Abstract
Building on the modified theory of planned behavior (TPB), this study examined the underlying psychological motives for academic dishonesty in a sample of 250 undergraduates drawn from three selected Malaysian public universities. The results yielded additional supports for usefulness of modified TPB model in predicting academic misconduct. All components of the model exerted statistically significant effects on intention towards academic misconduct, and intention itself exerted a statistically significant impact on academic dishonesty. This suggests that students’ academic misconducts could be addressed effectively if proper attention is given to the underpinning factors. Further, the findings revealed that the hypothesized relationships among variables of the modified model were all statistically significant. The uniqueness of this study lies in the large amount of variance (69 % and 75 %) explained by components of the model (in the prediction of intention and academic dishonesty respectively). These variances have rarely been accounted for in the previous studies. Implications of the findings are discussed and suggestions advanced for future studies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211. people.umass.edu/psyc661/pdf/tpb.obhdp.pdf. Accessed March 10 2012.
Ajzen, I. (2002). Attitudes, personality, and behavior. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Aluede, O., Omoregie, E. O., & Osa-Edoh, G. I. (2006). Academic dishonesty as a contemporary problem in higher education: how academic advisors can help. Reading Improvement, 43(2), 97–106.
Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behavior: a meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 471–499.
Baird, J., Jr. (1980). Current trends in college cheating. Psychology in the School, 17, 515–522.
Beck, L., & Ajzen, I. (1991). Predicting dishonest actions using the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 25, 285–301.
Bertram Gallant, T., & Drinan, P. (2006). Organizational theory and student cheating: explanation, responses, and strategies. Journal of Higher Education, 77(5), 839–861.
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
Bowers, W. J. (1964). Student dishonesty and its control in college. New York: Bureau of Applied Social Research, Columbia University.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park: Sage.
Bunn, D. N., Caudill, S. B., & Gropper, D. M. (1992). Crime in the classroom: an economic analysis of undergraduate student cheating behavior. The Journal of Economic Education, 23(3), 197–207.
Byrne, M. B. (2010). Structural equation modeling with Amos: Basic concepts, application, and programming (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle Creek: Pearson Education.
Crown, D. F., & Spiller, S. M. (1998). Learning from the literature on collegiate cheating: a review of empirical research. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 683–700.
Davis, S. F., Drinan, P. F., & Tricia-Bertram, G. (2010). Cheating in school: What we know and what we can do A Book Review. Taylor & Francis Group: The Clearing House, 83, LLC ISSN: 0009–8655 print. DOI: 10.1080/00098651003785337 pp. 150–152.
Dawkins, R. L. (2004). Attributes and statuses of college students associated with classroom cheating on a small-sized campus. College Student Journal, 38(1), 116–129.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Harding, T. S., Carpenter, D. D., Finelli, C. J., & Passow, H. J. (2004). Does academic dishonesty relate to unethical behavior in professional practice? An exploratory study. Science and Engineering Ethics, 10, 311–324.
Harding, T. S., Mayhey, M. J., Finelli, C. J., & Carpenter, D. D. (2007). The theory of planned behavior as a model of academic dishonesty in engineering and humanities undergraduates. Ethics and Behavior, 17(3), 255–279. doi:10.1080/10508420701519239.
Harding, T. S., Carpenter, D. D., & Finelli, C. J. (2012). An exploratory investigation of the ethical behavior of engineering undergraduates. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(2), 346–374.
Hutton, A. P. (2002). Understanding student cheating and what educators can do about it. College Teaching, 54(1).
Johns, S. K., & Strand, C. A. (2000). Survey results of the ethical beliefs of business students. The Journal of Education for Business, 75(6), 315–320.
Josephson Institute of Ethics (2004, Report Card). The ethics of American youth. http://www.josephsoninstitute.org/Survey2004/2004reportcard_pressrelease.htm. Accessed February 13 2011.
Kelly, A. M., Gutmann, M. E., Schneiderman, E., DeWald, J. P., McCann, A., & Campbell, P. R. (2008). The prevalence of academic dishonesty in Texas Dental Hygiene Programs. Journal of Dental Education, 72(11), 1247–1260.
Kibler, W. L., NUSS, E. M., Paterson, B. G., & Pavela, G. (1988). Academic integrity and student deuelopment: Legal issues and policy perspectiues. Asheville, NC: College Administration Publications.
Kidwell, L. A., Wozniak, K., & Laurel, J. P. (2003). Student reports and faculty perceptions of academic dishonesty. Teaching Business Ethics, 7, 205–214.
Kirkland, K. D. (2009). Academic honesty: Is what students believe different from what they do? A dissertation submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Education.
Kisamore, J. L., Stone, T. H., & Jawahar, I. M. (2007). Academic integrity: individual and situational factors on academic conduct contemplation. Journal of Business Ethics, 75, 381–394.
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.
Lambert, E. G., Hogan, N. L., & Barton, S. M. (2003). Collegiate academic dishonesty revisited: what have they done, how often have they done it, who does it, and why did they do it? Electronic Journal of Sociology, 1–28. ISSN: 1198 3655.
Levy, E. S., & Rakovski, C. C. (2006). Academic dishonesty: a zero tolerance professor and student registration choices. Research in Higher Education, 47(6), 735–755. doi:10.1007/s11162-006-9013-8.
Mayhew, M. J., Hubbard, S. M., Finelli, C. J., Harding, T. S., & Carpenter, D. D. (2009). Using structural equation modeling to validate the theory of planned behavior as a model for predicting student cheating. The Review of Higher Education, 32(4), 441–468.
McCabe, D. L. (1992). The influence of situational ethics on cheating among college students. Sociological Inquiry, 62, 365–374. doi:10.1111/j.1475-682X.1992.tb00287.x.
McCabe, D. L. (1993). Faculty responses to academic dishonesty: the influence of student honor codes. Research in Higher Education, 34, 367–658.
McCabe, D. L. (2001). Cheating: why students do it and how we can help them stop. American Educator Winter, 38–43.
McCabe, D. L. (2005). It takes a village: academic dishonesty and educational opportunity. Liberal Education, 91(3), 26–31.
McCabe, D. L., & Bowers, W. J. (1996). The relationship between student cheating and college fraternity or sorority membership. NASPA Journal, 33, 280–291.
McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1993). Academic dishonesty: honor codes and other contextual influences. Journal of Higher Education, 64, 520–538.
McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1996). What we know about cheating in college. Change, 28(1), 28–33.
McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1997). Individual and contextual influences on academic dishonesty: a multicampus investigation. Research in Higher Education, 38(3), 379–397.
McCabe, D. L., Trevino, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (1999). Academic integrity in honor code and non-honor code environments. Journal of Higher Education, 70(2), 211–234.
McCabe, D. L., Trevino, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2001). Cheating in academic institutions: a decade research. Ethics & Behavior, 11(3), 219–232.
McCabe, D. L., Trevino, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2002). Honor codes and other contextual influences on academic integrity: a replication and extension to modified honor code settings. Research in Higher Education, 43(3), 357–379.
McShane, S., & Von Glinow, M. (2005). Organizational behavior: Emerging realities for the workplace revolution. New York: McGraw Hill.
Meade, J. (1992). Cheating is academic dishonesty par for the course. PRism, 1, 30–32.
Nadelson, S. (2007). Academic misconduct by university students: faculty perceptions and responses. Plagiary: Cross-Disciplinary Studies in Plagiarism, Fabrication, and Falsification, 2(2), 1–10. quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/p/pod/dod-idx? c=plag;idno=5240451. Accessed May 8 2011.
Newstead, S. E., Franklyn-Stokes, A., & Armstead, P. (1996). Individual differences in student cheating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 229–241.
Nuss, E. M. (1984). Academic integrity: comparing faculty and student attitudes. Improving College and University Teaching, 32(3), 140–144.
Odunayo, W., & Olujuwon, T. (2010). Corrupt practices and educational values attainment in Nigeria society. European Journal of Social Sciences, 16(1), 64–74.
Passow, H. J., Mayhew, M. J., Finelli, C. J., Harding, T. S., & Carpenter, D. D. (2006). Factors -influencing engineering students’ decision to cheat by type of assessment. Research in Higher Education, 47(6), 643–684.
Payne, S. L., & Nantz, K. S. (1994). Social accounts and metaphors about cheating. College Teaching, 42, 90.
Petress, K. C. (2003, Spring). Academic dishonesty: a plague on our profession. Education, 123(3), 624–627. http://writing.markfullmer.com/academic-dishonesty-plague-our-profession. Accessed March 5 2012.
Prenshaw, J. P., Straughan, D. R., & Albers-Miller, D. N. (2001). University academic dishonesty policy and student perceptions of cheating: an exploratory content analysis across fourteen universities. www.sbaer.uca.edu/research/acme/2001/45.pdf. Accessed May 8 2011.
Rakovski, C. C., & Levy, E. S. (2007). Academic dishonesty: perceptions of business students. College Student Journal, 41(2), 466–481.
Rawwas, M. Y. A., & Isakson, H. R. (2000). Ethics of tomorrow’s business managers: the influence of personal beliefs and values, individual characteristics, and situational factors. The Journal of Education for Business, 75(6), 321–330.
Rawwas, M. Y. A., Al-Khatib, J. A., & Vitell, S. J. (2004). Academic dishonesty: a cross-cultural comparison of U.S. and Chinese marketing students. Journal of Marketing Education, 26, 89–100.
Simon, A. C., Carr, R. J., McCullogh, M. S., Morgan, J. S., Oleson, T., & Ressel, M. (2004). Gender, student perceptions, institutional commitments and academic dishonesty: who report in academic dishonesty cases? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(1). http://dx.doi.org/04/010075-16
Stone, T. H., Kisamore, J. L., & Jawahar, I. M. (2007). Predicting academic dishonesty: Theory of planned behavior and personality. Ottawa: ASAC 2OO7.
Stone, T., Jawahar, I., & Kisamore, J. (2010). Predicting academic misconduct intentions and behavior using the theory of planned behavior and personality. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 32(1), 35–45. doi:10.1080./01973530903539895.
Stratton, W. E., Flynn, W. R., & Johnson, G. A. (1981). Moral development and decision making: A study of student ethics. In J. G. Longenecker, C. W. Moore, J. W. Petty, L. E. Palich, and J. A. McKinney (2005), Ethical attitudes in small businesses and large corporations: Theory and empirical findings from a tracking study spanning three decades (pp.10). Journal of Small Business Management, (Special Issue).
Swift, C. O., & Nonis, S. (1998). When no one is watching: cheating behaviors on projects and assignments. Marketing Education Review, 8, 27–36.
The Center for Academic Integrity (1999). The fundamental values of academic integrity. http:www.academicintegrity.org. Accessed August 20 2009.
Trevino, L. K., & Youngblood, S. A. (1990). Bad apples in bad barrels: a causal analysis of ethical decision-making behavior. In J. G. Longenecker, C. W. Moore, J. W. Petty, L. E. Palich, and J. A. McKinney (2005), Ethical attitudes in small businesses and large corporations: theory and empirical findings from a tracking study spanning three decades (pp.10). Journal of Small Business Management, (Special Issue).
Unal, E. (2011). Examining the relationship between pre-service teachers’ ethical reasoning levels and their academic dishonesty levels: a structural equation modeling approach. Educational Research and Reviews, 6(19), 983–992. doi:10.5897/ERR11.259.
Whitley, B. E. J. (1998). Factors associated with cheating among college students: a review. Research in Higher Education, 39, 235–274.
Whitley, B. E., Jr., & Keith-Spiegel, P. (2002). Academic dishonesty: An educator’s guide. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Wideman, M. A. (2008). Academic dishonesty in postsecondary education: a literature review. Teaching & Learning Journal, 2(1), 1–12.
Williams, M. S., & Hosek, W. R. (2003). Strategies for reducing academic dishonesty. Journal of Legal Studies Education, 21, 87.
Acknowledgments
Special appreciations go to Prof. Dr. Mohamad Sahari Nordin, former Dean, Research and Management Center, International Islamic University Malaysia, for his relentless guidance and supports in the process of this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
APPENDIX
APPENDIX
COMPLETE ITEMS OF THE MODIFIED INSTRUMENT
-
a.
PACES-2 (The Perceptions and Attitudes toward Cheating among Engineering Students Survey, version 2, adapted from Harding et al. 2007)
Instruction: Please indicate your level of agreement or disagreement with the items listed below. Use the keys: 1 = Strongly Disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Less Disagree; 4 = Undecided; 5 = Less Agree; 6 = Agree; 7 = Strongly Agree
Intention (INT)
-
1.
I will cheat on an in-class test or exam during the current academic term.
-
2.
I intend to cheat on an in-class test or exam during the academic term.
-
3.
If I had the opportunity, I would cheat on an in-class test or exam during the current academic term.
-
4.
I will allow my friends to copy my academic works before submitting to the professor.
-
5.
I will turn in a paper purchased online for professor’s assignment during the current academic term.
-
6.
I intend to collaborate with friends to solve some of my take-home assignments.
-
7.
I intend to engage expert to write some of my academic works during the current academic term.
Perceived Behavioral Control (PBC)
-
1.
I believe I would have a great deal of control over whether I get caught attempting to cheat on a class test/exam.
-
2.
I believe that I have the skills required to cheat successfully during a class test or exam in all circumstances.
-
3.
It is mostly up to me whether or not I cheat successfully during a class test or exam.
-
4.
I will try to cheat if my friends cheat and escaped easily.
-
5.
I will NOT engage in cheating even if all other students are doing it.
Subjective Norms (S/Ns)
-
1.
If I cheated on a class test/exam, most people who are important to me (e.g., parent, siblings, friends, peers, teachers, etc.) would approve of my behavior.
-
2.
The people in my life whose opinions I value (e.g., parent, siblings, friends, peers, teachers, etc.) would be willing to cheat on a class test/exam if they were in my situation.
-
3.
The people in my life whose opinions I value (e.g., parent, siblings, friends, peers, teachers, etc.) would NOT approve of my conduct if I cheated on a class test/exam.
-
4.
Most people who are important to me (e.g., parent, siblings, friends, peers, teachers, etc.) think I should NOT cheat on a class test/exam.
-
5.
People whose opinions I value (e.g., parent, siblings, friends, peers, teachers, etc.) expect me to cheat on a class test/exam.
-
6.
Most people who are important to me (e.g., parent, siblings, friends, peers, teachers, etc.) will look down on me if I cheat on a class test/exam.
-
7.
None of the people who are important to me (e.g., parent, siblings, friends, peers, teachers, etc.) thinks it is OK to cheat on a class test/exam.
-
1.
-
b.
Measure of Attitude Towards Behavior (adapted from Stone et al. 2007)
Instruction: Please indicate your level of agreement or disagreement with the items listed below. Use the keys: 1 = Strongly Agree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Less Disagree; 4 = Undecided; 5 = Less Agree; 6 = Agree; 7 = Strongly Agree
-
1.
It is necessary to report cheating by other students.
-
2.
It is always wrong to cheat.
-
3.
Students who cheat in college are likely to cheat on the future job.
-
4.
Cheating is necessary to level the playing field.
-
5.
It is good to report a friend caught cheating.
-
1.
-
c.
Measure of Academic Dishonesty (using Harding et al.’s 2007 approach)
Instruction: During the previous academic term in university, how frequently did you engage in the following conducts using the following scales, 1 = Never; 2 = Once or twice; 3 = Few times; 4 = Many times; 5 = Most of the times; 6 = Almost every time; and 7 = Every time:
-
1.
Cheating on a class test/exam
-
2.
Cheating on home assignments
-
3.
Unapproved collaboration on an assignment
-
4.
Writing a paper for another student
-
5.
Plagiarizing a paper using the internet
-
1.
-
d.
Measure of Ethical Belief (adapted from Kirkland 2009)
Instruction: What do you think or believe about the following statements? Use the keys: 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Agree, 4 = Strongly Agree and 5 = No Opinion:
-
1.
It is important for me to be a person with good character
-
2.
Most adults in my life consistently set a good example of ethics and character
-
3.
My parents/guardians always want me to do the ethically right thing, no matter the cost
-
4.
Being a person with good character is more important than being rich
-
5.
When it comes to doing what is right, I am better than most people I know
-
6.
In personal relationships, trust and honesty are essential
-
7.
I am satisfied with my own ethics and character
-
8.
In business and the workplace, trust and honesty are essential
-
9.
It’s important to me that people trust me
-
10.
People should play by the rules even if it means they lose
-
11.
It’s not cheating if everyone is doing it.
-
1.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Imran, A.M., Nordin, M.S. Predicting the Underlying Factors of Academic Dishonesty among Undergraduates in Public Universities: A Path Analysis Approach. J Acad Ethics 11, 103–120 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-013-9183-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-013-9183-x