Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Trust in Companies and in CEOs: A Comparative Study of the Main Influences

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Trust is a crucial factor for the long-term economic success of a company. However, not only does the company establish trust, but the CEO representing the company builds up trust as well and, therefore, also influences the company’s success. Our study examines how different dimensions of trust (i.e., ability, integrity, benevolence, and information quality) influence the degree of overall trust in a company and in CEOs. Nevertheless, dimensions that influence trust in a CEO can be completely different to those influencing trust in companies. Companies and CEOs that act on an international level can hardly be experienced individually, and thus people get information about the company via media use. Therefore, additionally we examine which kind of media is used for getting information about a company or CEO and whether a relationship exists between media use and trust. Findings from a survey in Switzerland (n = 245) show that companies are more trusted than CEOs and that the items which influence overall trust differ between CEOs and companies. Social responsibility as a benevolence item is important for both groups. Regarding information on different media channels, users of traditional media like newspapers, TV, and radio are most critical regarding trust in companies and CEOs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barney, J. B. & Hansen, M. H.: 1994, ‘Trustworthiness as a source of competitive advantage’, Strategic Management Journal, 15(4), 175-190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentele, G.: 1994, ‘Öffentliches Vertrauen - normative und soziale Grundlage für Public Relations’, in W. Armbrecht & U. Zabel (Eds.), Normative Aspekte der Public Relations. Eine Einführung, Opladen), pp. 131-158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentele, G. & Seidenglanz, R.: 2005, ‘Vertrauen und Glaubwürdigkeit’, in G. Bentele, R. Fröhlich, & P. Szyszka (Eds.), Handbuch der Public Relations. Wissenschaftliche Grundlagen und berufliches Handeln, (Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden), pp. 346-360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. K.: 1991, ‘Towards understanding and measuring conditions of trust: Evolution of a conditions of trust inventory’, Journal of Management, 17(3), 643-663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. K. & Cantrell, R. S.: 1984, ‘A behavioral decision theory approach to modeling dyadic trust in superiors and subordinates’, Psychological Reports, 55(1), 19-28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, C. & Clapham, S.: 2003, ‘Organizational Trustworthiness. An international perspective’, Journal of Business Ethics, 47(4), 349-364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, C., B. Davis and J. A. Devine: 2008a, ‘Trust, Faith, and Betrayal: Insights from Management for the Wise Believer’, Journal of Business Ethics (Online).

  • Caldwell, C.; Hayes, L. A.; Karri, R. & Bernal, P.: 2008b, ‘Ethical stewardship - implications for leadership and trust’, Journal of Business Ethics, 78(1-2), 153-164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnevale, D. G.: 1995, Trustworthy government: leadership and management strategies for building trust and high performance. (Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Christen, C. T.: 2004, ‘Predicting willingness to negotiate: The effects of perceived power and trustworthiness in a model of strategic public relations’, Journal of Public Relations Research, 16(3), 243-267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, L. L. & Bromiley, P.: 1996, ‘The organizational trust inventory (OTI): development and validation’, in R.M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations, (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), pp. 302-330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currall, S. C. & Inkpen, A. C.: 2002, ‘A multilevel approach to trust in joint ventures’, Journal of International Business Studies, 33(3), 479-495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimmick, J.; Chen, Y. & Li, Z.: 2004, ‘Competition between the internet abd traditional news media: The gratification-opportunities niche dimension’, Journal of Media Economics, 17(1), 19-33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J. H. & Chu, W.: 2003, ‘The role of trustworthiness in reducing transaction costs and improving performance: empirical evidence from united states, japan, and korea’, Organization Science, 14(1), 57-68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grunig, L. A.; Grunig, J. E. & Dozier, D. M.: 2002, Excellent public relations and effective organizations. A study of communication management in three countries. (Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, New Jersey).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, R.: 1991, ‘Trusting Persons, trusting institutions’, in R. Zeckhauser (Ed.), Strategy and Choice, (MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.), pp. 185-209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, R.: 2006, Trust. (Polity Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hon, L. C. & Grunig, J. E.: 1999, Guidelines for measuring relationships in public relations. (Institution for Public Relations, Gainesville, FL).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer, L. T.: 1995, ‘Trust: the connecting link between organizational theory and philosophical ethics’, The Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 379-403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y. H.: 2001, ‘OPRA: A cross-cultural, multiple-item scale for measuring organization-public relationships’, Journal of Public Relations Research, 13(1), 61-90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaye, B. K. & Johnson, T. J.: 2002, ‘Online and the know: uses and gratifications of the web for political information’, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 46(1), 54-71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ki, E.-J. & Hon, L. C.: 2007, ‘Testing the linkages among the organization-public relationship and attitude and behavioral intentions’, Journal of Public Relations Research, 19(1), 1-23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohring, M. & Matthes, J.: 2007, ‘Trust in news media. Development and validation of a multidimensional scale’, Communication Research, 34(2), 231-252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lämsä, A.-M. & Pucetaite, R.: 2006, ‘Development of organizational trust among employees from a contextual perspective’, Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(2), 130-141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N.: 1979, Trust and power. (Wiley, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R.; Davis, J. & Schoormann, D.: 1995, ‘An integrative model of organizational trust’, Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAllister, D.: 1995, ‘Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundation for interpersonal cooperation in organizations’, The Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24-59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Möllering, G.; Bachmann, R. & Lee, S. H.: 2004, ‘Understanding organizational trust - foundations, constellations, and issues of operationalisation’, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19(6), 556-570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Möllering, G. & Sydow, J.: 2005, ‘Kollektiv, kooperativ, reflexiv: Vertrauen und Glaubwürdigkeit in Unternehmungen und Unternehmensnetzwerken’, in B. Dernbach & M. Meyer (Eds.), Vertrauen und Glaubwürdigkeit: Interdisziplinäre Perspektiven, (Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden), pp. 64-93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nawratil, U.: 1999, ‘Glaubwürdigkeit als Faktor im Prozess medialer Kommunikation’, in P. Rössler & W. Wirth (Eds.), Glaubwürdigkeit im Internet. Fragestellungen, Modelle, empirische Befunde, (Fischer, München), pp. 15-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, D.-J. & Berger, B. K.: 2004, ‘The presentation of CEOs in the press, 1990-2000: Increasing salience, positive valence, and a focus on competency and personal dimensions of image’, Journal of Public Relations Research, 16(1), 93-125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rühl, M.: 2005, ‘Vertrauen – kommunikationswissenschaftlich betrachtet’, in B. Dernbach and M. Meyer (eds.), Vertrauen und Glaubwürdigkeit (VS Verlag, Wiesbaden).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sako, M.: 1998, ‘Does trust improve business performance?’, in C. Lane & R. Bachmann (Eds.), Trust within and between organizations: conceptual issues and empirical applications, (University Press, Oxford),

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, S. P.: 1990, ‘Collaring the crime, not the criminal: Reconsidering the concept of white-collar crime’, American Sociological Review, 55(3), 246-365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skolnik, R.: 1994, ‘Portraits of the “most admired companies”‘, Public Relations Journal, 50(5), 14-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban, D. & Mayerl, J.: 2006, Regressionsanalyse: Theorie, Technik und Anwendung. (2 ed.) (VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirth, W.: 1999, ‘Methodologische und konzeptionelle Aspekte der Glaubwürdigkeitsforschung’, in P. Rössler & W. Wirth (Eds.), Glaubwürdigkeit im Internet. Fragestellungen, Modelle, empirische Befunde, (Fischer, München), pp. 47-66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, A.; McEvily, B. & Perrone, V.: 1998, ‘Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance’, Organization Science, 9(2), 141-159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland

    Diana Ingenhoff & Katharina Sommer

Authors
  1. Diana Ingenhoff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Katharina Sommer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diana Ingenhoff.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ingenhoff, D., Sommer, K. Trust in Companies and in CEOs: A Comparative Study of the Main Influences. J Bus Ethics 95, 339–355 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0363-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0363-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation