The Role and Nature of Freedom in Two Normative Theories of Democracy
The article examines the role and the nature of freedom in two normative concepts of democracy, in the work of Hans Kelsen and of Emanuel Rádl. Both authors wrote their work on democracy between the two world wars. Kelsen formulated his concept of democracy in On the Substance and Value of Democracy (1920), a book which has clearly been influenced by the political thinking of Kant and Rousseau. Kelsen shares Rousseau's idea of general will and on this basis the principle of majority. Rádl outlines his theory of freedom and democracy in The War between the Czechs and the Germans (1928), Nationality as a Scientific Problem (1929) and On German Revolution (1933). Rádl distinguishes between three types of freedom and democracy: natural, majority and contractual. Rádl asserts that only in the third type of freedom, in which freedom is connected with responsibility and the law is freedom true. He considers the first type of freedom to be anarchical freedom, which can easily be misused. The second type of freedom is better than the first, but worse than the third. The author compares these concepts of freedom and democracy then and today and shows how they are linked to the questions of justice and solidarity at national and cosmopolitan levels.
References
Habermas, J. Drei normative Modelle der Demokratie in Die Einbeziehung des Anderen. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp, 1996.Search in Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. Allgemeine Theorie der Normen. Wien: Manz, 1979.Search in Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. Vom Wesen und Wert der Demokratie. Tübingen, 1920.Search in Google Scholar
Masaryk, T. G. Světová revoluce (The World Revolution). Praha, 1925.Search in Google Scholar
Philosophisches Wörterbuch. Stuttgart: Alfred Kroner Verlag, 1965.Search in Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. The Open Society and Its Enemies. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1971.Search in Google Scholar
Rádl, E. Náboženství a politika (Religion and Politics). Praha: Jan Laichter, 1921.Search in Google Scholar
Rádl, E. Západ a Východ (West and East). Praha: Jan Laichter, 1925.Search in Google Scholar
Rádl, E. Moderní věda (Modern Science). Praha: Jan Laichter, 1926.Search in Google Scholar
Rádl, E. O smysl našich dějin (Making Sense of Our History). Praha: Jan Laichter, 1925.Search in Google Scholar
Rádl, E. The History of Biological Theories. London: Oxford University Press, 1930/1988.Search in Google Scholar
Rádl, E. Válka Čechů s Němci (The War between the Czechs and the Germans). Praha: Melantrich 1928/1993.Search in Google Scholar
Rádl, E. Národnost jako vědecký problém (Nationality as a Scientific Problem). Praha: O. Girgal, 1929.Search in Google Scholar
Rádl, E. O německé revoluci (On the German Revolution). Praha: Jan Laichter 1933.Search in Google Scholar
Rádl, E. Filosofie dějin I (The Philosophy of History). Praha: Jan Laichter, 1932 (Olomouc 1998).Search in Google Scholar
Rádl, E. Útěcha z filosofie (Consolation from Philosophy). Praha, 1946.Search in Google Scholar
Rawls, J. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press, 1999.Search in Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London: Routledge, 2000.Search in Google Scholar
Taylor, C. Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.Search in Google Scholar
© 2010 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston
This content is open access.
