implicit, not imposed, a natural acceptance of obligations to other people. The relationship of mature dependence is equal partnership and friendship: love that is capacity to give to another a relationship in which his personality can flourish’. Klein, J Our Needs for Others and its roots in infancy, Brunner-Routledge 2002 p 422. According to Csikszentmihalyi the total fulfilment of one’s potentialities, which usually generates happiness, depends on the simultaneous presence of two processes. ‘The first is the process of differentiation, which involves realizing that we are unique individuals, responsible for our own survival and well-being, who are willing to develop this uniqueness wherever it leads, while enjoying the expression of our being in action. The second process involves integration, or the realization that however unique we are, we are also completely enmeshed in networks of relationships with other human beings, with cultural symbols and artefacts, and with the surrounding natural environment. A person who is fully differentiated and integrated becomes a complex individual — one who has the best chance at leading a happy, vital, and meaningful life.’ Csikszentmihalyi, M Good Business, Leadership, Flow and the Making of Meaning Hodder & Stoughton 2003 pp 28–29. Finally, Platts talks about the importance of intent and talks about the four different worlds that we need to be able to integrate to be fully grown and psychologically and spiritually mature. ‘They are in ascending order, the world of action, the world of forms (thoughts, ideas, plans), the world of fundamental principles which lie behind things and have to be correctly understood and manifested in plans and in actions if those plans and actions are to work, and the final ‘world’ of emanation — the level from which the spark comes that drives a vision. Platts, M J Meaningful Manufacturing William Sessions Limited, York, England 2003 pp113-114.

  34. Baier, A Moral Prejudices, Essays on Ethics Harvard University Press 1994 p x

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Illes, K. Defining Trust as Action: An Example from Hungary. Philos. of Manag. 7, 69–80 (2009). https://doi.org/10.5840/pom20097323

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/pom20097323

Keywords

Navigation