Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Producing the natural fiber naturally: Technological change and the US organic cotton industry

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Organic cotton productionboomed in the early 1990s only to fall steeplymid-decade. Production is currently rising, butslowly, and has yet to reach previous levels.This is in marked contrast to the steady growthin organic food production during the 1990s.Why, when other areas of organic productionexperienced steady growth, did organic cottonexperience a boom and bust? A study of thecotton production and processing industryreveals a long and heavily industrializedproduction chain that has presented numerouschallenges to growers and processors trying tointroduce an organic product. In addition, muchof the surge in demand for organic cotton clothoriginated with clothing manufacturersresponding to increased consumer environmentalconcern and interest in improving theirenvironmental reputations. This demandevaporated when clothing companies encountereda lack of consumer awareness of theenvironmental costs of conventional cottonproduction and the benefits of organic cotton.Organic clothing lines were abandoned and manycotton farmers, left with no market for theirorganic bales, were forced to either store thebales or sell them on the conventional marketfor a loss. An examination of the social andtechnical aspects of organic cotton productionidentifies some of the critical variables, suchas the risks farmers face in agriculturalproduction, the organic standards, sources ofinnovation in technological change, and the roleof consumer demand in supporting moresustainable technology, all of which shape thecontinuing development of organic products.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, P. (1993). Food for the Future Conditions and Contradictions of Sustainability. New York: Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, P. and M. Kovach (2000). “The capitalist composition of organic: The potential of markets in fulfilling the promise of organic agriculture.” Agriculture and Human Values 17(3): 221–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, P. and C. Sachs (1991). “The social side of sustainability, class gender and race.” Science as Culture 2, Part 4 (No. 13): 569–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batie, S. (1997). “Environmental issues, policy, and the food industry.” In B. Schroder and T. Wallace (eds.), Government and the Food Industry (pp. 235–256). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belasco, W. J. Appetite for Change, How the Counterculture Took on the Food Industry 1966-1988. New York: Pantheon Books.

  • Bijker, W. E. (1997). Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boone, N. (1998). “A brief history of the organic cotton market.” In Business May/June: 31ff.

  • Boone, N. (1999). “Blending organic cotton with conventional cotton.” In D. Myers and S. Stolton (eds.), Organic Cotton: From Field to Final Product (pp. 111–112). London: Intermediate Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chouinard Y. and M. Brown. (1997). “Going organic, converting patagonia's cotton product line.” Journal of Industrial Ecology 1(1): 117–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • DuPuis, E. (2000). “Not in my body: rBGH and the rise of organic milk.” Agriculture and Human Values 17(3): 285–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrel M. (1998). “Manufacturing products that touch the skin.” In Business May/June: 27-31.

  • Fenn, S. (1995). “Green heat.” Technology Review July: 62-63.

  • FitzSimmons, M. (1990). “The social and environmental relations of us agriculture.” In P. Lowe, T. Marsden, and S. Whatmore (eds.), Technological Change and the Rural Environment (pp. 8–32). London: David Fulton Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • FitzSimmons M. and D. Goodman (1998). “Incorporating nature: Environmental narratives and the reproduction of food.” In Remaking Reality: Nature at the Millennium (pp. 194–220). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulmer, T. D. (1992). “Cutting costs and pollution.” America's Textiles International March: 38-41.

  • Gieryn, T. (1999). Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glade E., M. Johnson, and L. Meyer (1996). Cotton Ginning Charges, Harvesting Practices, and Selected Marketing Costs, 1994/1995 Season. Washington, DC: Statistical Bulletin # 929 Economic Research Service, USDA.

  • Goodman, D. and M. Redclift (1991). Refashioning Nature, Food, Ecology and Culture. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, D. B. Sorj, and J. Wilkinson (1987). From Farming to Biotechnology A Theory of Agro-Industrial Development. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman D. and M. Watts (1997). Globalising Food Agrarian Questions and Global Restructuring. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graedel, T., B. Allenby, and P. Linhart (1993). “Implementing industrial ecology.” IEEE Technology and Society Magazine Spring: 18-26.

  • Greene, C. (2001). US Organic Farming Emerges in the 1990s: Adoption of Certified Systems. USDA-ERS. Agriculture Information Bulletin No. 770. Washington, DC: USDA.

  • Haraway, D. (1996). “Modest witness: Feminist diffractions in science studies.” In Peter Galison and David Stump (eds.), The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Contexts and Power (pp. 429–439). Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imhoff, D. (1995). “Growing pains: organic cotton tests the fiber of growers and manufacturers alike.” Farmer to Farmer: 6-10.

  • Jelinski, L., T. Graedel, R. Laudise, D. McCall, and C. Patel (1992). “Industrial ecology: Concepts and approaches.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 89 (February): 793–797.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein H. K. and D. L. Kleinman (2002). “The social construction of technology: Structural considerations.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 27(1): 28–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klonsky, K., L. Tourte, S. Swezey, and D. Chaney (1995). Production Practices and Sample Costs for Organic Cotton, Northern San Joaquin Valley. University of California Cooperative Extension.

  • Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1988). Microbes. The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour B. (1991). We Have Never Been Modern. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, G., J. Norton, and F. Vanclay (2001). “Gene technology, agri-food industries and consumers.” In R. Hindmarsh and G. Lawrence (eds.), Altered Genes II: The Future? (pp. 143–159). Carlton North, Victoria, Australia: Scribe Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockeretz, W. (1997). Visions of American Agriculture. Ames: Iowa State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macnaghten P. and J. Urry (1998). Contested Natures. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquardt, S. (2001). “Organic cotton: Production and marketing trends.” Proceedings Beltwide Cotton Conferences January, Richmond, California. Retrieved from www.organic-research.com/research/papers/cotton.htm in January 2002.

  • Marsden, T. (1998). “Agriculture beyond the treadmill? Issues for policy, theory and research practice.” Progress in Human Geography 22(2): 265–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, T., P. Lowe, and S. Whatmore (1992). “Labour and locality: Emerging research issues.” In T. Marsden, P. Lowe, and S. Whatmore (eds.), Labour and Locality Uneven Development and the Rural Labour Process (pp. 1–19). London: David Fulton Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMichaels, P. (1997). “Rethinking globalization: The agrarian question revisited.” Review of International Political Economy 4(4): 630–662.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, L. and S. MacDonald (2001). Cotton: Background and Issues for Farm Legislation. USDA-ERS Outlook Paper #CWS-0601-01.

  • Moed, A. (1994). “Dress versus excess.” Metropolis Magazine October: 17-24.

  • Mohammadioun, M. M. Gallaway, and J. Apodaca (1994). An Economic Analysis of Organic Cotton as a Niche Crop in Texas. Bureau of Business Research, Graduate School of Business, University of Texas at Austin.

  • Myers, D. and S. Stolton (1999). Organic Cotton: From Field to Final Product. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organic Farming Research Foundation (1997). National Organic Farmers' Survey. Retrieved from http://www.ofrf.org/publications/survey/index.html in January 2002.

  • Organic Trade Association Press Release. Seal of Cotton also Permitted for Organic Cotton, July 5. Retrieved from http://www.organic-research.com/news/2000 in December 2001.

  • Page, B. (1997). “Restructuring pork production, remaking rural iowa.” In D. Goodman and M. Watts (eds.), Globalising Food (pp. 133–157). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, S. L. (1999). “The origin and development of cotton.” In D. Myers and S. Stolton (eds.), Organic Cotton: From Field to Final Product 11. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel D., H. Acquay, M. Biltonen, P. Rice, M. Silva, J. Nelson, V. Lipner, S. Giordano, A. Horowitz, and M. D'amore (1993). “Assessment of environmental and economic impacts of pesticide use.” In D. Pimentel and H. Lehman (eds.), The Pesticide Question: Environment, Economics, and Ethics (pp. 47–84). New York: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raynolds, L. (2000). “Re-embedding global agriculture: The international organic and fair trade movements.” Agriculture and Human Values 17(3): 297–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, S. and R. Farnsworth (1997). “Family factors affecting adoption of sustainable farming systems.” Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 52(4) (Jul/Aug): 265–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, S. (1991). “Power, technology and the phenomenology of conventions: On being allergic to onions.” In J. Law (ed.), A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination (pp. 26–56.) London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sustainable Cotton Project website: http://www.sustainable cotton.org. Accessed December 2001.

  • Sweeney K. (1996). The Strengths and Limits of Consumer-Driven Codes of Conduct, and a Mid-Stream View of the Apparel Industry Partnership. Speech given at the Notre Dame Center for Ethics and Religious Values in Business, October 6.

  • Swezey, S., P. Goldman, R. Vargas, and R. Jergens (1999). “Preliminary studies show yield and quality potential of organic cotton.” California Agriculture 53(4): 9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swezey, S. and P. Goldman (1996). Conversion of Cotton Production to Certified Organic Management in the Northern San Joaquin Valley: Plant Development, Yield, Quality, and Production costs. Proceedings, Beltwide Cotton Conference.

  • Texas Organic Cotton Marketing Cooperative. Website commentary. Retrieved from http://www.texasorganic.com/ in December 2001.

  • Traweek, Sharon (1988). Beamtimes and Lifetimes The World of High Energy Physicists. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA-ERS (1997). World Cotton Report. Washington, DC: Economic Research Service Bulletin, USDA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Elzakker, B. and T. Caldas (1999). “Organic cotton production.” In D. Myers and S. Stolton (eds.), Organic Cotton: From Field to Final Product (pp. 21–35). London: Intermediate Technology Publication.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA

    Mrill Ingram

Authors
  1. Mrill Ingram
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ingram, M. Producing the natural fiber naturally: Technological change and the US organic cotton industry. Agriculture and Human Values 19, 325–336 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021140001193

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021140001193

Search

Navigation